Confirmed Trade: [VAN/CGY] Elias Lindholm for Andrei Kuzmenko, Hunter Brzustewicz, Joni Jurmo, 2024 1st, cond. 2024 4th

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, Ottawa with Sanderson, Chabot, Zub and Chychrun on D is shit ass team. Senators played solid defense and had more wins than losses at the start.

But scoring 2 points to a team is nothing special for any top6 forward, like at all.
so you saying

The Ottawa Senators is a good team…
 
so you saying

The Ottawa Senators is a good team…

It has more talent than Vancouver, especially on defense. Their goalies suck (pretty much what killed Vancouver last season), and their forwards are very inconsistent. But look at their age, their top forwards are 21-25 year old. Oh, and coaching was a huge problem.
 
It has more talent than Vancouver, especially on defense. Their goalies suck (pretty much what killed Vancouver last season), and their forwards are very inconsistent. But look at their age, their top forwards are 21-25 year old. Oh, and coaching was a huge problem.
They don’t have anyone close to Vancouvers core talent of JTM/Petey/Hughes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HarrySPlinkett
It has more talent than Vancouver, especially on defense. Their goalies suck (pretty much what killed Vancouver last season), and their forwards are very inconsistent. But look at their age, their top forwards are 21-25 year old. Oh, and coaching was a huge problem.

Lol no part of the Ottawa Senators has more talent than Vancouver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Szechwan
Yeah, Ottawa with Sanderson, Chabot, Zub and Chychrun on D is shit ass team. Senators played solid defense and had more wins than losses at the start.

But scoring 2 points to a team is nothing special for any top6 forward, like at all.
Just because you have some good d-men or some young d-men that may eventually become elite doesn't mean your team can't be ass in the mean time. Ottawa is a bottom 10 team with those d-men, what does that tell you?

Also Ottawa was 5-6-0 when they faced the Canucks the night Kuzmenko had 2 points against them. 5-7-0 after losing to them. Where exactly was this winning record you speak of?
 
Just because you have some good d-men or some young d-men that may eventually become elite doesn't mean your team can't be ass in the mean time. Ottawa is a bottom 10 team with those d-men, what does that tell you?

Also Ottawa was 5-6-0 when they faced the Canucks the night Kuzmenko had 2 points against them. 5-7-0 after losing to them. Where exactly was this winning record you speak of?

Ottawa was 8-7-0 after 15 games.

And when your best goalie has 0.890, you hardly can be good...
 
Ottawa was 8-7-0 after 15 games.

And when your best goalie has 0.890, you hardly can be good...
what does the 15 game mark have to do with when the Canucks played them? I'm sure some other bottom 10 teams at some point and time had a winning record this year especially as early as 15 or so games into the season. Does that mean they were good teams too?

Also hate to break it to you, goaltending is 1 aspect of a team, so if you're goalie sucks and you lose a lot due to it, then your team sucks.
 
Moving Kuz was the right thing, glad to see hes doing well, but it was the right move for us.
I doubt Lindholm will win any game for you
But he maybe a good coattail with the right line mates that can carry him if he still has it

Btw, he quit in the playoffs
 
I doubt Lindholm will win any game for you
But he maybe a good coattail with the right line mates that can carry him if he still has it

Btw, he quit in the playoffs

The Canucks don't need him to win games singlehandedly, he's the 7th or 8th most important player on the team. They just need him to win faceoffs and play well defensively. He's playing 3C for the team, not 1C.
 
interesting tidbit, it took beginning of the 4th season (and about 230 career games) for Lindholm
to reach 100 career points, where it took Kuzmenko about 100 less/fewer games, to reach 100 points.

sure sure, Elias was 18 years old when he started his NHL career and Andrei 26
but nevertheless :)

It took trade to Calgary for Lindholm, to breakout in the NHL, at 25. when he scored 70+ points.
 
interesting tidbit, it took beginning of the 4th season (and about 230 career games) for Lindholm
to reach 100 career points, where it took Kuzmenko about 100 less/fewer games, to reach 100 points.

sure sure, Elias was 18 years old when he started his NHL career and Andrei 26
but nevertheless :)

It took trade to Calgary for Lindholm, to breakout in the NHL, at 25. when he scored 70+ points.
Don’t blame Lindy for being a Hurricane. He was playing a ton with Jordan Staal, who’s never missed a team logo on the goalies sweater.

Seriously he played on some of the worst Canes teams ever, especially offensively. They didn’t play him much with young Aho/TT/Skinner, this is why his numbers were poor before he played for Calgary.

It’s hardly appropriate to use as an argument to compare him to Kuzmenko.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
You are downplaying how much was given up.

How do you know Bryz will never get a chance on our blueline? Do you have a crystal box with respect to his development? If he pan out, why would he not be on our blueline?

Your argument isn’t logical


Is an objective analysis this hard? I guess looking at your user name it’s too much to ask for a non-bias take.

No I am not, I laid out exactly what it was and, it wasn't a lot. Again since this is so very hard for you:

A low first is not a big piece. I hope I don't have to explain this, but fear you'll likely not understand this or again create some narrative that doesn't exist....

A nothing prospect is a nothing prospect.

A prospect who likely never ends up getting enough playing time on our blue line, given the abundance of offensive dmen there already, something that was a concern for the Canucks and the player (I explained this clear for you since you seem to be incapable of even basic understanding)

I have already explained the panning out narrative you keep peddling, which I never insinuated. So maybe move on from that?

A cap dump which was advantageous for us to get rid of.


Yah, not a lot.


Again reading comprehension should not be this hard bud. Do better.

Getting cap space past this year was important for the Canucks. Getting out from under Kuzemenko's contract was a good thing. You can argue about the subsequent moves and what was brought back, but the asset that hurts the most in that trade is a 1st.



He was saying under the Canucks blueline, not Calgary's. It'd be very hard for him given how our D is constructed at the moment and other prospects that are in our system.

I didn't like giving him up, but he's exactly the kind of player you want to utilize in a trade like this. You gotta give up assets to get assets. I hope he's able to do well with the Flames.



You seem to be coming at it from the perspective that there needs to be a clear WINNER and a clear LOSER. Not all trades are going to be like that, and the Canucks still benefit from this deal even if Lindholm has turned into a lemon thus far.

Zadorov, specifically, has been really good for the Canucks, and I'd like to try and retain him, although that's probably not going to happen.
1712335409638.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TS Quint
Pretty rough trade in hindsight, especially if we don't make it out of the 1st round. Has the potential to be an awful trade if Brzuskewicz hits.
 
What was Miller's best season at age 22? How good was Hughes defensively at age 21? How many points has Pettersson scored in the last 20 or so games?

And don't forget that Vancouver plays in one of the suckiest divisions ever...
Haha, are you cherry picking on each player to the absolute extreme to make a point that still doesn’t stand up?

The west is so much stronger than the east right now, and Vancouver is playing in a way harder division than the Sens.

Ottawa was 8-7-0 after 15 games.

And when your best goalie has 0.890, you hardly can be good...
Sounds like the goalie plays behind a crap defense. We see marginal goalies do well frequently when behind a good defensive group.
 
Happy to see Kuz playing well. Hopefully Lindholm can find his way, but it’s great to see Kuz get hot and go on a bit of a run. I hope he re-signs and is happy in Calgary.
 
Pretty rough trade in hindsight, especially if we don't make it out of the 1st round. Has the potential to be an awful trade if Brzuskewicz hits.

Canucks GM rushed to make an early trade when they had no need to. The kind of behavior you see from teams in 7th to 10th place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mav3rick07
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad