Although Terry has looked good with Zegras and still fits their group from an age perspective, so I feel like he could stay there. Plus I don't know if he's what the Leafs need for a playoff push.So NJD and LAK are trying to extend Palmieri and Iafallo.
CBJ supposedly isn’t ready to sell (Foligno).
I really think something might come together with ANA. Hakanpaa would be a solid depth D add. Rakell or Terry (or both) would be great additions to our lineup.
Although Terry has looked good with Zegras and still fits their group from an age perspective, so I feel like he could stay there. Plus I don't know if he's what the Leafs need for a playoff push.
It's so, so important to hold onto guys like Robertson, Sandin, and even Liljegren with our current cap makeup.
Amirov you can argue is a few years away and not really a necessity (more the cherry on top) so he could be traded for someone who can put us over the top. 1st/2nd round picks as well as Kerfoot too, of course.
A couple of thoughts. I wonder if a team drops out of the North Division playoff race closer to the deadline we could see a Leafs and another Canadian team making a deal closer to the deadline, foregoing the quarantine procedures.
?
It's so, so important to hold onto guys like Robertson, Sandin, even Liljegren with our current cap makeup.
Amirov is a few years away and not really a necessity (more the cherry on top) so he could be traded for someone who can put us over the top. Also on the block should be 1st/2nd round picks and Kerfoot (too much $) as well.
@Stephen I can see why it makes sense to move Amirov/Kerfoot.
It is very important. I don't think anyone is rushing to give them up for rentals or bad players. But it's also not very realistic to hold on to all of them when we have you have a chance to immediately improve your roster and give yourself the best chance at winning the cup.
The thing about moving Kerfoot is you are losing an important top 9 player for 2 weeks without an immediate replacement if you move him, and I don't think they want to move a guy with his kind of flexibility unless absolutely necessary. At least with a guy like Andersen, you have Campbell who can take the reins for the most part and you may only need to play Hutch one or two times barring injury, and for Engvall he is not quite as good as Kerfoot so he is easier to replace with a different guy.
Absolutely none of Robertson, Liljegren, Sandin or Amirov should be even discussed for a rental.
Ottawa received Brannstrom, a 2nd round pick and a contract dump for Mark Stone (with a long term extension!). The cost of a rental should not include any of the guys listed above. Not even close, really.
Absolutely none of Robertson, Liljegren, Sandin or Amirov should be even discussed for a rental.
Ottawa received Brannstrom, a 2nd round pick and a contract dump for Mark Stone (with a long term extension!). The cost of a rental should not include any of the guys listed above. Not even close, really.
Yup. He was a really good prospect. Fair to say he'd be on par at that time with Liljegren/Sandin level of prospect.I’m not really in favour of trading any of those guys for a pure rental either, but to be fair wasn’t Brannstrom one of the best D prospects out there at the time of the trade?
Mark Stone came with a hand-shake extension. Brannstrom's value was very high. Equivalent to what Sandin/Liljegren's value is now.I think you under value Brannstroms value at the time. Him and a 2nd for a rental was a high price to pay, even if Brannstrom hasn't panned out (yet). His value at the time was pretty much Sandins value right now. I think that says a lot about top prospects sometimes not working out as well.
I doubt Dubas does this kind of move though for a rental. I do think he'd trade one of the top prospects for a Rackell or a Forsberg if they are retained.
Yup. He was a really good prospect. Fair to say he'd be on par at that time with Liljegren/Sandin level of prospect.
Stone came with an extension though. Point being, none of our guys will be traded for a rental.
Mark Stone came with a hand-shake extension. Brannstrom's value was very high. Equivalent to what Sandin/Liljegren's value is now.
I'm not undervaluing Brannstrom at all. I'm suggesting that if you give up a player of his value, it's not for a rental. It's for a player with term.