Oscar Lindberg
Registered User
Maybe they were concerned about him going UFA and saw an opportunity to get him signed so they view burning a year as the cost of doing business
Maybe they were concerned about him going UFA and saw an opportunity to get him signed so they view burning a year as the cost of doing business
True, neither of them are really PP material. You see the plays die on their sticks, otherwise I’m confident our second PP could be better than the first. Also Adam Fox is a god.Frankly, Miller has been awful on the man advantage. He's not ready for that kind of role at all.
it’s pointless. beyond the fact he isn’t ready, if he wanted to start next season I could at least understand. he could get valuable AHL time and be a midseason call up or something. this is just a poor move capwise.It really isn't that big a deal.
it’s pointless. beyond the fact he isn’t ready, if he wanted to start next season I could at least understand. he could get valuable AHL time and be a midseason call up or something. this is just a poor move capwise.
lets slow the roll on poor capwise move....if it becomes an issue going forward thats a good thing for us, meaning he is more then readyit’s pointless. beyond the fact he isn’t ready, if he wanted to start next season I could at least understand. he could get valuable AHL time and be a midseason call up or something. this is just a poor move capwise.
it’s pointless. beyond the fact he isn’t ready, if he wanted to start next season I could at least understand. he could get valuable AHL time and be a midseason call up or something. this is just a poor move capwise.
it would still be an increase over his ELC, and we need all the cap space we can get.He can still do that.
If hes as "not ready" as you claim, his next contract won't be anything crazy anyway.
it would still be an increase over his ELC, and we need all the cap space we can get.
Even if this is all accurate, aren't you at least excited to see what this kid can do this year?
We traded 2 2nd rounders to get Fox NHL development minutes sooner, and that ended up being a good tradeoff. Maybe if they throw Jones right in the deep end of the pool he learns to swim faster. This was probably meant to prevent him staying in the NCAA another season
they play opposite sides here, don't agree with this at allChris Peters saying this signing could impact Lundkvist's decision to sign
If we're in a position where a million here or there is THAT big of an issue, the problem isn't that they signed Jones.
Chris Peters saying this signing could impact Lundkvist's decision to sign
Jones’ age might also play a factor here. Apparently signing him next year would allow for a 2 year deal, not 3
If that’s the case burning the year now is irrelevant. He gets paid quicker and the Rangers get him under contract
I know what the kid can do. I know he’s not NHL ready. He’ll make some really nice plays offensively and be a total liability defensively. He’s not strong enough either. If he even gets to play a shift with the big club, it’ll be painfully obvious he’s not ready. I don’t mind his deciding to go pro now rather than spend another year in college. I do mind that we’re signing a contract now rather than give him a chance next year, get him in camp, get him tested with NHL players etc.
Lundkvist has an open spot at 3RD next year, why on earth would he not sign?Chris Peters saying this signing could impact Lundkvist's decision to sign
He says in response to someone suggesting Lundkvist will replace Tony DeAngelo by saying will Nils want to be a 3rd pair D?they play opposite sides here, don't agree with this at all
nils is also the better prospect
That’s what I get for trusting twitterThis is incorrect. If he were to sign next summer, it would still be a 3-year ELC
View attachment 421278
well then Chris Peters is an idiot....because jones still wouldn't be replacing Deangelo on the 3rd pair....hed be replacing hajek or smithH
He says in response to someone suggesting Lundkvist will replace Tony DeAngelo by saying will Nils want to be a 3rd pair D?