Proposal: Van - Buffalo
- Thread starter Johnsie19
- Start date
Fjordy
It's a disaster
- Jun 20, 2018
- 18,426
- 10,201
Fjordy
It's a disaster
- Jun 20, 2018
- 18,426
- 10,201
We already have a ton of prospects and young players on the roster, we need proven NHL players. We should be trading futures+ for players on the roster, not trading our players for futures.
No offence Johnsie, but how would such a deal work with Cap?
7.7 plus 5? 12.7 million from Buffalo and 2 million from Vancouver
10.7 million? Not sure how this would magically happen even if any team or fan would want this?
Byram is better than mittelstadt no matter how bad the Sabres are
Coffee
Take one step towards the direction you want to go
- Nov 12, 2021
- 9,355
- 8,283
If I’m Buffalo I’m doing this trade.
Desharnais will fill the hole that was created when Ristolainen left
Fjordy
It's a disaster
- Jun 20, 2018
- 18,426
- 10,201
That would be stupid, Desharnais isn't even a top 4 defenseman and the Canucks are willing to trade him when they need a top 4 RD? We already have Clifton in Desharnais' role. Byram has good value because he plays on the first pair, can play LD/RD and has been our best defenseman in Dahlin's absence. Lekkerimaki is doing nothing for us right now. So no. Also Zucker has been very good for us and looked like a top 6 forward even though he's played mostly on the third line.
We shouldn't make this deal and I bet any sane Sabres fan would agree with me.
Buresflyingelbow
VanCity
- Feb 19, 2018
- 2,706
- 1,890
Byram + Cozens for Elias Pettersson.
Apparently 2 available and one who’s disgruntled. 2 Canadians come back home and Dahlin gets his good friend and countryman.
Cap works out.
Apparently 2 available and one who’s disgruntled. 2 Canadians come back home and Dahlin gets his good friend and countryman.
Cap works out.
biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 27,449
- 12,599
Just doesn't really make a lot of sense to me for either team. Buffalo probably aren't looking for more "offensive winger prospects" and more picks to restart the rebuild all over again necessarily. And from a Canucks perspective, it's a ton to give up for a guy who still has plenty of nagging injury/durability concerns.
Uberpecker
Registered User
- Mar 3, 2011
- 3,629
- 1,759
The hole that was created when Risto left was more than filled by his absence. I think addition by substraction is the term generally used around these parts.
Djp
Registered User
tsujimoto74
Moderator
- May 28, 2012
- 30,757
- 23,682
Lmao no. No one in Buffalo is interested in waiting 8762948 more years for the Sabres to maybe turn good.
tsujimoto74
Moderator
- May 28, 2012
- 30,757
- 23,682
toddkaz
Registered User
- Nov 25, 2022
- 6,884
- 4,269
Buresflyingelbow
VanCity
- Feb 19, 2018
- 2,706
- 1,890
Was contemplating that and thinking of Hoglander and Benson added but didn’t want to go there yet. I agree it’s a little light but not far off.
Fjordy
It's a disaster
- Jun 20, 2018
- 18,426
- 10,201
No way man, only not Benson, he is our diamond and one of the smartest players on the team. Not to mention his many other good qualities.
Billy Kvcmu
Registered User
Byram makes 7.7 over two yrs. 3.85 cap hit. You could retain %50 on Zucker's expiring deal that'd be just over 6 with two going back. That's like 4.2.
Canucks have that room at the deadline easily. Might have it now even.
tsujimoto74
Moderator
- May 28, 2012
- 30,757
- 23,682
If it were Thompson + Byram for Petey that'd be more palatable but still don't wanna trade Petey.
Cozens and Byram for Miller maybe but even still Cozens contract looks like an anchor currently, despite having upside.
If you aren't winning with what you have yeah
toddkaz
Registered User
- Nov 25, 2022
- 6,884
- 4,269
