- Jan 9, 2009
- 16,635
- 11,081
Hockey Club is a stupid nickname, Mammoths will end up being shortened all the time to Mams... which is also stupid.
Therefore Outlaws wins by default.
Therefore Outlaws wins by default.
I think things like Skinwalker (and Wendigo for northern teams) are basically a bit taboo to use as team names because they are important to the traditions of tribes in those areas. I still think they'd be cool names but sadly probably not viable for a team name. With that said, there are plenty of stories about Skinwalker Ranch with aliens that you could end up with something like the Utah Visitors.View attachment 970916
If they're still want to go cryptids, but Wasatch is out, why not The Skinwalkers. I could see the uniforms now.
Or howbout The Flats?
They could have sued Teddy Roosevelt.The Rough Riders were founded in 1876, The (Sask) Roughriders in 1910, so there's a chance copyright/trademark laws weren't what they are now when the Saskatchewan team was founded.
And managed to fit in the abortive Rocky Mountain Xtreme concept too.Agreed, the Avalanche had less time than Utah did and were able to change their name.
How does Outlaws or Mammoth feel "forced"If we don’t mind there being the Sacramento Kings and the Los Angeles Kings, there’s zero reason we shouldn’t have the Utah Raptors. It’s the only one that has made sense since the start and doesn’t feel forced.
Better? Yeti was terrible, I'm glad it's out...they're really running on empty for names though.I kind of like Hockey Club. It's funny and they already eliminated the better options like Yeti.
They can go full Euro football and use HC, then they can have the Yeti corp pay them a sponsorship fee and have “Yeti” on their jerseysI kind of like Hockey Club. It's funny and they already eliminated the better options like Yeti.
How does Outlaws or Mammoth feel "forced"
Could have badass pregame intro song as they take the ice.I’ll say it again -
Salt lake sentinals
/thread
You think they will want to take those titles away from the bigger market areas like the Vancouver Canucks, New York Rangers & Philadelphia Flyers who creating all that fuzz on their own?I feel like the league should step in and punish the Utah ownership for all this name drama by forcing them to temporarily adopt the name 'Utah Drama Queens' for the '25-'26 NHL season.
I don't even understand how Hockey Club is on the table.
Stumbling unknowingly into sentences like "alright, we've got a road trip coming up where we play the Avs, the Wild, the... Hockey Club, and the Predators" has been the absolute worst part of this current season in my opinion.
Still don't think it was acceptable to just twiddle their thumbs all year last year and not pick a damn name.
You mean the way that Rangers is shortend to Rains, Flyers to Flies, and Panthers to Pans?Hockey Club is a stupid nickname, Mammoths will end up being shortened all the time to Mams... which is also stupid.
Therefore Outlaws wins by default.
How does Outlaws or Mammoth feel "forced"
The Outlaws is the best name. Doesn’t really work with the current color scheme though. That Mammoth POC logo looks pretty good, but not a fan of names like Mammoth, Wild or Avalanche.
![]()
Utah Outlaws would be perfect. Outlaws is the exact opposite thing I think of when it comes to Utah. But they also have the Utah Jazz. Utah is also the absolute last place I think of when it comes to Jazz music. So its fun to be ironic I guess.
Your very premise is faulty.I don't think anyone calls them by their fantasy names unless it's a team from a city with two teams.
Chances are they just say, "next week we are in Colorado and after that we are playing Utah".
I never really understood that reasoning. A fierce or speedy team name won't make the team fierce nor fast. Why not go for a name that carries historic or local significance, or simply something people like, instead of trying to characterize the individual players with something they're not anyway?I can't believe some people actually like the Mammoth.
We're big, hairy, slow and extinct, let's go team!