Marner and Kampf for Kreider and Trouba is pretty close....cap wise
include Timmins and maybe Rangers give a conditional pick
include Timmins and maybe Rangers give a conditional pick
Trades & Free Agency Thread: 2024-2025 Season Edition
- Thread starter SprDaVE
- Start date
1specter
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2016
- 12,321
- 18,592
Trouba is dogshit and not the guy you think he is. He doesn't even produce offense anymore.
SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 54,838
- 39,125
Nashville and Pittsburgh are definitely 2 teams that are fits for a trade with the Leafs.
Kreider's stat-line is wild this year: Not a single assist through 19GP, but scoring at a near-40G pace. He'd still be a great add, but this sounds like an on-the-fly retool, not a rebuild for the Rangers. I imagine they're thinking hockey trade and trading off our D core to fix our C depth is just filing one hole while creating another.
Namikaze Minato
Registered User
For f*** sakes, we all would have paid more than a fourth round pick.
SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 54,838
- 39,125
Yeah that's a weird one for the Preds. They also lost Fabbro on waivers, who has been excellent for the Blue Jackets. So not a great month for the Preds. Tomasino is overrated but he would have been a solid RW option for the Leafs. This also means we sort of know where Robertson's value is.
But maybe this opens up a trade for O'Connor for the Leafs.
Torontonian
Registered User
Don't think Toronto should be or is in the market for the unknown. Tomasino 100% can't be your 3rd line center as a contending team, and Toronto has more then enough depth/fringe wingers.
Just getting a 3C allows Toronto to look deeper upfront on multiple lines. At this point, a winger for Toronto is a luxury piece, not a need.
SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 54,838
- 39,125
I am also in the market for any fringe C, better than fringe wingers of which we have too many.
Tomasino was probably worth the gamble, but I think Pred fans have the opinion he cannot play C?
Tomasino was probably worth the gamble, but I think Pred fans have the opinion he cannot play C?
leafsfan2point0
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2011
- 1,999
- 2,376
tmlfan98
No More Excuses #MarnerOut
The way you worded this post I thought it was a trade that actually happened lol.
There's no point in selling low on Robertson while his value is this low.
Robertson's value is way above his current points.
He's drawn a million penalties (he leads the team) and a million posts. They are going to start going in soon.
Robertson's value is way above his current points.
He's drawn a million penalties (he leads the team) and a million posts. They are going to start going in soon.
I am Canadian
AM34|WN88|MM16
I see no reason to deal Robertson. They wouldn't likely wouldn't get more than a 4th for him as we just saw with Tomasino. He's still contributing value minutes for the Leafs, even if he's been very snakebitten.
If they eventually lose him to waivers so be it.
If they eventually lose him to waivers so be it.
leafsfan2point0
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2011
- 1,999
- 2,376
Ideal pre-deadline:
Granlund (50% retained by Blue Jackets) for Robertson + 26 1st + 25 4th (to BJs)
Holmberg + 25 3rd + B/C prospect for B Tanev 50%
Knies - Matthews - Domi
McMann - Tavares - Marner
Tanev - Granlund - Nylander
Lorentz - Kampf - Dewar/Reaves
Pacioretty bumps Tanev down if/when he comes back.
Granlund (50% retained by Blue Jackets) for Robertson + 26 1st + 25 4th (to BJs)
Holmberg + 25 3rd + B/C prospect for B Tanev 50%
Knies - Matthews - Domi
McMann - Tavares - Marner
Tanev - Granlund - Nylander
Lorentz - Kampf - Dewar/Reaves
Pacioretty bumps Tanev down if/when he comes back.
