mulefarm
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2011
- 1,385
- 365
If he gets claimed, yes. Which he won’t be.Great asset management. Lets just toss some more talent and receive nothing in return.
I disagree with this. I don’t think Engvall is excellent defensively nor do I see him as an excellent skater. Just okay at both.He can't skate or keep up defensively, while Engvall is excellent at both.
Another one of Dubas' value signings being sent overboard. If somebody took Vesey, somebody will take Boyd. At some point Dubas needs to admit that he cannot build a team with 4 forwards taking up 1/2 the cap, especially with one of them playing like he has aged 5 years since the start of the season.
What?
What?
and things like "HUGE" mistake...its laughablehaha here come the Dubas haters to tell everyone about the bad asset management in losing a 4th line depth player.
Leaf fans are amazing.
hey dubas need some depth in case of injuries man. don't get this move? did boyd asked to be traded or what?
Having so much depth that we're forced to waive viable NHL players is evidence that we don't have enough depth. Science!
and things like "HUGE" mistake...its laughable
Now now , let’s not get overly excited thereHe can't skate or keep up defensively, while Engvall is excellent at both.
I'll be honest I still really don't see it with Engvall. Maybe at times but overall, not really. He's just ok