Tyson Barrie

Thepoolmaster

Registered User
Dec 3, 2011
1,999
759
Yes. I'm old school. I like big old bruising dmen. The impact they make cannot be measured and they change the game. That said every team needs a PP QB or 2. I just have concerns with us having 3. If that small, skilled guy can play stout D then I'm all for it. Problem is our guys can't.

I like Barrie but I'd rather have Nemeth at 2.5 mil per as well as a forward like Gustav Nyquist for 5 mil per than having to pay Barrie 7 mil per.

Look at it this way:

Tyson Barrie 7 mil per

Or

Gustav Nyquist 5 mil per
Patrick Nemeth 2.5 mil per

So for around the same money we get a 60 point top 6 forward and a reliable veteran Dman for our bottom pairing and an excellent penalty killer.

Then we turn around and flip Barrie.

Nazim Kadri 4.5 mil per
Kasperi Kapanen 2.5 mil per

So you either keep Barrie or add potentially 4 solid players and fix our 2nd line at the same time.

Nyquist 22 goals, 38 assists, 60 points
Kadri 16 goals, 28 assists, 44 points
Kapanen 20 goals, 24 assists, 44 points
Nemeth 17 TOI. 131 blocks. +5

Or

Barrie 14 goals, 45 assists, 59 points

It's an easy decision for me. And we still have piles of money to make a splash signing like Panarin if we want.

As for Makar, the dudes going to be a monster. He showed up in the playoffs and passed the test. We have nothing to worry about with him. And EJ isn't going anywhere. He is still a solid top 4 dman and a team leader.

Didn't want to get into this thread but this literally makes no sense. You say for the same money we get Nyquist + Nemeth which is better than Barrie (wrong but irrelevant). When we could just add Nyquist and Nemeth since Kadri and Kapanen would cost the same salary cap wise as Barrie.

It's not 4 players for Barrie... Its 2 Kadri and Kapanen...

Barrie + Nyquist + Nemeth
Vs
Kadri + Kapanen + Nyquist + Nemeth

Unless I misunderstood your overall point and you're really arguing you'd rather have Nemeth playing every night instead of Barrie.
 

The Mars Volchenkov

Registered User
Mar 31, 2002
49,660
3,713
Colorado
I've stood next to Makar. I think he's bigger than that 5'11" or whatever you've listed. He's not this small, undersized defenseman, he just needs to put on some muscle like most 20 year olds do. And Girard is very good defensively. People need to stop lumping all three of them together because they're all pretty different.

I've moved onto team re-sign Barrie. However, Sakic's whole thing about feeling comfortable going into the season with Barrie but without an extension seems like a disaster waiting to happen.

The Bruins aren't exactly throwing out a blue line of giants with Krug, Cliffton, McAvoy, and Grzeleck. They seem to be just fine.
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,161
37,363
If Barrie isn’t signed this summer it clearly means there’s a handshake/verbal agreement to extend him one day after the expansion draft next June.


Clearly
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,161
37,363
Except there won't be an expansion draft next June.
I was about to crush you with a response until a quick google search showed me that I have been completely out of touch with the dates for this expansion draft. I legitimately thought Seattle started in 2020/21.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iceberg

MarkT

Heretic
Nov 11, 2017
4,019
4,574
Honestly this thread should be renamed "OwenNolan argue with everyone about Barrie" because that's what it is, rather than the reasonable, mature discussion about Barrie that I think this board needs. But I don't think it should be closed - I think it should be salvaged. Because honestly the people insulting OwenNolan and complaining that the thread should be closed - those people are exactly what makes Barrie discussions so unbearable.

Anyway, in an attempt to steer this conversation into rational territory again, I read the whole thing. Here to the best of my ability, are the arguments for and against trading Barrie (and my thoughts on them)

Trade Barrie
· He’ll be 35 in 7 years

Very good point. He's likely to decline before the end of his next deal, and this should be a factor is deciding whether to sign or trade him.
· Who plays the PK if we have Barrie, Girard and Makar on the roster?
Girard or Makar, but the other three defensemen would probably get the vast majority of PK time. I don't think this is a valid argument for trading Barrie.
· His cap space could be spent on scoring
Agreed.
· We fill a need at forward by trading him
Agreed.
· The defense is too small with him on it
This point has been thoroughly refuted in the rest of the thread. He and Girard are the only legitimately small defensemen on the roster, and Girard has shown signs of being able to compensate for his size and still be physical.
· He’ll likely make #1 D money without being a #1 D
Probably the best argument for trading him, if true.
· He’s not good defensively
Another excellent reason to trade him.
· He’s inconsistent
Not a huge issue IMO, but a valid point.
· His role may be taken soon by Makar and/or Girard
Another good point. You could slot Makar into his role right now and probably only have a small drop in production, if any. You could do the same with Girard and have a larger drop, but better defensive ability to balance it out.
· If we trade EJ, who takes over his role?
People suggest trading EJ instead, but Ian Cole, Zadorov and Nemeth are less ideal replacements for EJ in my mind than Girard and Makar are for Barrie.
· He is likely overvalued by at least one NHL GM
Another good argument
· He’s only a powerplay specialist
He's also excellent offensively at 5 on 5 when he's on his game. Not a good point.
· We have enough good defensemen to make a good top 4 without him
Another good point. Some combo of Makar, Girard, EJ, Cole and Zadorov makes a very solid top 4 with enough puck movers and defensive ability.

Keep Barrie
· All that offense from the backend would be dominant

Barrie, Makar and Girard can't all play at once. I'd rather give Makar and Girard 20+ minutes of prime offensive minutes than have to split that time with Barrie.
· Subtracting Barrie makes us worse
This is the dumbest argument for keeping him, as if we traded him it would presumably be for equal value at least.
· We can trade him later
He's only getting older, and his value might drop if Makar/Girard steals some of his offensive minutes.
· He’s elite offensively
The best reason to keep him. He has skills from the backend very few players in the league can match. We'd definitely miss his offensive skills if we trade him.
· Makar/Girard aren’t currently ready to take over his role
They wouldn't need to completely replace him if we were also getting scoring from whoever we got in the Barrie trade.
· Makar isn’t small
This is true, and he's likely going to get bigger.
· EJ should be moved instead
He has presumably less value as he is older and doesn't put up the sexy offensive numbers Barrie does. It's also less obvious how we can replace his role as shutdown defenseman/PK specialist/minute eater. He should also still be valuable as his role diminishes as he can become a bottom pair PK guy quite easily. Barrie with a diminished role becomes almost useless.
· Trading Barrie for a forward makes no difference in terms of scoring
This is just wrong. If we trade Barrie for a forward the team overall will likely score just as many goals, but will probably let in fewer as forwards are usually less responsibly for defending, and the guy we get for Barrie might actually be better defensively than him.
 
Last edited:

Goulet17

Registered User
May 22, 2003
7,945
3,788
What are the rules as far as signing your own players to new contracts? The Avs can extend Barrie after July 1st, correct? It would seem to me that if it is not done quickly after July 1st and he is heading into the season in the last season of his current deal, we likely would know the direction things are heading. It would not surprise me if the Avs treat him as their own rental for the 2019-2020 season, like the Stastny situation.
 

Avsboy

Registered User
Dec 12, 2006
32,244
16,658
Barrie obviously should be kept. It's not just points, but points from the backend. The only question is how much is too much. I don't go a penny over 8 million.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Northern Avs Fan

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,161
37,363
Nobody:

Tyson Barrie:
9332D5F6-3AC8-41D5-B022-8C937A77B2E3.jpeg


AACCAC08-13F6-4708-96D8-18FF37BA38FC.jpeg
 

Ivan13

Not posting anymore
May 3, 2011
26,141
7,095
Zagreb, Croatia
Ugh that was going to be my line. Amazing that people still somehow fail to grasp this concept

This thread is a perfect example that the following concepts are lost on some:

  • every player develops at a different rate
  • inflation and how it influences contracts
  • having the puck on your stick is best D
  • we are not in 1998 anymore
 
  • Like
Reactions: Y3TI

Patagonia

Keep Whining
Jan 6, 2017
7,625
3,247
Honestly this thread should be renamed "OwenNolan argue with everyone about Barrie" because that's what it is, rather than the reasonable, mature discussion about Barrie that I think this board needs. But I don't think it should be closed - I think it should be salvaged. Because honestly the people insulting OwenNolan and complaining that the thread should be closed - those people are exactly what makes Barrie discussions so unbearable.

Anyway, in an attempt to steer this conversation into rational territory again, I read the whole thing. Here to the best of my ability, are the arguments for and against trading Barrie (and my thoughts on them)

Trade Barrie
· He’ll be 35 in 7 years

Very good point. He's likely to decline before the end of his next deal, and this should be a factor is deciding whether to sign or trade him.
· Who plays the PK if we have Barrie, Girard and Makar on the roster?
Girard or Makar, but the other three defensemen would probably get the vast majority of PK time. I don't think this is a valid argument for trading Barrie.
· His cap space could be spent on scoring
Agreed.
· We fill a need at forward by trading him
Agreed.
· The defense is too small with him on it
This point has been thoroughly refuted in the rest of the thread. He and Girard are the only legitimately small defensemen on the roster, and Girard has shown signs of being able to compensate for his size and still be physical.
· He’ll likely make #1 D money without being a #1 D
Probably the best argument for trading him, if true.
· He’s not good defensively
Another excellent reason to trade him.
· He’s inconsistent
Not a huge issue IMO, but a valid point.
· His role may be taken soon by Makar and/or Girard
Another good point. You could slot Makar into his role right now and probably only have a small drop in production, if any. You could do the same with Girard and have a larger drop, but better defensive ability to balance it out.
· If we trade EJ, who takes over his role?
People suggest trading EJ instead, but Ian Cole, Zadorov and Nemeth are less ideal replacements for EJ in my mind than Girard and Makar are for Barrie.
· He is likely overvalued by at least one NHL GM
Another good argument
· He’s only a powerplay specialist
He's also excellent offensively at 5 on 5 when he's on his game. Not a good point.
· We have enough good defensemen to make a good top 4 without him
Another good point. Some combo of Makar, Girard, EJ, Cole and Zadorov makes a very solid top 4 with enough puck movers and defensive ability.

Keep Barrie
· All that offense from the backend would be dominant

Barrie, Makar and Girard can't all play at once. I'd rather give Makar and Girard 20+ minutes of prime offensive minutes than have to split that time with Barrie.
· Subtracting Barrie makes us worse
This is the dumbest argument for keeping him, as if we traded him it would presumably be for equal value at least.
· We can trade him later
He's only getting older, and his value might drop if Makar/Girard steals some of his offensive minutes.
· He’s elite offensively
The best reason to keep him. He has skills from the backend very few players in the league can match. We'd definitely miss his offensive skills if we trade him.
· Makar/Girard aren’t currently ready to take over his role
They wouldn't need to completely replace him if we were also getting scoring from whoever we got in the Barrie trade.
· Makar isn’t small
This is true, and he's likely going to get bigger.
· EJ should be moved instead
He has presumably less value as he is older and doesn't put up the sexy offensive numbers Barrie does. It's also less obvious how we can replace his role as shutdown defenseman/PK specialist/minute eater. He should also still be valuable as his role diminishes as he can become a bottom pair PK guy quite easily. Barrie with a diminished role becomes almost useless.
· Trading Barrie for a forward makes no difference in terms of scoring
This is just wrong. If we trade Barrie for a forward the team overall will likely score just as many goals, but will probably let in fewer as forwards are usually less responsibly for defending, and the guy we get for Barrie might actually be better defensively than him.

Well said...

There are far too many reasons to move Barrie to maximize his value before next season. I just can’t see him getting 1D money he’s likely demanding for possibly a few years than dropping to a 2D or 3D role. Some might feel trade him, but if he’s in a diminished capacity, it’s unlikely to return anything significant. The next contract should be viewed in a condensed manner. Contract total value is for 3-4 years and the remaining term is garbage. So he would be among the highest paid in the league, even though his cap hit suggests otherwise.
 

Gatorbait19

Registered User
Apr 2, 2019
3,933
3,460
Honestly this thread should be renamed "OwenNolan argue with everyone about Barrie" because that's what it is, rather than the reasonable, mature discussion about Barrie that I think this board needs. But I don't think it should be closed - I think it should be salvaged. Because honestly the people insulting OwenNolan and complaining that the thread should be closed - those people are exactly what makes Barrie discussions so unbearable.

Anyway, in an attempt to steer this conversation into rational territory again, I read the whole thing. Here to the best of my ability, are the arguments for and against trading Barrie (and my thoughts on them)

Trade Barrie
· He’ll be 35 in 7 years

Very good point. He's likely to decline before the end of his next deal, and this should be a factor is deciding whether to sign or trade him.
· Who plays the PK if we have Barrie, Girard and Makar on the roster?
Girard or Makar, but the other three defensemen would probably get the vast majority of PK time. I don't think this is a valid argument for trading Barrie.
· His cap space could be spent on scoring
Agreed.
· We fill a need at forward by trading him
Agreed.
· The defense is too small with him on it
This point has been thoroughly refuted in the rest of the thread. He and Girard are the only legitimately small defensemen on the roster, and Girard has shown signs of being able to compensate for his size and still be physical.
· He’ll likely make #1 D money without being a #1 D
Probably the best argument for trading him, if true.
· He’s not good defensively
Another excellent reason to trade him.
· He’s inconsistent
Not a huge issue IMO, but a valid point.
· His role may be taken soon by Makar and/or Girard
Another good point. You could slot Makar into his role right now and probably only have a small drop in production, if any. You could do the same with Girard and have a larger drop, but better defensive ability to balance it out.
· If we trade EJ, who takes over his role?
People suggest trading EJ instead, but Ian Cole, Zadorov and Nemeth are less ideal replacements for EJ in my mind than Girard and Makar are for Barrie.
· He is likely overvalued by at least one NHL GM
Another good argument
· He’s only a powerplay specialist
He's also excellent offensively at 5 on 5 when he's on his game. Not a good point.
· We have enough good defensemen to make a good top 4 without him
Another good point. Some combo of Makar, Girard, EJ, Cole and Zadorov makes a very solid top 4 with enough puck movers and defensive ability.

Keep Barrie
· All that offense from the backend would be dominant

Barrie, Makar and Girard can't all play at once. I'd rather give Makar and Girard 20+ minutes of prime offensive minutes than have to split that time with Barrie.
· Subtracting Barrie makes us worse
This is the dumbest argument for keeping him, as if we traded him it would presumably be for equal value at least.
· We can trade him later
He's only getting older, and his value might drop if Makar/Girard steals some of his offensive minutes.
· He’s elite offensively
The best reason to keep him. He has skills from the backend very few players in the league can match. We'd definitely miss his offensive skills if we trade him.
· Makar/Girard aren’t currently ready to take over his role
They wouldn't need to completely replace him if we were also getting scoring from whoever we got in the Barrie trade.
· Makar isn’t small
This is true, and he's likely going to get bigger.
· EJ should be moved instead
He has presumably less value as he is older and doesn't put up the sexy offensive numbers Barrie does. It's also less obvious how we can replace his role as shutdown defenseman/PK specialist/minute eater. He should also still be valuable as his role diminishes as he can become a bottom pair PK guy quite easily. Barrie with a diminished role becomes almost useless.
· Trading Barrie for a forward makes no difference in terms of scoring
This is just wrong. If we trade Barrie for a forward the team overall will likely score just as many goals, but will probably let in fewer as forwards are usually less responsibly for defending, and the guy we get for Barrie might actually be better defensively than him.

I agree with most of your points/arguments and think this is probably the best summarization of the arguments in the debate.

Re: the size issue with Makar / Girard / Barrie. You’re right that it isn’t a size issue, but it is more of a physicality issue. Not saying it’s impossible to have the 3 of those guys, but history seems to demonstrate that you do need physicality back there.

I Do think the Bruins’ current makeup is a decent comparison, so let’s compare their smallish Dmen - McAvoy / Krug / Grezylck - to ours.

Lets say McAvoy = Makar. That means Krug / Grezylck are our Barrie / Girard. Grezylck is a 3rd pairing D (which neither Barrie nor Girard are). Krug, despite being a big offensive weapon, is still extremely physical as dictated by his play last night.

Maybe Girard is a little more physical than we give him credit for. Barrie we know is not physical. Barrie is similar in terms of offense to Krug, but nowhere near his physicality. Girard is a good defender, and can play physically sometimes, but I’m not envisioning him laying someone out like Krug did last night.

While the physicality/size aspect may have been a bit overblown here, it’s an important point to consider, particularly in light of the fact that we’re considering sinking $7-9m/year for 5-8 years on a one dimensional player that is the worst defender on our team.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad