Player Discussion: Unpopular Opinion: Romanov Has Not Helped NYI Take The Next Step

impaaaaaact

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
2,232
1,940
Brooklyn, NY
That's my bad, Taswell said it and I attributed it to you.

But at this point in my life I see Romanov as a for sure top 4 dman and I'm happy with the trade whether the the pick used becomes a hall of famer or bust. Because it doesn't matter what that pick does, we don't know who we would have selected or how their development would be. Question is, are you ok with trading a 13th overall pick for a 22 year old top 4 dman? My answer is yes. We're gonna get years out of Romanov.
I'm happy with the trade too, it made sense at the time. Gave up the possibility of a higher upside for a cost controlled sure thing when you needed it... and we got George too who seems to be a good find.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kevin27NYI

Kevin27NYI

Registered User
Aug 5, 2009
20,109
6,122
I'm happy with the trade too, it made sense at the time. Gave up the possibility of a higher upside for a cost controlled sure thing when you needed it... and we got George too who seems to be a good find.
Justin Bourne kicked the idea around of wondering the benefit of a GM that exclusively trades 1st rounders for young talent when it becomes available. The 20-25 guys. I wondered how that would play out, you do need the ELC space and I think that's where the issue is but it's a fun idea to kick. Just watched Jiricek go for what would be a 20+ first rounder
 
  • Like
Reactions: impaaaaaact

impaaaaaact

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
2,232
1,940
Brooklyn, NY
Justin Bourne kicked the idea around of wondering the benefit of a GM that exclusively trades 1st rounders for young talent when it becomes available. The 20-25 guys. I wondered how that would play out, you do need the ELC space and I think that's where the issue is but it's a fun idea to kick. Just watched Jiricek go for what would be a 20+ first rounder
The Jiricek thing is interesting because he could conceivably go supernova... but for a first, second, third, fourth, and young guy who has already made a couple of NHL appearances you have a lot of outs there. The second is in 2027 so it might be a long time until we know who won that trade
 

crashthenet

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
6,139
1,362
Hockey Falls
He seems to have a chunk of games where he looks like he has taken a corner, then it seems he regresses to some of the types of plays he made when he first got here. His regular partner (Dobson) has not been good, so I know he has changed partners here and there so I will cut him some slack.
Dobson can't be overlooked.

Have my doubts about the system as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarsTBOW

seafoam

Soft Shock
Sponsor
May 17, 2011
61,206
10,700
I am just a little disappointed. If you are moving a top 15 in this day and age you should get a D with some more offense in my opinion.
 

Kevin27NYI

Registered User
Aug 5, 2009
20,109
6,122
I am just a little disappointed. If you are moving a top 15 in this day and age you should get a D with some more offense in my opinion.
That's fair, especially with the makeup of our team, I just didn't care for the pick/draft class
 

Glorydays22

Registered User
Nov 21, 2011
1,696
935
Title says it all. I love Romy, but unfortunately he has not moved the needle.
Bottom line is...We have other defensemen that need to be moved first and fast! i.e - Pelech and Mayfield.

But he definitely doesn't move the needle nor should we have expected that. I watched him while playing in Montreal and I thought he was average at best. But we can live with him, if we improve the other 2 weak links on the back end (Pelech & Mayfield)

Our defense to be honest is a complete mess. To me, only Pullock is a lock to say for now. I'm open to moving everyone else - in Dobson, it would need to be a haul, but he's definitely not untouchable anymore. Not the way he's regressed
 
Last edited:

Rehabguy

In ROY I trust
Oct 2, 2011
5,210
2,040
I wasn't so enamored with him initially with all the comparisons to Kasper. He played horribly under Lambert and I thought he must have lacked brain cells but then I realized he was just following orders from Lambert and he's obviously brain dead so... Under Roy he has been improving with each game, upping his physicality at the right opportunity, and just playing much smarter. He's a keeper and the fact that we got George as well with the trade this has to be Lou Lamiorellos best transactions as the Isles GM.
 

BelovedIsles

Registered User
Oct 22, 2005
20,822
5,992
Romanov has taken a step forward in his development the past two years. His physicality has really struck me, his decision making has improved; I generally feel comfortable when he’s out there defending. He’s a solid D man, it was a solid trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lek

Kevin27NYI

Registered User
Aug 5, 2009
20,109
6,122
I am just a little disappointed. If you are moving a top 15 in this day and age you should get a D with some more offense in my opinion.
Just to expand further on this, especially when judging Lous moves as whole.

Saw someone say in another thread that the Horvat, Palmieri, Romanov, Pageau trades were on paper wins.

What handcuffs Lou in my eyes is not getting say a Jake Guentzel. Individually all wins IMO. Would do every single one again.

Just wish we could mix in a sure fire 75+ point player. Yes I know, easier said than done.
 

Throttle

Registered User
Sep 22, 2020
6,108
4,525
Lou acquired Romanov the season after the isles had a gaping hole in their defense, signed an 800 year old Chara, and missed the playoffs for the first time in Lou’s tenure.

So, Lou was looking to acquire a cost controlled defenseman and plug a top 4 hole. He also guaranteed a return on that pick when the Isles were still in their window under cap constraints.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kevin27NYI

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad