Trades & Free Agency Thread: 2024-2025 Season Edition

SprDaVE

Moderator
Sep 20, 2008
53,969
37,289
Too bad you can't teach faceoffs. A shame.
Is his production any better than Holmberg? Holmberg's 5v5 production with hard zone starts are pretty promising 2 games in.

Or, the other thing, I would simply demote Holmberg to 4C and look to trade Kampf.

I'd pick him up to play wing and maybe add another layer to the PK and bottom lines. He's more or less a more expensive Dewar though.

If Leafs want to trade Liljegren, maybe a swap makes sense but we are definitely heavy with forwards. Something like Liljegren and Abruzzese for Cates and maybe a depth defenseman might work?
 
Last edited:

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
86,671
18,288
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
Is his production any better than Holmberg? Holmberg's 5v5 production with hard zone starts are pretty promising 2 games in.

Or, the other thing, I would simply demote Holmberg to 4C and look to trade Kampf.

If he is horrible on face-offs why not use him as a winger?

So far this year, Holmberg is ...

1728670922114.png
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
33,974
12,069
I'd pick him up to play wing and maybe add another layer to the PK and bottom lines. He's more or less a more expensive Dewar though.

If Leafs want to trade Liljegren, maybe a swap makes sense but we are definitely heavy with forwards. Something like Liljegren and Abruzzese for Cates and maybe a depth defenseman might work?

If he is horrible on face-offs why not use him as a winger?

So far this year, Holmberg is ...

View attachment 915263

I'd almost rather a 2nd or 3rd+4th for Liljegren because it's currency for later this year if a better/more interesting name came up.

Face offs can take a while, the previous 2 years, Holmberg wasn't even 50% on face offs, he was bad, you can get better at them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SprDaVE and ULF_55

SprDaVE

Moderator
Sep 20, 2008
53,969
37,289
I'd almost rather a 2nd or 3rd+4th for Liljegren because it's currency for later this year if a better/more interesting name came up.

Face offs can take a while, the previous 2 years, Holmberg wasn't even 50% on face offs, he was bad, you can get better at them.

Maybe. Grabbing another versatile player that fits the mid lines and is only 25 could be worth it, especially if they still plan on dumping Jarnkrok or Robertson.

I don't think the Leafs want another expensive depth forward though even if he looks like an interesting pick up.
 

pspot

Registered User
Dec 20, 2004
10,307
545
Kitchener
Domi was great on face offs last year , don’t know why they aren’t trying that more , have two of domi , jt or nylander as your middle six C
 

jiggy35

Registered User
Jun 26, 2012
639
370
Jarnkrok + Liljegren for Murphy if we’ve really given up on Lilly.

Kampf to highest bidder once Dewar is ready.
 
Last edited:

Rare Jewel

Patience
Jan 11, 2007
20,089
4,187
Leaf Land
Kampf to highest bidder once Dewar is ready.
While moving him would create cap space, it puts further question marks over the center spot. And to be fair to Kampf, I thought he was the best center last night.

Jarnkrok, while useful himself, is a winger and may even yield a better return due to cap hit and term.

Moving Kampf may be a thing, but they need to add another C first IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jmo89

meefer

Registered User
Jun 9, 2015
4,798
4,809
Bangkok
Say what you want about Liljegren, I think Berube is showcasing Timmins, who I think has value if he can remain healthy (and we won’t know about that unless he’s played), while trying to replace the ‘fear’ Lily developed by being coached by Keefe. It may be Keefes biggest failing with respect to player development. TL’s first year when In the show - I remember a kid who improved every game from Nov - March, and after a couple of weak games Keefe pulled him. It never reconnected for TL, and imo, Keefe’s fault. Even last year when he played well when Rielly was down, there was no rope. I have no idea if correct, but if Lily gets angry enough at Berube, and ditches the fear of mistakes, he’ll return to the type of defenceman we have seen and saw promise from. Where it goes from there is anyone’s guess.
 

Jmo89

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
4,539
4,162
While moving him would create cap space, it puts further question marks over the center spot. And to be fair to Kampf, I thought he was the best center last night.

Jarnkrok, while useful himself, is a winger and may even yield a better return due to cap hit and term.

Moving Kampf may be a thing, but they need to add another C first IMO.

The 4th line looked great (obviously, they had two goals.) If that's the 4th line going forward I'm fine with them keeping Kampf. I don't mind Reaves drawing in here and there but I hope he's not a regular. He's fine as an extra forward.

Jarnkrok is the one to unload from the forward group.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad