Kurtz
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2005
- 10,518
- 7,744
Sharks just added two bottom-6 guys, which I think makes their interest in additional bottom 6 guys less likely.If they’re looking for intangibles Tree needs to sell Grier on Kampf.
Sharks just added two bottom-6 guys, which I think makes their interest in additional bottom 6 guys less likely.If they’re looking for intangibles Tree needs to sell Grier on Kampf.
Maybe he would have interest in Jarnkrok insteadSharks just added two bottom-6 guys, which I think makes their interest in additional bottom 6 guys less likely.
It looks like they could use 1-2 solid vets, ideally decent defensively, to insulate and support the high skill kids in the top 9. Jarncrok could be a fit, but I think they should aim higherMaybe he would have interest in Jarnkrok instead
Would you have done a 1st round pick + Lily for Markstrom?
I'd pass on that.Would you have done a 1st round pick + Lily for Markstrom?
Maybe if he wasn't going to be 35 years old, 1/2 way through the season. Maybe if he was 10 years younger...Would you have done a 1st round pick + Lily for Markstrom?
""
""
Crazy trade.
They got lucky they could dump that contract.What a disaster for LA. Gave up on PLD after only a season.
What a disaster for LA. Gave up on PLD after only a season.
They were better off just trading that package for Hellebuyck from the start lol.Works out to Vilardi + Iafallo + Kupari + 2nd for 1 year of Dubois at 8.5M followed by 3 years of Kuemper at 5.25M (but playing as a ~1M-2.5M goalie the last two years).
What a disaster for LA. Gave up on PLD after only a season.
Have to assume Ullmark is destined for Ottawa nextTwo teams no longer in the market for a #1G.
Two teams no longer in the market for a #1G.