Jim Bob
RIP RJ
Yes.
This is about a better Gabe Davis and not making the offense markedly more explosive and better at RAC.
Yes.
I wasn’t a huge fan of the Davis pick. Johnson did fine is the role the Bills are drafting Davis to play. I would’ve rather had Vaki, who would’ve been a core special teamer who could play defense and running back.Generally liked day 3 - I can almost taste the tears from the mouth breathers who are no doubt still freaking out about WRs.
Davis:
To be honest he wasn't my first choice for getting a back (Estime was). I'd have also taken TJ Tampa here given that he was my BPA & a very good fit. Grabbing a back made sense though given the run on them. Don't know much about him but seems to be more of an all rounder thsn a short yardage hammer.
Van Pran:
Probably my favourite pick of the day. They needed to draft a C & this guy was not supposed to be on the board at this stage. I could see him being a day 1 starter if the McGovern experiment doesn't work.
Ulofoshio:
One of only two picks i didn't really like. Tough because i know nothing about the player - but seems to project as a STer. I didn't see LB as much of a need. I was annoyed at Ainias Smith going a few picks earlier.
Solomon:
Another one i really liked. I'd looked into him after their meetings with him (these are the lower round guys I tend to do more research on). Needed a faster / more explosive pass rusher to add to the mix even if he isn't an every down player.
Grable:
Didn't really like this pick. Nothing against the player - he's really intriguing. But i doubt he's a candidate to make the roster & another team could grab him on waivers. I would have tried to trade for another '25 pick here.
Hardy:
They absolutely needed a good returner & after Smith went off the board this guy might have been the best one available. He should make the roster based on this alone - so it's a worthwhile pick.
Clayton:
@HOOats gets the credit for this one. Being English i obviously love it - but looking at it objectively i don't know how you can hate it, given the IPP roster exemptions. The fact he was there in Detroit meant that somebody was going to draft him, i doubt he'd have been available as a UDFA. Rooting HARD for this guy to make it.
So Cephus was the one they worked out. There is your speed element
Gonna be the new Duke Williams hero in campSo Cephus was the one they worked out. There is your speed element
Bills GM explains why he only drafted 1 receiver & why a WR trade isn’t coming
Beane: "We just felt those (other) positions were bigger needs when we took them."www.newyorkupstate.com
“If we could get Deebo here for under that, I’d do it,” he said, tongue in cheek. “But I don’t think that’s realistic. You’re looking at all these new deals, whether it’s his name or someone else that’s potentially on the trade market. Look at all these new deals recently. They’re hovering around $30 million (per season). So, trying to fit that in with everything we’re doing, I’m not sure if it is reality right now.”
Buffalo Bills signing wide receiver that missed 2023 season due to gambling suspension
WR Quintez Cephus worked out for the Bills on Saturday.www.syracuse.com
Is he known for speed? I thought I read he ran a 4.6 40?So Cephus was the one they worked out. There is your speed element
Because the reality of rolling the dice on a 4th-7th round WR in this draft is that it really isn't much of a difference?Seems like all the more reason to take multiple shots at WR in what was called a deep draft at WR.
Again, why not just draft another WR instead of signing this guy?
Is he known for speed? I thought I read he ran a 4.6 40?
I think I might be wrong, there was a wide out on the Lions a few years ago who was pure speed, didn't get a lot of looks... My badSeems like all the more reason to take multiple shots at WR in what was called a deep draft at WR.
Again, why not just draft another WR instead of signing this guy?
Is he known for speed? I thought I read he ran a 4.6 40?
While I prefer Legette’s style, I think Coleman is a much better prospect, if for nothing else their ages. What was Legette up to when he was Coleman’s age? If not for getting an extra year because of Covid, Legette doesn’t even get drafted.I would’ve stayed at 32 and took Legette. I think he’s a better receiver than Coleman.
I’m not Beane and don’t have a scouting staff. But Legette is way more explosive than Coleman, and the Bills could’ve used him. Between him, Samuel, and Shakir, they wouldn’t really have a set X, Z, or slot. Which I think would’ve been a great set up.
I see Coleman as Colston and Thomas in New Orleans. If we start seeing Beane add a bunch of speedy receivers around Kincaid, Knox, and Coleman, we’ll know that he’s drafting to what Brady plans to implement.
Maybe we’re looking in different spots, but I’m not seeing a lot of people complaining about Coleman’s 40 time. I am seeing a lot of straw manning about 40 time though.I think the vast majority of people are putting FAR too much importance on 40yd times.
It was mentioned on the draft broadcast - but while Coleman set one of the slowest 40yd times at the combine - he also set THE fastest time of anyone in the Gauntlet drill - which is probably a better indicator of success at the NFL level. He also timed pretty well in all the route drills according to the GPS data. If you want a precedent for this... Puka Nacua did something very similar last year.
Someone needs to find him a decent barber now he's in Buffalo though...
I was curious, so decided to do a comparison myself for all the QBs that went in that range.While I prefer Legette’s style, I think Coleman is a much better prospect, if for nothing else their ages. What was Legette up to when he was Coleman’s age? If not for getting an extra year because of Covid, Legette doesn’t even get drafted.
Age 18 | Age 19 | Age 20 | Age 21 | Age 22 | |
Worthy | 12 | 13 | 14 | Rookie | NFL 2 |
Legette | 11 | 6 | 11 | 13 | 12 |
Coleman | 10 | 12 | 12 | Rookie | NFL 2 |
McConkey | RS | 15 | 15 | 9 | Rookie |
Age 18 | Age 19 | Age 20 | Age 21 | Age 22 | |
Worthy | 62 | 60 | 75 | Rookie | NFL 2 |
Legette | 9 | 7 | 8 | 18 | 71 |
Coleman | 7 | 58 | 50 | Rookie | NFL 2 |
McConkey | RS | 31 | 58 | 30 | Rookie |
Age 18 | Age 19 | Age 20 | Age 21 | Age 22 | |
Worthy | 981 | 760 | 1014 | Rookie | NFL 2 |
Legette | 80 | 113 | 63 | 167 | 1255 |
Coleman | 50 | 798 | 658 | Rookie | NFL 2 |
McConkey | RS | 447 | 762 | 478 | Rookie |
Age 18 | Age 19 | Age 20 | Age 21 | Age 22 | |
Worthy | 12 | 9 | 5 | Rookie | NFL 2 |
Legette | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Coleman | 1 | 7 | 11 | Rookie | NFL 2 |
McConkey | RS | 5 | 7 | 2 | Rookie |
Because the reality of rolling the dice on a 4th-7th round WR in this draft is that it really isn't much of a difference?
I just think some are being short-sighted and so intently focused on this seasons WR room, when Coleman, Shakir, Samuel, Hollins, (X) with Kincaid/Knox/Cook can get it done with Josh. That's my opinion at least.
And there still is post June 1 option to replace the (X) (Chark, Boyd, Hardmn etc etc who will probably be more likely to contribute this season than another rookie).
They also have a boatload of picks next year and a lot more cap to play with to address WR, whereas that 2nd WR picked this year might not even be around for long big picture wise. That's my take.
Why?I still think another body may be coming. If one of Shakir or Coleman goes down with even a minor injury, plus there's rotating guys in and out (See Diggs playing 45-65% of snaps very often), then you've got 3rd and 7 and you have Samuel Hollins and Shorter on the field to get it done.
No we wouldn't.I don’t put any importance on the 40, every skill player in the league can run fast and it’s all very close to the same fast. I want the guy who can be tricky and creative on the way to catching the ball every time, and I think Keon is that guy. I think Ladd is that guy too, we should have packaged a few picks to go back to back Keon and Ladd, we would all be partying hard right now.
I guess thinking about it in terms of what we've replaced in terms of snaps:I still think another body may be coming. If one of Shakir or Coleman goes down with even a minor injury, plus there's rotating guys in and out (See Diggs playing 45-65% of snaps very often), then you've got 3rd and 7 and you have Samuel Hollins and Shorter on the field to get it done.
Because the reality of rolling the dice on a 4th-7th round WR in this draft is that it really isn't much of a difference?
I just think some are being short-sighted and so intently focused on this seasons WR room, when Coleman, Shakir, Samuel, Hollins, (X) with Kincaid/Knox/Cook can get it done with Josh. That's my opinion at least.
And there still is post June 1 option to replace the (X) (Chark, Boyd, Hardmn etc etc who will probably be more likely to contribute this season than another rookie).
They also have a boatload of picks next year and a lot more cap to play with to address WR, whereas that 2nd WR picked this year might not even be around for long big picture wise. That's my take.