6'6 is gonna be rough at the 4 spot tbh lol. i think hes strictly a wing. it sucks we lost lowry etc but im excited to see what we can do with these kids. if we can "siakam" like 2 or 3 of these youngsters we gonna bounce back pretty quick.True. I’m excited to see him in summer league, a few seem pretty high on him. I guess I’ll say he seems to profile more as a 3/4 than a 2/3. I think they’re still thin at 2/3 but particularly the 2 where Okpala can hopefully play.
I am more disappointed we couldn't get Okpala in the deal somehow than I am the 2nd.So we aren't getting the rumored 2nd? Lame..
Hope the Dragic flip is worthwhile
So we aren't getting the rumored 2nd? Lame..
Hope the Dragic flip is worthwhile
I am more disappointed we couldn't get Okpala in the deal somehow than I am the 2nd.
Precious will be a great add tho.
Depends on matchups. They played Stanley Johnson at the 4 last year. Jae Crowder, PJ Tucker, Draymond Green etc are all 6’6 and play the 4. Green and Tucker will even play 5 at times.6'6 is gonna be rough at the 4 spot tbh lol. i think hes strictly a wing. it sucks we lost lowry etc but im excited to see what we can do with these kids. if we can "siakam" like 2 or 3 of these youngsters we gonna bounce back pretty quick.
champagnie, precious, johnson, barnes, flynn all have a real chance of being something..people forget precious was 20th pick last year and is a very masai type player, aslo only player d1 freshman to avg a double double in college last year.
(flynn i think is already turning into something very good after watching him this past offseason)
im excited.
i suppose, but we have precious, birch, boucher and gillespie( i think hes still with us lol) at the 4 already. and barnes and OG can play there as well as both are taller with better wingspans. at this point we are definitely shorter on valid wings than forwards.Depends on matchups. They played Stanley Johnson at the 4 last year. Jae Crowder, PJ Tucker, Draymond Green etc are all 6’6 and play the 4. Green and Tucker will even play 5 at times.
Not ideal, but it can work. More likely he’ll play 3 but again, I’d like to see another wing that can play 2 guard. Handle and create some shots for himself. He doesn’t seem to fit that profile - he seems more like a hustle athlete and rebounder in the mold of Hollis-Jefferson.
Plenty of options at 3-4 when we include Barnes and Watanabe to the names you mention. Add Sam Dekker to the mix as well, although I’m not sure what to expect from him.i suppose, but we have precious, birch, boucher and gillespie( i think hes still with us lol) at the 4 already. and barnes and OG can play there as well as both are taller with better wingspans.
i think johnson ends up being a matt thomas type this year with better defense. shot 38% from 3 last year after working on his shot.Plenty of options at 3-4 when we include Barnes and Watanabe to the names you mention. Add Sam Dekker to the mix as well, although I’m not sure what to expect from him.
With Powell gone and Gary Trent presumably starting, I think there’s a need for a 2 guard that can get buckets off the bench. Not sure David Johnson is ready for that so it’ll be interesting to see what they do with Dragic and/or that roster/depth chart spot.
Well I hope he’s a lot better than Matt Thomas. I wasn’t a fan, and he’s likely headed back overseas after being waived by the Jazz.i think johnson ends up being a matt thomas type this year with better defense. shot 38% from 3 last year after working on his shot.
ye their games arent similar, just what i see for type of role, more of a danny green 3 and d type(obviously not danny's numbers) matt thomas was supposed to be that but his shot just never worked, and his de wasnt very good lolWell I hope he’s a lot better than Matt Thomas. I wasn’t a fan, and he’s likely headed back overseas after being waived by the Jazz.
From the few videos I’ve seen, he appears to have wayyy more game. More comparable to Terence Davis than Matt Thomas as someone who profiles more as a combo guard.
If he can shoot in the high 30’s as a 3&D 2 guard with the passing and playmaking he showed in college, that’ll be a very good player.ye their games arent similar, just what i see for type of role, more of a danny green 3 and d type(obviously not danny's numbers) matt thomas was supposed to be that but his shot just never worked, and his de wasnt very good lol
agreed, i really think he fell from being a projected mid to late teens pick solely based off his ppg falling. but literally every other stat he improved in. this is a FVV/norm level pick potentially imo.If he can shoot in the high 30’s as a 3&D 2 guard with the passing and playmaking he showed in college, that’ll be a very good player.
One thing to understand is Masai placed conditions on MLSE prior to considering any contract. It was never about the money it was about Masai feeling that he was going to continue to lead an organization that was willing to commit to winning.
Last summer was a difficult one where he was forced to let players like Ibaka and Gasol walk. Not because of anything else but MLSE not wanting to commit for a team that had already lost its prized possession in Kwahi. That left a sour taste in Masai's mouth.
Him signing points to him receiving reassurances that MLSE basically is giving him free reign on basketball operations and budget. A budget that will be at the same level and commitment as the other powerhouse team under the MLSE umbrella the Toronto Maple Leafs.
This bodes well for all Raptor fans. There is a meaning to his madness this off season. In Masai we should trust. He did bring the first ever NBA championship north of the border. And if he says he will do it again, he will. This man knows how to build a winner.
I look for this coming season to be a season where we let the team develop under a new leader on court. That leader will be FVV. Players will get better and stronger, we will have more cap space next off season. We may be a lottery team, but its fine. Again in Masai we should trust.
Good times people. Good times ahead. Welcome home Masai.
Not top 3, but dame lillard is top 10 at worst and Bradley beals a top 15-20 guy and both are available right now.
Most of these ‘issues’ don’t really hold up to scrutiny when you step back and evaluate. I guess customs is a pain when you’re used to domestic travel, taxes are always a pain, and not being able to invite the homies kind of sucks, but everything else is pretty trivial IMo.
It’s unfortunate because it seemed the stigma was lifting, maybe it actually has and this just wasn’t the year… but again, I think the added travel restrictions + Masai’s uncertainty definitely hindered their chances this year.
I tend to agree, I don’t Lillard, and especially Beal move the needle enough for Toronto to make a compelling offer. just more so making a point that there’s always another guy who’s going to come available.Is this team better than Milwaukee, Miami, Clippers, Lakers, Nets, retooled GSW with Lillard?
I dont think so, he definitely pushes them closer. But, he won't come cheap and assuming Siakim would have to other way to make salaries work.
Im not against bringing in Lillard, but i dont think he makes toronto a contender
That’s interesting. I’ve heard a lot of intrigue with this player, particularly with the Spencer Dinwiddie comparisons.agreed, i really think he fell from being a projected mid to late teens pick solely based off his ppg falling. but literally every other stat he improved in. this is a FVV/norm level pick potentially imo.