Player Discussion Tuukka Rask - Part 2 (MOD # 598)

Status
Not open for further replies.

SPLBRUIN

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
12,331
12,502
If this is another choke, and it looks like it is, you have to move on from this guy in the off season if you want to expect something different to happen in the tough times going forward. They need to be in a different place mentally, there's no reason to have confidence in him down the stretch.

Sweeney will have to be creative to unload that albatross of a contract, but he just has to do it. He is a train wreck in big games, so sick of his disappearing act. Hopefully we can find a buyer, Rask does not lack in talent, he is just mentally weak.
 

AlpineLager

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
1,626
397
New Brunswick
steve+mason+sieve+shooter+tutor+sucks+columbus+goalie.jpg
 

Ten Thousand Hours

Registered User
Aug 17, 2010
8,145
0
Boston
Comically mentally weak goaltender.

Why does everyone think it's mental and not just a physically tired 30-year-old who hasn't been elite in 3 years playing like a physically tired non-elite 30-year-old?

Don't blame him for getting paid. And don't expect him to save our season. He's not good enough. Hasn't been for some time.
 

Daishi

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
2,243
395
Sparkling .815 sv % today.

5 goals on 27 shots, elite talent.

I'll just chime in here by saying Rask had a bad game today, and he hasn't been playing up to his potential recently.

That said, posts like yours are offensive. Players have ups and downs. Bergeron is MIA. DK is MIA. We have two players on the whole team that pass the eye test most of the time in Marchand and Pasta.

How do you think Rask got his contract? Because he's an elite talent. How do you think he won his Vezina and his olympic medal? Because he's an elite talent.

He's an elite talent that's not playing well now. Playing poorly and being an elite talent are not mutually exclusive. Is is really that hard to comprehend?

The Bruins can move on from Rask, but there's a very real possibility he'll find his game again on another NHL club and become an elite goalie there once again. Who will we replace him with that gives us a better chance to succeed? Make no mistake, 7M for a starting goalie isn't that much. This team needs a Price, but a Price will cost 10M. That's what his upcoming contract will be like. Hank costs 8.5M, and his backup in Raanta is playing just as well. A Jimmy Howard would cost 5.3M. A Mike Smith would cost 6.3M. Are you saying that with the 700K-1.5M in cap savings we'd be a drastically better team? Who will that 1M buy? Or are you saying we should just roll the dice with some rookies who play for less than 2M AAV? Is that a long term strategy? Either the rookies fail miserably and probably cost you your job in management, or they pan out and you have to give them 7M. See how that works?

The whole squad is filled with free riders who aren't contributing, and if you really want change you have to start by ridding yourself of Cam Neely. If you want to go further, ship DK, Rask and Chara out too, but at least it's helpful if we're being honest about the facts here instead of just screaming 'RASK SUCKS' and leaving it there.
 

Hopedalebru

Registered User
Mar 21, 2017
133
0
I'll just chime in here by saying Rask had a bad game today, and he hasn't been playing up to his potential recently.

That said, posts like yours are offensive. Players have ups and downs. Bergeron is MIA. DK is MIA. We have two players on the whole team that pass the eye test most of the time in Marchand and Pasta.

How do you think Rask got his contract? Because he's an elite talent. How do you think he won his Vezina and his olympic medal? Because he's an elite talent.

He's an elite talent that's not playing well now. Playing poorly and being an elite talent are not mutually exclusive. Is is really that hard to comprehend?

The Bruins can move on from Rask, but there's a very real possibility he'll find his game again on another NHL club and become an elite goalie there once again. Who will we replace him with that gives us a better chance to succeed? Make no mistake, 7M for a starting goalie isn't that much. This team needs a Price, but a Price will cost 10M. A Jimmy Howard would cost 5.3M. A Mike Smith would cost 6.3M. Are you saying that with the 700K-1.5M in cap savings we'd be a drastically better team? Who will that 1M buy?

The whole squad is filled with free riders who aren't contributing, and if you really want change you have to start by ridding yourself of Cam Neely. If you want to go further, ship DK, Rask and Chara out too, but at least it's helpful if we're being honest about the facts here instead of just screaming 'RASK SUCKS' and leaving it there.

But he does suck.
 

Daishi

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
2,243
395
Rask has an .842 save percentage during this current 4 game losing streak.

Carey Price just had .864 SV% in today's loss against the Canes. I guess it's time for the Habs to ship him out. He hasn't brought the Cup to Montreal, so what good is he for?
 

SPLBRUIN

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
12,331
12,502
I'll just chime in here by saying Rask had a bad game today, and he hasn't been playing up to his potential recently.

That said, posts like yours are offensive. Players have ups and downs. Bergeron is MIA. DK is MIA. We have two players on the whole team that pass the eye test most of the time in Marchand and Pasta.

How do you think Rask got his contract? Because he's an elite talent. How do you think he won his Vezina and his olympic medal? Because he's an elite talent.

He's an elite talent that's not playing well now. Playing poorly and being an elite talent are not mutually exclusive. Is is really that hard to comprehend?

The Bruins can move on from Rask, but there's a very real possibility he'll find his game again on another NHL club and become an elite goalie there once again. Who will we replace him with that gives us a better chance to succeed? Make no mistake, 7M for a starting goalie isn't that much. This team needs a Price, but a Price will cost 10M. That's what his upcoming contract will be like. Hank costs 8.5M, and his backup in Raanta is playing just as well. A Jimmy Howard would cost 5.3M. A Mike Smith would cost 6.3M. Are you saying that with the 700K-1.5M in cap savings we'd be a drastically better team? Who will that 1M buy? Or are you saying we should just roll the dice with some rookies who play for less than 2M AAV? Is that a long term strategy? Either the rookies fail miserably and probably cost you your job in management, or they pan out and you have to give them 7M. See how that works?

The whole squad is filled with free riders who aren't contributing, and if you really want change you have to start by ridding yourself of Cam Neely. If you want to go further, ship DK, Rask and Chara out too, but at least it's helpful if we're being honest about the facts here instead of just screaming 'RASK SUCKS' and leaving it there.

The numbers don't lie, Rask is no longer even close to an elite goalie, in fact I'm not sure he is even an average goalie anymore. Time to pawn this overrated overpaid goalie on some other team.
 

Daishi

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
2,243
395
The numbers don't lie, Rask is no longer even close to an elite goalie, in fact I'm not sure he is even an average goalie anymore. Time to pawn this overrated overpaid goalie on some other team.

He was in the Vezina conversation until Christmas. Dig up the posts from the first half of the year. We all thought he was carrying the team. He was voted to the all star game.

Now he's playing bad, but the hyperbole here is getting a little obnoxious. I guess I'll just **** off.
 

What The Puck

Future GM
Feb 12, 2014
2,593
237
Northeast
The numbers don't lie, Rask is no longer even close to an elite goalie, in fact I'm not sure he is even an average goalie anymore. Time to pawn this overrated overpaid goalie on some other team.

It can be done, but we're going to have to eat some of the salary. And I doubt we will get much of anything for a 30-year-old goalie who hasn't been elite in a long time.
 

Bruinfanatic

Registered User
Apr 22, 2016
13,628
10,454
Ontario
Can they leave him unprotected for,expansion draft.Maybee Vegas would take him.Come on for 7.5 mil Bruins should be able to get a decent goalie,not even sure I would call Rask decent.
 

Pia8988

Registered User
May 26, 2014
14,659
9,232
If only there was some incident where he went from elite level to bad at some point during the year. Maybe having to do with a shot to took up high and left a game. Makes you wonder.
 

Hali33

Registered User
Oct 18, 2013
10,746
2,290
Halifax, Nova Scotia
If only there was some incident where he went from elite level to bad at some point during the year. Maybe having to do with a shot to took up high and left a game. Makes you wonder.

Not unless he took that shot last year when his goaltending did the same thing with the pressure on down the stretch.
 

Hamilton Brian

Registered User
Apr 12, 2004
4,206
704
Hamilton, ON
If only there was some incident where he went from elite level to bad at some point during the year. Maybe having to do with a shot to took up high and left a game. Makes you wonder.

Meh! That would have/should have been dealt with. Thing is...he has not been solid when he's needed to be. He's bringing back memories of BlaineLacher/1996-7Ranford!!!!

There...eat that Tuuka!!! How's that make you feel?
 

Pia8988

Registered User
May 26, 2014
14,659
9,232
Sounds like just a bunch of emotional responses to a losing streak to be honest.
 

Hamilton Brian

Registered User
Apr 12, 2004
4,206
704
Hamilton, ON
Sounds like just a bunch of emotional responses to a losing streak to be honest.

But is it just a losing streak? Can we draw some correlations? Is this guy really the guy to go forward with? If so, then what does that say about the defense? Wait...that's been covered before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad