Whileee
Registered User
- May 29, 2010
- 46,538
- 34,966
What was Trouba asking for again? Oh that's right... 8x7m. Yeah he's going to make more than Maatta. As for how it will affect PITs cap, every penny he makes that's over Maatta's 4m is less money to sign Dumoulin and Bonino or the other depth players that just allowed Crosby and company to win their 2nd cup. He could sign a contract at 5m and while it may be a great contract down the road, it still means we're losing someone due to the impending cap crunch. This is a team with 4 players with cap hits over 6.8m. That means we need to be very smart with how the rest of our roster is constructed, which means moving very good players on very good long term contracts is a really stupid ****ing thing to do - even if it means getting a slightly better player back.
On a side note I love how Connor is now a "potential 1st line winger". lol. How about we let him play at least 1 pro game before annotating him a 1st line winger?
I see this meme from a single questionable article has survived and multiplied. Trouba's agent immediately and directly refuted the information in the article regarding Trouba's contract request. Moreover, that same article also missed Byfuglien's actual contract value by 40%.
Trouba will get more than Maatta because he has higher value than Maatta. It's as simple as that.
"Potential" means just what it says. I don't think many knowledgeable hockey people would dispute that Connor has 1st line potential. He's widely considered one of the top prospects in hockey, and he's a winger. Top prospects usually are considered to have "1st line potential".