Proposal: Van - Buffalo

bobbyb2009

Registered User
Sep 3, 2009
1,986
1,065
To Van
Bo Byram
Jason Zucker

To Buffalo
Jonathan Lekkerimaki
Vincent Desharnais
1st

No offence Johnsie, but how would such a deal work with Cap?

7.7 plus 5? 12.7 million from Buffalo and 2 million from Vancouver

10.7 million? Not sure how this would magically happen even if any team or fan would want this?
 

Coffee

Take one step towards the direction you want to go
Nov 12, 2021
9,357
8,284
We already have a ton of prospects and young players on the roster, we need proven NHL players. We should be trading futures+ for players on the roster, not trading our players for futures.
If I’m Buffalo I’m doing this trade.

Desharnais will fill the hole that was created when Ristolainen left
 

Fjordy

It's a disaster
Jun 20, 2018
18,434
10,206
If I’m Buffalo I’m doing this trade.

Desharnais will fill the hole that was created when Ristolainen left
That would be stupid, Desharnais isn't even a top 4 defenseman and the Canucks are willing to trade him when they need a top 4 RD? We already have Clifton in Desharnais' role. Byram has good value because he plays on the first pair, can play LD/RD and has been our best defenseman in Dahlin's absence. Lekkerimaki is doing nothing for us right now. So no. Also Zucker has been very good for us and looked like a top 6 forward even though he's played mostly on the third line.

We shouldn't make this deal and I bet any sane Sabres fan would agree with me.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,449
12,599
Just doesn't really make a lot of sense to me for either team. Buffalo probably aren't looking for more "offensive winger prospects" and more picks to restart the rebuild all over again necessarily. And from a Canucks perspective, it's a ton to give up for a guy who still has plenty of nagging injury/durability concerns.
 

Fjordy

It's a disaster
Jun 20, 2018
18,434
10,206
Was contemplating that and thinking of Hoglander and Benson added but didn’t want to go there yet. I agree it’s a little light but not far off.
No way man, only not Benson, he is our diamond and one of the smartest players on the team. Not to mention his many other good qualities.
 

Johnsie19

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
2,590
373
No offence Johnsie, but how would such a deal work with Cap?

7.7 plus 5? 12.7 million from Buffalo and 2 million from Vancouver

10.7 million? Not sure how this would magically happen even if any team or fan would want this?
Byram makes 7.7 over two yrs. 3.85 cap hit. You could retain %50 on Zucker's expiring deal that'd be just over 6 with two going back. That's like 4.2.

Canucks have that room at the deadline easily. Might have it now even.
 

toddkaz

Registered User
Nov 25, 2022
6,884
4,270
If it were Thompson + Byram for Petey that'd be more palatable but still don't wanna trade Petey.

Cozens and Byram for Miller maybe but even still Cozens contract looks like an anchor currently, despite having upside.


If you aren't winning with what you have yeah
So you do or dont want to trade him for prospects?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad