No. That’s one of Utah’s most important young pieces for a 32-year-old rental.Granlund for Doan
I was trying to be kind and not condescending, but you're right, I should at the very least also be accurate. Three? Nah... soon to be four.you mean the last three, right?
No, they're not.EP yes, but not for that package. I imagine both But and Simashev are untouchable.
Honestly, I think they should trade for Demko as it establishes they have a true number one goalie.
Utah:
Thatcher Demko
Vancouver:
Connor Ingram
Daniil But
2nd round pick
No. That’s one of Utah’s most important young pieces for a 32-year-old rental.
Not a player I want given the decline in performance and the long big money contract.Honestly as a buy low option it's not the worst idea. Utah does need a 2C.
Oof. No thanks.Granlund for Doan
Awful for UHC. Demko is better than Ingram but not by that amount.Honestly, I think they should trade for Demko as it establishes they have a true number one goalie.
Utah:
Thatcher Demko
Vancouver:
Connor Ingram
Daniil But
2nd round pick
UHC passes.Pettersson for Gunther and a 1st.
VAN completes the OEL circle of life (while paying him to play in Toronto.
I'd take Guenther, currently. His upside is pretty large and you're going to give up too much to get Pettersson and not get enough back.UHC passes.
Pettersson has a lot to prove with that monster contract. Guenther is not available.
No, they're not.
You're getting a #1c capable of a 90-100 point seasons. Everything bar Cooley and Keller is on the table.
And for 4 million less a year for 8 more years after this one. His contract will look like MacKinnon's was, when it's over. The value you get out of Guenther outweighs the extra 10-20 points a season you might get out of Pettersson.Yeah I don't think Petterson is ever going to put up 100 again.
They can make another move after to get one. Seems like there has been a lot of talk around them moving a Dman (position of strength? Especially if they acquire Andersson), soooo... how good of a C do you think you'd get for Byram or Power? Byfield? Pinto? Wright? Not that I'm suggesting 1-for-1 on any of these...Considering Buffalo also needs a 2C if they’re trading their 2C, you see where this goes right…
why would they trade But? stupid offerHonestly, I think they should trade for Demko as it establishes they have a true number one goalie.
Utah:
Thatcher Demko
Vancouver:
Connor Ingram
Daniil But
2nd round pick
not happening...McAvoy and a 1st for for cooley.
Keller + McBain + 2nd + 4th
For
Marner(50%) + Vet + random prospect
Haven’t figured out who the vet or team retaining is yet. lol.
McBain likely being the tipping point? Or Keller/Marner(UFA) too close in value?I wouldn’t touch this if I were Utah.
McBain likely being the tipping point? Or Keller/Marner(UFA) too close in value?