Player Discussion Trevor Zegras : Part III

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I've seen him be careless with his stick when he get's mad, but never really seen him throw a hit like that

3 games? I mean sure
 
Not shocking. It's a bad hit. We want Zegras to play with fire in his game but not play with fire with others' health and get stupid results like this that harm the team. Oh well. We press on.
 
It's pretty close to the Cogs hit but worse so 3 games makes sense i suppose. Maybe we already had a baseline 2 game suspension from Parros and now the Getzlaf tax adds another game.

Pretty dumb hit and I have no idea how the refs didn't call anything on the ice.
 
I'm not upset at the suspension, the term is a game longer than I feel it should, but what I'm really upset at is no suspension or even a hearing for chiarot. Then again I shouldn't be surprised the ducks get screwed when it comes to officiating.... And the wings get a free pass.
 
1st time suspension gets 3 games ???? Of course it happened against the RedWings who always seem to have the DOPS working for them since 2007.

I heard it's because this was the second for Zegras, he's also been fined once. Lilleberg was a first time offender.
To my knowledge Zegras has never been suspended before. That is what 1st time offender 'should' mean but that they consider previous fines to be on level with a suspension is nuts to me. So a guy who yells at the ref (hurt refs feelings) and gets a fine is equal in terms of 1st time offense as someone elbowing someone and getting suspended for it.
 
1st time suspension gets 3 games ???? Of course it happened against the RedWings who always seem to have the DOPS working for them since 2007.


To my knowledge Zegras has never been suspended before. That is what 1st time offender 'should' mean but that they consider previous fines to be on level with a suspension is nuts to me. So a guy who yells at the ref (hurt refs feelings) and gets a fine is equal in terms of 1st time offense as someone elbowing someone and getting suspended for it.

I mean this is the exact hit they’re trying to get out of the game. Don’t put the DOPSHIT in that situation.
 
Not surprising, figured he'd be suspended soon as I saw the hit. Exact sort of hit the NHL hates.

Also going to be honest, I don't see a world where Chiarot is anywhere close to a suspension. Cheapshot sure, but isn't really in the same realm as Zegras hit. A fine at absolute best.
 
Not surprising, figured he'd be suspended soon as I saw the hit. Exact sort of hit the NHL hates.

Also going to be honest, I don't see a world where Chiarot is anywhere close to a suspension. Cheapshot sure, but isn't really in the same realm as Zegras hit. A fine at absolute best.
if the league wants to eliminate ALL cheap headshots, then Chiarot's cheap shot to Frank's head should be punished as well. shouldn't be picking and choosing which cheap headshots are ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ff8
if the league wants to eliminate ALL cheap headshots, then Chiarot's cheap shot to Frank's head should be punished as well. shouldn't be picking and choosing which cheap headshots are ok.
That's why it should have been a fine. It was a cheapshot, not close to being suspension worthy. They were not close to being the same thing.
 
Zegras is kind of a moron. I kinda like him and would kinda be fine with him being traded at the same time

Weird situation IMO
I don't think anybody is really their brightest in the heat of the moment, and being a professional athlete is kind of like being in the heat of the moment nonstop.

Trading him would be the biggest mistake this franchise has made in over a decade
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deuce22


Even though I would give most improved to Lacombe it is very nice praise.

Also find it interesting that the angle he’s taking is praising zegras for his improvement rather than focusing on accountability for the bad hit.

It's also self-serving of Cronin to make this point about Z because Z is the player where Cronin's influence is most obvious and most obviously needs justification.
 
I don't think anybody is really their brightest in the heat of the moment, and being a professional athlete is kind of like being in the heat of the moment nonstop.

Trading him would be the biggest mistake this franchise has made in over a decade
That’s a strange statement since it would entirely depend on the return.
 
The problem with DOPs is even though their VP has a Princeton education they use a grade school mentality to decide which hits are bad.

It seems to be based on injury, not on the actual hit. Which basically translates to the ability of someone to withstand the violent contact and not the violent contact itself.

This is the biggest fallacy in contact sports. Some athletes sustain brain damage playing that doesn’t appear until years down the road.

DOPS isn’t really concerned about removing dangerous hits, it is about the low hanging fruit.

John
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad