Utah Hockey Club down to final 3 names: Hockey Club, Mammoth, and Outlaws (upd: Wasatch already nixed)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Utah Outlaws would be perfect. Outlaws is the exact opposite thing I think of when it comes to Utah. But they also have the Utah Jazz. Utah is also the absolute last place I think of when it comes to Jazz music. So its fun to be ironic I guess.
Or the Lakers
Reminds me of the BASEketball movie...

Soon it was commonplace for entire teams to change cities in search of greater profits. The Minneapolis Lakers moved to Los Angeles where there are no lakes. The Oilers moved to Tennessee where there is no oil. The Jazz moved to Salt Lake City where they don't allow music. The Raiders moved from Oakland to LA back to Oakland, no-one seemed to notice.
 
Outlaws and mormons don't mix

Hmm, do you feel non-Mormons somehow 'mix' with the notion of 'Outlaws'?

I'm sure Mormons are smart enough to realize that the hockey players playing for their local team are not in fact 'Outlaws' and will not be promoting lawless behavior.

The name is absolutely fine as long as you don't read too much into it (which you are doing)
 
Last edited:
still like utah Snipes. animal logo of some kind, doesnt offend anyone, local to utah and related to hockey.

320.jpg
 
  • Wow
Reactions: 1989
Someone on X floated the Utah Raptors, which to me just makes sense and sounds good too. Unfortunately, it's taken. I personally don't like the Mammoth. I didn't like the Kraken when I first heard it and its started to grow on me.

What about the Utah Scorpions.
 
Someone on X floated the Utah Raptors, which to me just makes sense and sounds good too. Unfortunately, it's taken. I personally don't like the Mammoth. I didn't like the Kraken when I first heard it and its started to grow on me.

What about the Utah Scorpions.

I don't like Raptors from a branding POV because of how unique it is. I get sports teams share names regularly, but in this day and age I don't think it's a smart thing to do with a very unique name associated with only one team. Imagine an NBA expansion team calling themselves the Avalanche.

Mammoth seems to be the best name. Outlaws feels like the name that would be used for a fictional Houston football team in a cheesy sports film. The only reason I would use Hockey Club would be if it was a way to use the Yeti branding, but I also think that is a bad move marketing wise because they would be encouraging the fans to view them as something they can't actually market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoardsofCanada
I feel like the league should step in and punish the Utah ownership for all this name drama by forcing them to temporarily adopt the name 'Utah Drama Queens' for the '25-'26 NHL season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Hat and BB79
anything but HC. This isn't soccer.
I'd pick Mammoth between the 2

I mean that's why it's called HOCKEY club, not FC or SC.
It's really not that uncommon to name a hockey club..... hockey club.
But I suppose if you need it to be named after some weird mythical creature or a landmark that your prerogative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nogatco Rd
I don't even understand how Hockey Club is on the table.

Stumbling unknowingly into sentences like "alright, we've got a road trip coming up where we play the Avs, the Wild, the... Hockey Club, and the Predators" has been the absolute worst part of this current season in my opinion.

Still don't think it was acceptable to just twiddle their thumbs all year last year and not pick a damn name.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad