Yeah it all comes down to if a team is willing to potentially take the expansion hit for getting Ekholm. Nashville should keep the option open in case someone does decide to pony up imoIf they get the value they want, they'll probably trade him. Expansion draft really confuses the value though.
Sure you get another season, but then you also are likely to lose a better player in expansion. The Leafs, for example, would likely lose Holl if they acquired Ekholm.
you can't be serious?
Just looked it up. 110 players have played 45 or more minutes on the PK. Here is where Kerfoot ranks.you can't be serious?
Kerfoot might be the most average NHL player I've ever seen. And a prime example why you don't pay those guys more then 2m in this cap range. It's not that he's severely overpayed at 3.75, it's that you could luck out on a 1m guy off the scrapheap giving you basically the same thing
Yes, I agree with that. What's your source for those?Just looked it up. 110 players have played 45 or more minutes on the PK. Here is where Kerfoot ranks.
CA/60: 8th
SCA/60: 36th
HDCA/60: 39th
xGA/60: 21st
So one of the better ones is a stretch, but he has been excellent.
He seems pretty average at everything. If you think that makes him an all-round player, sure, I guess that's the case.
Factoids = faceoffs?He is egregiously poor at factoids and that’s kind of important for a “PK specialist” and 3rd line C. Right now, you cannot rely on him at all for a draw and you gotta bring in Spez to take pk draws then book it to the bench because he’s too old and slow to be a PKer
Out of forwards who play 50+ minutes on the PK (100 players exactly):
8th in xGA/60
5th in CA/60
9th in FA/60
13th in SA/60
21st in SCA/60
25th in HDCA/60
22nd in HDGA/60
74th in GA/60
95th in on-ice save percentage. Mikheyev is 52nd; Marner is 84th, Hyman is 81st.
So unless you are blaming Kerfoot for Andersen being inept on the PK (he has 18 GA on a 9.24 xGA this season while Hutch and Campbell have given up 4 on a combined 5.4 xGA), when all of our other forwards are suffering from the exactly same effect, then he is up there in the league right now.
Source: naturalstattrick.com
EDIT: I realized Sticky probably referenced the same thing. I used 50 minutes instead of 45 though.
Pretty much he provides solid 3rd line production, is solid in his own end, can PK, can play up and down the lineup.
He's very vanilla, but the kind of vanilla you want as a depth guy on your team.
If Vancouver pays the right price (I would want at least their 2021 2nd) and the Leafs get the right guy to replace him, then go ahead. I find it hard to believe all of that is going to come together properly though.
Thanks for the reference, pretty impressive site; one thing though this set of 9 stats do not tell the whole story (tells quite a bit though, but obviously even a full analysis of every statistic would tell more but not everything). For instance you'd expect the 2nd pk unit (those who do not start penalty kills) to have easier matchups because: 1) They more often than not face a secondary powerplay unit; and/or 2) when facing the first unit, those players are more fatigued resulting in decreased on ice efficiency directly correlated to their stats.Out of forwards who play 50+ minutes on the PK (100 players exactly):
8th in xGA/60
5th in CA/60
9th in FA/60
13th in SA/60
21st in SCA/60
25th in HDCA/60
22nd in HDGA/60
74th in GA/60
95th in on-ice save percentage. Mikheyev is 52nd; Marner is 84th, Hyman is 81st.
So unless you are blaming Kerfoot for Andersen being inept on the PK (he has 18 GA on a 9.24 xGA this season while Hutch and Campbell have given up 4 on a combined 5.4 xGA), when all of our other forwards are suffering from the exactly same effect, then he is up there in the league right now.
Source: naturalstattrick.com
EDIT: I realized Sticky probably referenced the same thing. I used 50 minutes instead of 45 though.
Natural stat trick. I would be fine with upgrading Kerfoot but he is better then he gets credit for.Yes, I agree with that. What's your source for those?
hahaha damn autocorrect. But, yeah.Factoids = faceoffs?
Great point. Considering we're sitting in 20th at 77%, and closer to 31st than 1st, I'd say that's not very likely.Advanced stats seem to group Kerfoot, Marner, Hyman and Mickey quite closely together in this. So either we have 4 of the best penalty killing forwards in the league on our team, or there is a multicollinearity effect that biases the numbers some.
Pretty much he provides solid 3rd line production, is solid in his own end, can PK, can play up and down the lineup.
He's very vanilla, but the kind of vanilla you want as a depth guy on your team.
If Vancouver pays the right price (I would want at least their 2021 2nd) and the Leafs get the right guy to replace him, then go ahead. I find it hard to believe all of that is going to come together properly though.
I agree you want that player. You can’t have him at a 3.5 million dollar cap hit.
Ah ya, he's been terrible in the faceoff circle this year. His career is near 50% though, I'd tend to trust the larger sample for something so repetitive...like flipping a coin 10 times in a row could be all heads, but flipping it 10 million times is going to net very near 50/50. So I think he'll right that ship.hahaha damn autocorrect. But, yeah.
Kerfoot generally doesn't start the PK with a defensive zone draw. You can't compare guys like that to 1st unit PK'ers. Having to win the faceoff and clear the zone is significantly more difficult than coming off the bench fresh against a potentially tired PP unit.