Trades & Free Agency Thread: 2024-2025 Season Edition

horner

Registered User
May 22, 2007
8,480
4,875
It’s crazy that they let McCann go for nothing
Dubas had many opportunities to grab a center and let them go or didn't trade for them the same with dman.

McCann kept Holl and kerfoot instead

Sam Bennett always showed up in the playoffs

Nick Paul

Toews

But because dubie always went all in at the deadline we never had the assets
 

TMLAM34

Registered User
Oct 15, 2020
5,247
6,207
Dubas had many opportunities to grab a center and let them go or didn't trade for them the same with dman.

McCann kept Holl and kerfoot instead

Sam Bennett always showed up in the playoffs

Nick Paul

Toews

But because dubie always went all in at the deadline we never had the assets
McCann isn’t a center, but he would have definitely solidified our left side. Imagine having McCann - Knies - McMann - Lorentz lines 1 to 4. Dubas royally f***ed that one up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafSteel

Machinae

Registered User
Jul 6, 2007
1,988
604
Mississauga, ON
Dubas had many opportunities to grab a center and let them go or didn't trade for them the same with dman.

McCann kept Holl and kerfoot instead

Sam Bennett always showed up in the playoffs

Nick Paul

Toews

But because dubie always went all in at the deadline we never had the assets

It was a mistake in hindsight for sure, but at least get the context right.

Kerfoot was not kept over McCann. They went 4F / 4D / 1G instead of 7F / 3D / 1G.

Holl was kept as the 4th D and they moved a prospect and a 7th round pick to Pittsburgh (the ultimate losers in all of this) for McCann so that they could expose both Kerfoot and McCann and guarantee they kept one of them.

Yes, Holl was not worth keeping in the end. If not for the McCann move, they would have lost Kerfoot instead. If they kept Kerfoot/McCann + another forward, they would have lost Holl and had a gaping hole at RD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,493
14,990
Pickering, Ontario
It was a mistake in hindsight for sure, but at least get the context right.

Kerfoot was not kept over McCann. They went 4F / 4D / 1G instead of 7F / 3D / 1G.

Holl was kept as the 4th D and they moved a prospect and a 7th round pick to Pittsburgh (the ultimate losers in all of this) for McCann so that they could expose both Kerfoot and McCann and guarantee they kept one of them.

Yes, Holl was not worth keeping in the end. If not for the McCann move, they would have lost Kerfoot instead. If they kept Kerfoot/McCann + another forward, they would have lost Holl and had a gaping hole at RD.
There was no gaping hole at RHD

This is a dumb narrative dubas fans were trying to create then

In 2021 we had Lilijgren who was supposed to be NHL ready amd a quick transition to top 4RHD. He had been cooked for 4 years in the AHL and a few NHL games at that point.

Holding Holl made no sense unless we didnt believe in Lilijgren and thought he wasnt able to be more than 5-7D for the next two years.

It was terrible asset management for a guy who already showed he struggles away from Muzzin.

Dubas needed to trade Holl for a few picks and then leave Kerfoot exposed and sign/acquire a D to be able to be picked up in the expansion draft.

If we went 7-3-1 it should have been

Matthews
Marner
NYlander
Tavares
McCann
Forward 6 (Spezza)
Forward 7 (kerfoot)

Rielly
Muzzin
Brodie
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jmo89

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
86,875
18,560
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
Which isn’t the coach’s job.

Yep.

Seems Berube never liked him from the beginning.

No coach nor GM is perfect.

From the condensed game yesterday (was tied up in something last night couldn't watch), it doesn't look like the current Leafs defense is all the good anyway, with or without Liljegren. Again, only watched the condensed target practice the Bruins held in the Leafs zone, so it was just limited highlights of being overwhelmed in the Leafs zone.
 

Machinae

Registered User
Jul 6, 2007
1,988
604
Mississauga, ON
There was no gaping hole at RHD

This is a dumb narrative dubas fans were trying to create then

In 2021 we had Lilijgren who was supposed to be NHL ready amd a quick transition to top 4RHD. He had been cooked for 4 years in the AHL and a few NHL games at that point.

Holding Holl made no sense unless we didnt believe in Lilijgren and thought he wasnt able to be more than 5-7D for the next two years.

It was terrible asset management for a guy who already showed he struggles away from Muzzin.

Dubas needed to trade Holl for a few picks and then leave Kerfoot exposed and sign/acquire a D to be able to be picked up in the expansion draft.

If we went 7-3-1 it should have been

Matthews
Marner
NYlander
Tavares
McCann
Forward 6 (Spezza)
Forward 7 (kerfoot)

Rielly
Muzzin
Brodie

Liljegren? The guy they are trying to give away right now and won't even play over Philippe Myers? He was the answer?

Thinking they didn't have a gaping hole at RD is unbelievably stupid. You're biased against the guy because Holl flopped and McCann went on to elevate his role in Seattle, but don't think for one second right handed dmen didn't have value. They are hard to find and/or replace. McCann was traded for a THROW IN prospect and a 7th round pick. 30 teams in the league did not beat that offer or value McCann higher than their 7th best forward / 4th best d-man. Pittsburgh gave him away for nothing and lost Brandon Tanev on top of it, which was a monumentally stupid decision, much more so than Toronto. Give up your pathetic narrative and move on.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad