Trades and Free Agency - 2022 Off-season

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Marleau was significantly better than Monahan is now, and we gave up an unconditional 1st

Patrick Marleau was traded to the Carolina Hurricanes along with a conditional first-round pick and a seventh-round pick in the 2020 NHL Draft by the Toronto Maple Leafs for a sixth-round pick in 2020 on Saturday.

If Toronto's first-round selection in the 2020 draft is a top-10 pick, the Hurricanes will instead receive the Maple Leafs' first-round pick in the 2021 NHL Draft.

from NHL,com first was conditional, and we gave up a 7th and got a 6th.
 
Yes, precedents tend to be a longer time ago. Lou set the precedent, on a better contract.

That's not true. A 1st has been involved in multiple cap dumps throughout the cap era. And Marleau was also one of the worst things to ever be dumped.

We don't know what Eriksson's actual cost was on it's own, because he was involved in a much bigger trade (which actually did include a 1st).
Ladd was dumped for two 2nds and a 3rd, so not really better than a 1st.

Neither were as bad, neither had NMCs, and the fact that they continued to play is kind of the point. They were overpaid, and potentially LTIR, but they weren't just dead cap and money, much less for a competitive team.
What was Malakhov's contract? I can't find any info on that. Can you please also share which cap dumps were accompanied by a first with nothing else involved? Implying that the Eriksson deal was similar to the Marleau deal is quite disingenuous. Calling two 2nd and a 3rd = 1st isn't a stretch but the first 2nd round pick was known to be 60th OA at the time which makes it difficult to equate it to a 1st - even then, Ladd had 2 years remaining.

Ladd and Eriksson were both worse than Marleau at the time. Ladd was coming off two seasons in the AHL and Arizona took on 2 years at 5.5M. Eriksson played 7 games the year prior to being dealt. They both played on the Coyotes this year but were equivalent to dead money value wise. If you want to call Marleau's contract 5M in real money because you had to pay someone league minimum to fill a roster spot still it doesn't make the deal look any better compared to the two in question.

We're also just moving past the Backes deal which would have been the best case scenario.
 
Lou signed the Marleau contract, not Dubas . He was cleaning up his mess . The fact be would only waive for San Jose was also a factor.
If you can find one post on this board that claims Lou didn't sign Marleau then hats off to you. That poster must be uninformed. Marleau wanting to play for San Jose is absolutely a factor. The price was still more than any other team had given up to move out a contract in 13 years.
 
If you can find one post on this board that claims Lou didn't sign Marleau then hats off to you. That poster must be uninformed. Marleau wanting to play for San Jose is absolutely a factor. The price was still more than any other team had given up to move out a contract in 13 years.
When did the NHL institute a hard cap ? Legitimate question. I think that partly contributes to the time line as well ( obviously longer than 13 years but how long? ). Post strike ?
 
I disagree. This is the first summer since I signed up here over a decade ago where there aren't any/many anti-Leafers. Just a bunch of people who think the GM isn't good. Then a "vocal minority " , the new buzz term here, seems very offended with this anti-GM trend.

Even with zero evidence to support yourself, it is normal and common for any fan base to direct most blame to the GM in our current circumstances, so this off season has been uneventful for me. There's literally nothing unusual occurring.
I think people are missing part of the story.

The original post that referenced the Winter Soldier added "But opposite", meaning posters who blindly support anything 'Leafs', and there do seem to be a surfeit of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HolyCrap
When did the NHL institute a hard cap ? Legitimate question. I think that partly contributes to the time line as well ( obviously longer than 13 years but how long? ). Post strike ?
The first season was 2005-06. The Devils (Lou) moved out Malakhov and a 1st round pick in the summer of 2006 for two players who were non-factors.
 
That contract wasnt signed while there was a salary cap?
I struggled to find full details on it but according to wiki it was signed in August 2005 when the salary cap was known but no cap season had been played. Coincidentally the people who use this as an excuse for Dubas giving up a first will also use the Nash/Kovalchuk contracts signed during that same summer as comparables for Matthews.
 
I struggled to find full details on it but according to wiki it was signed in August 2005 when the salary cap was known but no cap season had been played. Coincidentally the people who use this as an excuse for Dubas giving up a first will also use the Nash/Kovalchuk contracts signed during that same summer as comparables for Matthews.
Are there many similar deals to Marleau? With a 35+ full cap hit and $4m+ owed in real dollars being moved for buyout purposes? I can recall LTIR trades and inflated salaries, but I dont recall many moves strictly for buyout
 
Are there many similar deals to Marleau? With a 35+ full cap hit and $4m+ owed in real dollars being moved for buyout purposes? I can recall LTIR trades and inflated salaries, but I dont recall many moves strictly for buyout
None to my knowledge. The closest i could recall were Eriksson, Ladd, Backes. None were bought out but the team had to eat the cap hit and salary (not covered by insurance like an LTIR contract). In all 3 of those cases the players were no longer NHL caliber therefore the money is essentially dead.
 
Are there many similar deals to Marleau? With a 35+ full cap hit and $4m+ owed in real dollars being moved for buyout purposes? I can recall LTIR trades and inflated salaries, but I dont recall many moves strictly for buyout
Only thing ringing a bell is orpik to colorado
 
None to my knowledge. The closest i could recall were Eriksson, Ladd, Backes. None were bought out but the team had to eat the cap hit and salary (not covered by insurance like an LTIR contract). In all 3 of those cases the players were no longer NHL caliber therefore the money is essentially dead.
I cant find any exact comparables either. Backes and Loui were part of bigger deals, and Backes was in season. Really i dont see them as similar moves or situations.

Ladd isnt a bad comparison, similar total dollar cost to Marleau, but two years of a roster spot for the $5M theyre paying. Also feels like a pretty close cost to dump Ladd though.
 
Ladd isnt a bad comparison, similar total dollar cost to Marleau, but two years of a roster spot for the $5M theyre paying. Also feels like a pretty close cost to dump Ladd though.
Arizona’s paying 8M which is almost double the 4.25M Carolina paid Marleau. The cost is arguably the same although the first 2nd round pick was known to be 60th at the time which makes it less likely that that combination of picks would have equated a first.
 
Can we please get back to trade proposals and rumours instead of this constant bickering about dubas and Lou. You two should start your own thread about it so the rest of us can get on with the real thread,

What would be the most you would give up to get Patrick Kane with 50% retention

More than I'd like to admit. So i won't.

I will say however, that if it doesn't gut our strengths we have now, I think you try and pull the trigger.

That man would put us over the top, two legit first lines, the magic he could create on the powerplay? The experience of winning multiple cups? It would be a massive play by Dubas.

Considering he knows this is his make or break year, i would not be surprised with a swing for the fences type deal.

But all this only comes to fruition if the goaltending situation is solidified, if one of these dudes shows they got the stuff, boom we go, if it's mediocre we sit back.
 
Arizona’s paying 8M which is almost double the 4.25M Carolina paid Marleau. The cost is arguably the same although the first 2nd round pick was known to be 60th at the time which makes it less likely that that combination of picks would have equated a first.
Ladd's bonus would have been paid out on July 1/21, no? So that would take away $3M of that 8 which is where i came up woth the $5M number. Happy to be corrected if it is on a different payout due to covid or the odd Dec payout date like Marleau had.

Agreed on the pick expected values being similar at the times
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekes For Days
Only thing ringing a bell is orpik to colorado

Grubauer and orpik for a 2nd. Orpik was 5.5 cap hit.. 4.5 actual money

So wash paid .. im not even sure what they paid for the favor as a 2nd for grubauer looks decent in its own right
 
Grubauer and orpik for a 2nd. Orpik was 5.5 cap hit.. 4.5 actual money

So wash paid .. im not even sure what they paid for the favor as a 2nd for grubauer looks decent in its own right

He didn't have a 35+ contract and there were no bonuses in the last year. So they had a 2.5 mill cap hit one year and a 1.5 mill the other. 3 mill in real salary split over 2 years.

Grubauer probably costs something like 2 2nds at the time. A 2nd to take on and buy out Orpik seems right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekes For Days
He didn't have a 35+ contract and there were no bonuses in the last year. So they had a 2.5 mill cap hit one year and a 1.5 mill the other. 3 mill in real salary split over 2 years.

Grubauer probably costs something like 2 2nds at the time. A 2nd to take on and buy out Orpik seems right.
Right and marleau was i think 4.25 real money but the 6.25 cap hit for the year

So they got a goalie half or more as the favor.. got it...
 
Ladd's bonus would have been paid out on July 1/21, no? So that would take away $3M of that 8 which is where i came up woth the $5M number. Happy to be corrected if it is on a different payout due to covid or the odd Dec payout date like Marleau had.

Agreed on the pick expected values being similar at the times

A big part for these smaller market teams too is how much you have to pay up front. Marleau had to have most of his money paid out within 6 months... so less attractive team buying out or taking on a guy with no bonuses.

Ladd had more real money owed, but it can be split over 2 years and even if he takes one spot, that saves Arizona from having to pay someone else to take up that spot.
 
why take a chance on anyone not within the organization presently?
Isn't Dubas supposed to have restocked the team with plenty of talent? OH ... forgot that Lou had something to do with the leaf's present situation and Dubas was all alone in this battle of good versus evil lol.
Oh, and by the way .... Everyone is talking about Treviling from Calgary ... he sucks and so does his team. Big shit about little dick stuff. They still suck. only hope for this team is goaltending.

Play the f***ing kids!!!! Enough of providing the icepack for the older players to float away and die on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: geo25
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad