Sypher04
Registered User
- Jan 20, 2011
- 12,747
- 11,581
I'm not sure I agree with this premise. If you play cute hockey, and that's your game, we shouldn't fit round pegs into square holes. If they can be effective doing that... let them be. If Robertson is on your third line... he's not likely crashing the net, or finishing every check, nor should he be. He's a skilled kid, let him play his game.
You should however be responsible in your hockey, manage pucks well, and be defensively aware... at least score more goals as a group on the ice, than we have scored against us.
I agree we need some of that crashing the net, finishing checks on every line though... that even includes the top two lines... there should be some of that throughout the lineup really.
There is wiggle room here imo particularly when dealing with young players finding their roles in the NHL. If Robertson is on the path to being a top 6 player then sure this makes sense, if it becomes clear he’s not going to cut it as a top 6 then at that point I think he needs to cultivate the parts of his game that make him an effective bottom 6 player.
Or at least that’s how I see it.
Definitely not looking to fit square pegs into round holes but I think generally speaking a depth player that won’t do these things can often be replaced with one that will.