ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 78,317
- 45,528
He's certainly in the debate.MAC is best player in league bottom line .. Cup winner .. controls virtually every game he plays
He's certainly in the debate.MAC is best player in league bottom line .. Cup winner .. controls virtually every game he plays
Your mind reading is really a window to another world of thought. "Blue chippers"?Well, that's not what you implied. You said the cap is a disaster, yet every single player on the team provides value at their dollar amount and the team is set up not to have any veteran deals blocking the way for the Matthews extension year. Oh, and they have blue chippers busting down the door to play on this team. Hmm. Seems like a good problem to have.
MAC is best player in league bottom line .. Cup winner .. controls virtually every game he plays
He may be da only all round player left in league who can do it all .. blow by everyone with speed on another level .. shoot harder on fly than anyone else he competes with .. fight for loose pucks harder than anyone else he competes with .. win a faceoff .. score a goal when team needs it most .. block a shot when game on da line .. consummately team guy in every respect .. this is what leadership is all about .. i can't think of another guy playing today in his prime who is even remotely close .. maybe Syd da kid in his day thats itNo he isn’t. He’s very good, but calling him the best player in the league is a bit of a stretch.
You really need to stop digging. This is far from the truth. Mack is a great player, but this is all sunshine, rainbows, and lollipops.He may be da only all round player left in league who can do it all .. blow by everyone with speed on another level .. shoot harder on fly than anyone else he competes with .. fight for loose pucks harder than anyone else he competes with .. win a faceoff .. score a goal when team needs it most .. block a shot when game on da line .. consummately team guy in every respect .. this is what leadership is all about .. i can't think of another guy playing today in his prime who is even remotely close .. maybe Syd da kid in his day thats it
Teams need 1 guy to carry da freight when times get tough .. MAC puts team on his back and makes it happen whatever da need when da time requires .. that is true leadershipYou really need to stop digging. This is far from the truth. Mack is a great player, but this is all sunshine, rainbows, and lollipops.
I question your hockey knowledge as much as I question your baseball knowledge. A team based victory has no bearing on an individual player
Produces at a higher rate than he does in the regular season. Only once has he not been over a PPG in the playoffs and he was still a PPG.Teams need 1 guy to carry da freight when times get tough .. MAC puts team on his back and makes it happen whatever da need when da time requires .. that is true leadership
You literally just described Auston Matthews to a tee.He may be da only all round player left in league who can do it all .. blow by everyone with speed on another level .. shoot harder on fly than anyone else he competes with .. fight for loose pucks harder than anyone else he competes with .. win a faceoff .. score a goal when team needs it most .. block a shot when game on da line .. consummately team guy in every respect .. this is what leadership is all about .. i can't think of another guy playing today in his prime who is even remotely close .. maybe Syd da kid in his day thats it
Apparently, it was Jarnkrok that put them in this situation. They knew they couldn't afford him but couldn't resist a player of his calibre coming here for less than Engvall for 4 years.I am not talking bargains. If MM deserves $10,500,000 it is Dubas job to get it for $10,400,000 to keep the team out of a $4 situation. Robertson is a Marlie because of this type of planning.
When Matty learns to blow by Bergeron then we can start to have a conversation .. when Berge takes your lunch well what can i say .. there is not even a remote chance Matty keeps up to MAC in any puck race in any position on da ice .. even with a lead MAC still wins every race every time .. you should look at their training camp speed times .. dude Willy Rielly Kerfoot are far far faster than MattyYou literally just described Auston Matthews to a tee.
There's more to hockey than straight line speed. We're not talking about speed skating. We're talking about who's better at hockey. The answer is easily Matthews. No contest.When Matty learns to blow by Bergeron then we can start to have a conversation .. when Berge takes your lunch well what can i say .. there is not even a remote chance Matty keeps up to MAC in any puck race in any position on da ice .. even with a lead MAC still wins every race every time .. you should look at their training camp speed times .. dude Willy Rielly Kerfoot are far far faster than Matty
You are going way way out there on a limb my friend .. you line up Matty v MAC at centre ice faceoff .. drop a puck and put 2 Vasi's in each net .. and it is an almost certainty that MAC scores 1st .. Matty likely does not even get a shot on net .. he won't be able to skate away .. he can't over power MAC .. he may be able to deke him once here and there but would be caught in a stride or two .. it is not even a fair fight .. McJesus would score a couple times in a 10 game match but even he doesn't have da fight in himThere's more to hockey than straight line speed. We're not talking about speed skating. We're talking about who's better at hockey. The answer is easily Matthews. No contest.
What exactly was his excuse for all the years before 2022?You are going way way out there on a limb my friend .. you line up Matty v MAC at centre ice faceoff .. drop a puck and put 2 Vasi's in each net .. and it is an almost certainty that MAC scores 1st .. Matty likely does not even get a shot on net .. he won't be able to skate away .. he can't over power MAC .. he may be able to deke him once here and there but would be caught in a stride or two .. it is not even a fair fight .. McJesus would score a couple times in a 10 game match but even he doesn't have da fight in him
If you lined up Matthews vs. Mackinnon at center ice 1v1, Matthews would unquestionably be the better bet to score first. Matthews would win the faceoff with his elite faceoff abilities, and prevent Mackinnon from getting the puck with his elite puck protection abilities, before he sniped it top corner with the best shot on the world. And if Mackinnon ever did end up with the puck, Matthews would crush him into the boards with his elite physicality or just steal the puck with his elite takeaway ability.You are going way way out there on a limb my friend .. you line up Matty v MAC at centre ice faceoff .. drop a puck and put 2 Vasi's in each net .. and it is an almost certainty that MAC scores 1st .. Matty likely does not even get a shot on net .. he won't be able to skate away .. he can't over power MAC .. he may be able to deke him once here and there but would be caught in a stride or two .. it is not even a fair fight .. McJesus would score a couple times in a 10 game match but even he doesn't have da fight in him
I should not get into hockey skill matters with people who have never laced em up at elite level .. but you did give me a great LOL with your description .. fact is there would not be a damn thing Matty could do except watch MAC skate with puck .. you can't use any of his skills when you can't get a puck .. it would literally be a complete skate around and shot and then race for a puck and then another shot and then another race for a puck and another shot .. and it does happen a lot in tournaments .. in fact at beanpot i was on bench when Mitch and Matty had a go after 5 sets of OT with a Toronto team and Boston Jr Bruins (which was a US all star team) .. fact was Mitch never even touched da puck once .. it took Matty 3 shots to finally score and win game for Boston .. speed wise no comparison between Matty and Mitch and guess what Mitch did not get a puck .. speed and will/strength decide these type of battles .. it is why for many many many years when I was growing up these skilled US teams never won a damn thing ever even though they looked brilliant in da warmup .. but over time many Canadians have moved down south to build USA hockey and their kids have brought more of warrior culture to many USA programsIf you lined up Matthews vs. Mackinnon at center ice 1v1, Matthews would unquestionably be the better bet to score first. Matthews would win the faceoff with his elite faceoff abilities, and prevent Mackinnon from getting the puck with his elite puck protection abilities, before he sniped it top corner with the best shot on the world. And if Mackinnon ever did end up with the puck, Matthews would crush him into the boards with his elite physicality or just steal the puck with his elite takeaway ability.
Though I'm not sure why we're talking about some weird 1v1 in the first place. Fact is, in the game of hockey, Matthews is unquestionably the better player. Literally the only thing that Mackinnon has on him is speed, and there's a heck of a lot more to hockey than that.
Not sure what any of these made-up stories have to do with anything.I should not get into hockey skill matters with people who have never laced em up at elite level .. but you did give me a great LOL with your description .. fact is there would not be a damn thing Matty could do except watch MAC skate with puck .. you can't use any of his skills when you can't get a puck .. it would literally be a complete skate around and shot and then race for a puck and then another shot and then another race for a puck and another shot .. and it does happen a lot in tournaments .. in fact at beanpot i was on bench when Mitch and Matty had a go after 5 sets of OT with a Toronto team and Boston Jr Bruins (which was a US all star team) .. fact was Mitch never even touched da puck once .. it took Matty 3 shots to finally score and win game for Boston .. speed wise no comparison between Matty and Mitch and guess what Mitch did not get a puck .. speed and will/strength decide these type of battles .. it is why for many many many years when I was growing up these skilled US teams never won a damn thing ever even though they looked brilliant in da warmup .. but over time many Canadians have moved down south to build USA hockey and their kids have brought more of warrior culture to many USA programs
It is how the successful world works. When Dubas wins something, then and only then can he set a standard. 55 yrs and counting. When you learn something about professional bargaining, you will see the errors of your way.Maybe Marner deserved $10.6M and Dubas' did his job by getting him for $10.5M.
Your "logic" is not how the world works. If Dubas' had saved a dollar here and a dollar there a few years ago...he would have spent a dollar here and a dollar there over the next few years. It's a transparent system, agents know how much money you have...maybe Bunting asks for an extra $100K, maybe Kampf does, or Giordano or Rielly don't take the exact discount they did...I don't think everyone signs for what they did because Dubas tells them he will need a few extra hundred K to get Robertson in the opening roster in a few years.
Also, the Athletic just declared this the best roster in NHL this year. Where does Robertson play opening night exactly?
When we need a goaltender in Feb, the need for that $500,000 will be important. That is how you manage and bargain. Anyone can spend to the max.It’s naive to think if they save a few dollars on one player it wouldn’t be spent on another.
The team is what’s important, not Robertson.
Remember this in Feb when 4 should be 400,000The $4 situation was perfect. How much closer could they realistically get?
You think they will be trying to maximize LTIR in February?Remember this in Feb when 4 should be 400,000
Yes. That was my point.Getting rid of Aube Kubel to make room for Robertson doesn’t make much sense. NAK is better on the 4th line than Robertson or Malgin. I’d rather have Robertson or Malgin higher up in the lineup but that isn’t the spot you would have opened up.
And even if you did go that route it wouldn’t clear enough room to bring Liljegren back of waivers.
So in your scenario you lose an asset in Kubel and still have to make a trade in 3 weeks anyway and have lost depth beforehand.
Remember this in Feb when 4 should be 400,000