I wouldn't be opposed to Muzzin or Lindholm pattern deal, but I disagree wholeheartedly with the second bold, and the first bold is inconsistent with arguing against a RH McCabe. It all comes down to how we construct the D. Rielly needs the right partner to give us that minute munching playoff d pair- but that partner doesn't have to be another 7+ million dollar top pairingd. I'm not sold on renting Tanev or Savard as a good use of assets, and Peeke is definitely a gamble, but the right complementary guy to Mo- even if its more of a 4-5 type- with multiple years of control provides stability and consistency in the top pair, stops the merry go round, and absolutely moves the needle.
Another top pairing guy moves the needle also, but in a different way. It would allow us to have two "top pair" quality pairings- if we have the right partners for both Rielly and dmanX. Do we have that in house?