hersky77
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2007
- 8,370
- 652
Isn't the goal to win? This would be an incredibly underwhelming appointment.
Everything united has done since Ferguson retired has been underwhelming.
there arent many options out there
Isn't the goal to win? This would be an incredibly underwhelming appointment.
Point was that saying no to a club smaller in stature than the one you're currently with ≠ saying no to a club that's larger in stature than the one you're currently withPoint was he's not moving anywhere. Plus Rodgers has a stench of failure and Liverpool in him.
Yea, he has no reason to go from Leicester to Newcastle, but the history of Manchester United might pull him in.Point was that saying no to a club smaller in stature than the one you're currently with ≠ saying no to a club that's larger in stature than the one you're currently with
Pulisic has been perennially injured since he carried us to top four at the end of 19-20Pulisic is still injured. Should just play Havertz as a false 9 I guess.
It's still United, there will be better options than Southgate.... Any decent club-level Manager would be a better hire than the guy who failed at Middlesbrough.Everything united has done since Ferguson retired has been underwhelming.
there arent many options out there
Point was that saying no to a club smaller in stature than the one you're currently with ≠ saying no to a club that's larger in stature than the one you're currently with
Okay but you said that he said no to newcastle, implying that he would therefore say no to united. They're different clubs with different appeals.I wasn't making that point.
Okay but you said that he said no to newcastle, implying that he would therefore say no to united. They're different clubs with different appeals.
Your argument sucked and now you're claiming you didn't make it.
It’ll be complete when we tie it up in the 83rd only to lose the game 6-2The Ole masterclass has begun.
Your words: "Neymar may be the best penalty taker ever." and then a post later: "He might be the best ever on penalties, at least from a subjective assessment."
Of course in the very same post, a few words later you say: "There's probably some guy in Malaysia with a 100% record that'll claim the best % rate, but Neymar is probably the best of the guys considered world class of the last few generations at least. "
Which is the back track of the century, given in that very same post you repeated your claim he might be the best ever at penalties. So then it's suddenly the best out of a group of maybe 10-15 players which runs directly counter to your previous claim *in the same post*. There's no reason to believe the best penalty takers in the world would be recruited from 'players considered world class' overall.
So in other words, before calling out the reading comprehension skills of others, maybe consider that the problem is the incoherence of your argument.