I’m okay with this if we are moving out holl, Maatta and petry.
Oh I know he does lol, it’s why I don’t think I’m good with this. Would way rather just sign RoyWtf is Stevie doing
Petry has a NTC
They should be giving something to us based on how hard it is to move money (yzerman’s words)And what would we have to give up?
I would take him and a pick back with 4m retained...They should be giving something to us based on how hard it is to move money (yzerman’s words)
They will retain some moneyThey should be giving something to us based on how hard it is to move money (yzerman’s words)
He just turned 30 not really 'old' but he is just a name IMO. I wouldn't want him unless we get a prospect and they retain 4-5MAn old and slow 4 to 6 dman, albeit physical,, is not what this team needs
It sure would be funny though if thats exactly what ends up happeningIn the article it says they are vying for Stamkos and Kane as are we. I don't want the ghost of Trouba to kick us out of targeting these two!
SY needs to inject some actual talent into this roster.. I'm not saying he still can't or won't, but moves like this if true, coupled with every single one outside of Debrincat suggest that's not his MO(Kane was a free gift for 4 months)We would still have space to go after Kane or Stamkos, though I think Kane was a bit of a square peg in a round hole here.
Yeah, I can see him being a good partner for Ed. Hopefully a substantial chunk of salary is being retained.Love this if true, hard player to play against, perfect partner for Edvinsson
I agree but that basically means we traded Walman to add more salary for Trouba and might hurt us getting a big FA2 years at 5.5 per would not be bad
Plus I think L-Simon and R-Trouba could work out really well together