It was a terrible pick from the outset, but I thought he could at least have a Lazar like career, that seems like a pipedream at this point.
It's "understandable" (albiet, very dumb) to see what they were thinking with the pick, but it's not a great look
They either:
Had zero confidence in their scouting during a covid year (which is an absolute farce of an opinion on that draft, there was tons and tons of hockey to scout) and took what they considered was a safe guy who could fill a role.
or
They legitimately thought Boucher was a guy who fit the bill for a 10th overall from their scouting (which would be funny because he played less than pretty much everyone)
The Sens desperately, DESPERATELY, need to bring some new blood in at the top of the scouting department. The fact it wasn't addressed this summer is concerning, their process needs a complete overhaul.
The past 3 drafts the Sens have 7 forwards pllaying in the CHL/USHL/NCAA. Those guys combined have (Never counted Oskar Petterson and Stephen Halliday as they are guys playing pro, have 8 points in 24 games, Halliday was am offenisve star in NCAA):
92GP 22g 21a 43p
That is absolutely horrendous. Sens need to deviate from drafting toolsy guys who aren't very good at hockey right now who they hope develop, to drafting guys who are actually good players now we cann develop despite their tools not being as good as the big athletic guys. O'Neil and Dyck are two more guys drafted out of subpar leagues.