Unbiased Fan
Registered User
- May 24, 2019
- 3,808
- 1,809
I wonder if there is a worse goalie in the NHL at this time then Gibson.
Exactly. The idea that a trade would happen now is a complete non-starter. Jarry just committed his prime to the team, and vice-versa.Wasn't Jarry just a UFA?
When's the last time (or first) a team signed an unrestricted free agent to a 5+ year deal (or any deal) and traded them a month or two later?
Gibson has 4 years left on his deal, even at 50% that's a caphit of 3.2 million. I can guarantee you that it's not going to happen with Jarry here.Exactly. The idea that a trade would happen now is a complete non-starter. Jarry just committed his prime to the team, and vice-versa.
Personally, I think it was a mistake that the Pens extended Jarry. But what's done is done. The Pens now either live or die with him, barring a career-altering injury situation.
Now, if Gibson is somehow available during the season for pennies on the dollar, at 50% value, then I'd love to add him to platoon with Jarry, and have an experienced option. But clearly, from the reactions of Ducks fans here (and in other threads) that is just not going to happen...
Shane diesel in a gibson thread color me shockedYou need to understand Gibson is such a unicorn the stats can't be used for reference. Gibson is in such a unique situation all the stats, advanced and standard, are too biased to give you a real assessment.
Jarry: 5 x 5.375
Carter: 1 x 3.125
Gibson: 4 x 6.4
The Penguins would save a much needed $2.1M on the cap this year, while getting an upgrade (albeit minor) in net.
The ducks have plenty of space this season. They take on $2.1M extra this year, but actually save $1.025M going forward swapping Gibson for Jarry once Carter is off the books. Jarry is younger as well, so he can be around for the rebuild.
So the question is what do the Pens have to add here? I really don’t think the gap between Jarry and Gibson is all that big (I know that has been debated on this platform), but we would have to pay Anaheim to take Carter. Does adding Pickering cover the difference? If not what does? Yager would be off the table. Not that he’s necessarily untouchable but he’s simply too valuable to be the difference in this particular deal.
For argument sake let’s say Carter waives. He’s no stranger to Southern California I think if there’s a team he waives for ANA would be on the list. And honestly I think he knows Pitt doesn’t want him anymore. And yes I know we just re-signed Jarry but Dubas clearly wants to win and if he feels he can upgrade at goalie I believe he will.
Let’s discuss
Not since '18-'19.
'19-'20 to Present
Gibson - GAA: 3.32, SV%: .902
Jarry - GAA: 2.62, SV%: .915
Jarry's also younger. If it's between he and Gibson, I'll run with Jarry. If he doesn't get the job done, there's always the deadline.
Just glad to be here with my Duck friends.Shane diesel in a gibson thread color me shocked
Go check GSAx.Gee, I wonder how those stats would be different if Jarry were in Anaheim and Gibson was in Pittsburgh?
Why the hell are we giving up a top prospect to get rid of a contract that 1) May go LTIR anyway 2) only brings minimal upgrade if any 3) Jeff Carter probably won’t waive for Anaheim?Pickering. But the also the purpose of the thread was to discuss what Anaheim would want as an add on
Thing about this is Pittsburgh has been a substantially better team than Anaheim for nearly a decade. Gibson’s numbers are bound to look worse. I think he is more talented and would win more games in Pittsburgh than Jarry would.
Again I agree the gap is small, but an upgrade nonetheless plus dumping Carter is an attractive idea to me.
I don't know. I do know that the difference in stats is significant enough over a significant period that I wouldn't bet on team being the only factor.Gee, I wonder how those stats would be different if Jarry were in Anaheim and Gibson was in Pittsburgh?
You need to understand Gibson is such a unicorn the stats can't be used for reference. Gibson is in such a unique situation all the stats, advanced and standard, are too biased to give you a real assessment.