slipknottin
Registered User
ROR at 20 was a 3rd year player and Stepan was a rookie.
So what? They were both 20 years old.
ROR at 20 was a 3rd year player and Stepan was a rookie.
You need to stop arguing in circles.
You honestly are making no points anymore.
ROR is a top two way center at age 20. Stepan is becoming a better two way center.
Ok, fair enough. He still had Brian Boyle production on a year that he didn't show up until the final half dozen games. Yes I realize Boyle was A LOT older, but my point is 26 points is not that great any way you slice it.
Ok, fair enough. He still had Brian Boyle production on a year that he didn't show up until the final half dozen games. Yes I realize Boyle was A LOT older, but my point is 26 points is not that great any way you slice it.
So what? They were both 20 years old.
Ok, but at age 21, he had 55 points. I see big improvement stats-wise. Why are you bringing up his offensive numbers when he was 19 and 20 years old? He put up the same amount of points as Boyle did last year, good for Boyle. Too bad that ROR was a teenager and playing against the opponent's top players every day.
However, I do find it alarming that he is trying to cash in after one good production year.
How do you know that the 55 points wasn't a fluke? I don't think he'll be a 26 point scorer but how do you know he's not really a 40-45 point scorer that had 1 nice 55 point year?
That makes no sense. 26 points for an 18 or 19 year old center who is already well above average defensively is pretty good. O'Reilly is on the same level as Callahan defensively.
Bringing Boyle into this argument makes no sense whatsoever. If you have ever seen O'Reilly play you wouldn't ever compare the 2.
How do you know that the 55 points wasn't a fluke? I don't think he'll be a 26 point scorer but how do you know he's not really a 40-45 point scorer that had 1 nice 55 point year?
Not sure how I'm arguing in circles. My point is that Stepan at 20 scored 45 points as a rookie, ROR as a 19 year old scored 26 points as a second year player. Someone brought up defense. Well Stepan wasn't a great defensive player a a rookie, why is that so terrible?
Callahan is a great shot blocker and penalty killer. I'm not sure he's a great defensive player. Either way, I'd love to have a 2 way center with scoring potential, just not for Del Zotto.
I would make a deal focused around ROR and MDZ. Ryan O'Reilly is a more talented Callahan. Anyone here that is familiar with my thoughts on the team knows how I feel about Callahan, so that is HIGH praise coming from me.
Not the biggest MDZ fan, but there is no doubt this is a heavy price to pay. Still, MDZ isn't going to get big minutes with McDonagh and Staal here. Staal is playing very well right now, and the Rangers probably value him not only as a player, but also as a locker room personality. Staal is a hard worker, he has handled a lot of work and pressure from almost the beginning of his career, and he seems to have a very even-keeled personality. McD will only continue to improve. He's a tremendous young player. I don't think either is going anywhere.
It means MDZ's value to the Rangers is diminished. Frankly, I think McD or Staal would have accumulated numbers approaching MDZ's last year if they had as many PP opportunities with the big guns as MDZ did.
No way the Avs are trading Johnson, and no way are they getting as much in return for ROR as the reports claim they want.
Callahan is a great shot blocker and penalty killer. I'm not sure he's a great defensive player. Either way, I'd love to have a 2 way center with scoring potential, just not for Del Zotto.
Really not comfortable with moving any of the top 4 defensemen.
McDonagh, Girardi, Staal, Stralman.
Stralman has been outstanding. And based on his play and production from prior years, there's nothing to indicate a drop off. He's been a solid player hi whole career.
McIlrath is very close.
Its a move that can be made without hurting the club.
Sting so you believe the Avs would add to O'Reilly considering the contract dispute and the other deals that have been made (Johnson from STL, Goligoski from Pitt)?
They would have to get a defenseman back but besides Johnson I don't see much....
They would have to get a defenseman back but besides Johnson I don't see much....
They would have to get a defenseman back but besides Johnson I don't see much....
Would the Rangers be willing to take on a prospect like that considering they are trying to win now?