Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 24,211
- 29,249
would be dumb if he was locked up for a few years...but he is a rental in a trade, and possibly an "own rental" if they keep him. Grabbing a goalie and opening the cap space provides tons of options....just depends how they get used.Trading a talent like Marner for a Goalie will go down as one of the all time Leaf dumb moves.
But if that's the direction they are going in, why do they want an $11+ million guy who will be in his 30s by the time those young players are in their prime?They've got a ton of young kids who will likely be competing for spots this year. In addition to the ones mentioned above, Kemmel, Svechkov, L'Heureux, Afanasyev could all be competing for forward spots. They have a ton of prospects.
So we have a mixture of vets and young players and not end up like Buffalo or Edmonton.But if that's the direction they are going in, why do they want an $11+ million guy who will be in his 30s by the time those young players are in their prime?
Nashville already has that without having to add another $11 million in salary - Forsberg/ROR/Nyquist/Josi/Saros, etc.So we have a mixture of vets and young players and not end up like Buffalo or Edmonton.
Florida and New York defense may not have size, but you would be stupid to think that the D-core's isn't a physical group. They are extremely physical and both teams play big
Dallas is the only team in there, that you can make a case is fairly soft and not interested in size/toughness.
The last player the Leafs should target. One of the softest forwards in the league.I don't love going down the Nashville route, but if we do we need to get Tommy Novak back in the trade
We need to add another star forward, is that guy Marner? We don't know, but I suspect we'll be making a splash.Nashville already has that without having to add another $11 million in salary - Forsberg/ROR/Nyquist/Josi/Saros, etc.
Nashville isn't even considering moving Josi. He's a future HHOF in his prime. You wouldn't be getting him for a Marner.It's the off-season so we can get a bit stupid right? Assuming Marner is willing to extend in Nashville...
View attachment 874037
Tkachuk returned a top pair RD, a top line winger and a 1st
Marner = Josi
Saros for Rielly
2nd for Liljegren, Jarnkrok, 5th and 7th
I feel like on value that's pretty sweet for Nashville, Leafs get a different look for PP QB and in net
Preds get a top scoring type RW to draw more hype, Forsberg-ROR-Marner would be one of the better 2-way lines in the league.
Rielly replaces some of the offense lost with Josi. Liljegren is a young RD for a change of scenery and Jarnkrok is a utility forward they're familiar with, plus some extra picks.
Will it happen? Nah.
The assumption of him being traded is with an extension, a goalie is a terrible return for an elite player that’s signed. The cap space opens regardless.would be dumb if he was locked up for a few years...but he is a rental in a trade, and possibly an "own rental" if they keep him. Grabbing a goalie and opening the cap space provides tons of options....just depends how they get used.
Said it before and will say it again:
If Marner is being traded, Treliving has to hit it out of the park, both on the trade return and what he does with the freed up cap space.
Nashville and Saros are meh from my view.
We have Woll and Hildeby, as well as 2 other goalie prospects chomping at the bit for a chance.
Marner is a premium trade chip. Saros would be a waste and I wouldn’t want to think what Saros would be demanding as a UFA next season.
Hard pass on a deal with Nashville.
Find something better. Mangling a Marner trade can screw us over easily for the next 5 years.
what did Trots say about Marner, I couldn't make out what he said?
LMAO. Can't believe this was actually asked, I honestly thought it was AI at first
If Trotz is seriously interested, Marner + Lily for Askarov, Fabrro, Tomasino and a 1st. That leaves you plenty of cap space to sign Lindholm or a top dmam.Said it before and will say it again:
If Marner is being traded, Treliving has to hit it out of the park, both on the trade return and what he does with the freed up cap space.
Nashville and Saros are meh from my view.
We have Woll and Hildeby, as well as 2 other goalie prospects chomping at the bit for a chance.
Marner is a premium trade chip. Saros would be a waste and I wouldn’t want to think what Saros would be demanding as a UFA next season.
Hard pass on a deal with Nashville.
Find something better. Mangling a Marner trade can screw us over easily for the next 5 years.
That offer covers a lot of ground. It's a solid framework of what I'd hope for. Though if you could get a more established player as the centrepiece, and change that 1st to a 2nd, I'd be thrilledIf Trotz is seriously interested, Marner + Lily for Askarov, Fabrro, Tomasino and a 1st. That leaves you plenty of cap space to sign Lindholm or a top dmam.
Agreed but if Askarov is another Sirokin/Shesterkin, we would be set in goal for the next decade. Risky but the reward could be huge.That offer covers a lot of ground. It's a solid framework of what I'd hope for. Though if you could get a more established player as the centrepiece, and change that 1st to a 2nd, I'd be thrilled
I'm so tired of not having a goalie, so I want it to be trueAgreed but if Askarov is another Sirokin/Shesterkin, we would be set in goal for the next decade. Risky but the reward could be huge.
Said it before and will say it again:
If Marner is being traded, Treliving has to hit it out of the park, both on the trade return and what he does with the freed up cap space.
Nashville and Saros are meh from my view.
We have Woll and Hildeby, as well as 2 other goalie prospects chomping at the bit for a chance.
Marner is a premium trade chip. Saros would be a waste and I wouldn’t want to think what Saros would be demanding as a UFA next season.
Hard pass on a deal with Nashville.
Find something better. Mangling a Marner trade can screw us over easily for the next 5 years.