I hope that UPL's growth this season shows the Buffalo FO how it takes goalies time to develop properly.Last season I saw a big athletic goalie that had talent but played spastic behind terrible defense. Fundamentals went out the window as he scrambled laterally in vain against HDCs. Despite that he had stretches of showing #1 ability, and looked like he could turn a corner if he had some stable defense. I mean, not good defense, but at least not 5 odd-mans or breakaways every start.
To me he showed great potential, but it was clear at the beginning of this season that KA and/or the coaching staff thought a lot less of him, or maybe decided that Levi was all that as a rookie. Either way it's one of the issues that makes me seriously question their collective judgement. UPL didn't get a start until almost two weeks into the season. Levi continued to get starts after showing he wasn't ready, when Comrie got hurt and UPL was already showing to be the better guy.
The bias or poor judgement was clear from the start. I just hope they don't stay hard-headed about the situation and force Levi as the starter or 1A guy whenever he's done in Rochester (unless he REALLY proves it).
An improving goalie on a struggling team and an inceasing salary cap would sign a contract that would make him the 34th highest paid goalie because?? Would $4 million a season be unreasonable?If he will take 3 x 3, lock him in.
Last season I saw a big athletic goalie that had talent but played spastic behind terrible defense. Fundamentals went out the window as he scrambled laterally in vain against HDCs. Despite that he had stretches of showing #1 ability, and looked like he could turn a corner if he had some stable defense. I mean, not good defense, but at least not 5 odd-mans or breakaways every start.
To me he showed great potential, but it was clear at the beginning of this season that KA and/or the coaching staff thought a lot less of him, or maybe decided that Levi was all that as a rookie. Either way it's one of the issues that makes me seriously question their collective judgement. UPL didn't get a start until almost two weeks into the season. Levi continued to get starts after showing he wasn't ready, when Comrie got hurt and UPL was already showing to be the better guy.
The bias or poor judgement was clear from the start. I just hope they don't stay hard-headed about the situation and force Levi as the starter or 1A guy whenever he's done in Rochester (unless he REALLY proves it).
Granato no doubt will heavily punish him and damage his confidence- perhaps combined with some praise for Levi in the press- as is tradition.Stinker today folks
Stinker today folks
UPL thruthers unite!Whodathunkit that recovery from double hip surgery and regular playing time might have resulted in a legitimate NHL goalie
It's confidence, he knows the net is his. As @Chainshot said he's looking like his old Sudbury selfWhat I like about Luukkonen (and this run he's been on) -- is it doesn't seem like a fluke.
He's looks a steady, blue-collar sort, who appears to be well prepared each night to put in good shift of 60 (or more) minutes.
His improvement has been of the steady variety, too.
It also shows that tenders need reps. They need to see alot of pucks to stay sharp. It appears we are seeing that pay dividends in Rochester as well. One has to wonder why it took so long.It's confidence, he knows the net is his. As @Chainshot said he's looking like his old Sudbury self
It took until Ullmark's D+7 season for him to be a solid NHL goalie.It also shows that tenders need reps. They need to see alot of pucks to stay sharp. It appears we are seeing that pay dividends in Rochester as well. One has to wonder why it took so long.
I wasn't referring to UPLs timeframe. Rather the fact any goalie needs to see as many pucks as possible, especially a starter. I thought splitting time early was detrimental to both goalies.It took until Ullmark's D+7 season for him to be a solid NHL goalie.
This is UPL's D+7 season.
Maybe it didn't take long and it just took what it takes...
Gotcha.I wasn't referring to UPLs timeframe. Rather the fact any goalie needs to see as many pucks as possible, especially a starter. I thought splitting time early was detrimental to both goalies.