Dion TheFluff
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2015
- 4,185
- 3,712
i mean they have b2b cups and another cup finals appearance. I would happily mortgage the future for that
What's Waddell doing in Carolina? Must be feeling a bit of pressure seeing all these names drop off the board
Is Kerfoot playing like he did 2 years ago? He has 7 goals this year and took a brutal penalty that cost us late in the series last year. He could be punted to the moon for all I care.
Because tampa adding physicality doesn't mean leafs should add phisicality....I mean I want him to take Kerfoots spot. It isn't like Kerfoot is filling the net while also bringing zero physicality and we know he doesn't have it in when it gets tough. Also small samples. He played 8 games.
I think McMann is a better player then Kerfoot. Not just because he is more physical. Kerfoot is a better skater.Because tampa adding physicality doesn't mean leafs should add phisicality....
Trying to finish the serie with more hit than tampa its not whats gonna make leafs win. Kerfoot is better in every aspect of the game except physicality but sure removing a guy who can provide depht scoring, defensive abilitu for a guy who didn't provide anything from offensive et defensive side but whos hitting... come on
Lets put the worst player on the ice ans try to play like tampa
""
Sure, you pay all those picks for him, but he's only worth a $2mil contract?
Is this hockey, or WWE?Our bottom 6 inflicts no fear into opposition.
Only guys who will throw a hit are ZAR and Acciari.
Compare that to Tampa where every single guy in the bottom 6 hits and can fight
I think McMann is a better player then Kerfoot. Not just because he is more physical. Kerfoot is a better skater.
Unless we find a way to give away contracts, it doesn't look like we can be in on this action.
""
Sure, you pay all those picks for him, but he's only worth a $2mil contract?
I think McMann is a better player then Kerfoot. Not just because he is more physical. Kerfoot is a better skater.
This lessens the blow for Tampa; 2m long term is really good value for Jeannot, potentially really good. I'd be shocked if he actually signed for that low an AAV.
There's certainly worse deadline deals teams can make... even though it was a clear overpayment.
Getting Deslauriers for mid round pick would go a long way for our bottom 6.holy crap Tampa gave up a lot for Jeannot. mentioned earlier that Nic Deslauriers has been traded twice in recent years for a 3rd and a 4th round pick in separate deals. While Jeannot may have a little more scoring pop (he's not a 20% shooter) that is a horrendous deal and good on Nashville for moving him.
If Dubas gets Deslauriers or Mcbain for peanuts that offsets this move pretty easily.
Carreer earnings are extremly low though, he hasn't even made 2 million yet according to capfriendly.I’d be surprised if Jeannot takes a long term deal after a down season. A 1 year bridge would be more likely IMO
I’d be surprised if Jeannot takes a long term deal after a down season. A 1 year bridge would be more likely IMO
They probably made that trade knowing he'd probably take a long-term deal around that price.