HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #92: Waiting on the Draft edition

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
...anyone have thoughts on a trade for Barrett Hayton from Utah??... :dunno:

I touted Hayton to go to Habs in the KK draft. Saw him a ton in junior and liked him.

Expected more by this point but playing in ‘Zona couldn’t have been good.

He seems to be doing better in Utah and would be an OK 2C who I think would thrive in Habs’ hockey environs.

As someone posted in another thread, Sam Bennett (!!!) but Hayton wouldn’t cost as much/seems realistic.
 
On the other hand, the management is on record saying that this upcoming offseason is going to be very important, so it's not unreasonable to expect that they're going to pull every lever to pry that top 6 center. I wonder if we might see a player/prospect moved that will shock us.

Same. Gotta give to get. Other teams won’t give us their good centers for magic beans picks + Mailloux. I could see them exploring the trade value of Slaf or Guhle to get us a strong 1-2 punch down the middle. Especially Guhle with his injury history.

I wonder what kind of center we could get for a package built around either Slaf/Guhle, with adds-on like Beck/Kapanen/Mailloux/1 of our 2 1st.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think getting guys like Beniers or Johnston are realistic tbh. I feel like they’ll go for someone older like an O’Reilly or Schenn, hopefully I’m wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ozmodiar
I touted Hayton to go to Habs in the KK draft. Saw him a ton in junior and liked him.

Expected more by this point but playing in ‘Zona couldn’t have been good.

He seems to be doing better in Utah and would be an OK 2C who I think would thrive in Habs’ hockey environs.

As someone posted in another thread, Sam Bennett (!!!) but Hayton wouldn’t cost as much/seems realistic.
Not a bad target. Good stopgap that's young. He won't get in the way of players like Hage, but those players will also have a decent veteran to complete with for a roster spot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeliveauFan4ever
So our problem is managment drafting bad during a rebuild? Yikes, it hurts.
Drafting hasn't been bad under Hugo, IMO. Hutson, Reinbacher, Demidov, Fowler, Hage all look to be excellent picks. The jury is still out on whether Slaf was the best choice as a #1OA pick, but big guys take longer to develop.

No team hits on 100% of their draft picks, but around here anything less than that is considered a disaster by some posters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz
Drafting hasn't been bad under Hugo, IMO. Hutson, Reinbacher, Demidov, Fowler, Hage all look to be excellent picks. The jury is still out on whether Slaf was the best choice as a #1OA pick, but big guys take longer to develop.

No team hits on 100% of their draft picks, but around here anything less than that is considered a disaster by some posters.
Drafting, contract management and development are strengths of this new regime.
Inexperienced coaching, Identifying the right player and player evaluation need some improvement for sure (Dach, Newhook, Barron, Kovacevic, ...)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs
Why would he sign for only four years if it amounts to what he would get in 5 years elsewhere?

This will be his last big contract and he can sign for 7 guaranteed years elsewhere.
He will be 32, after a 4 year contract. He can still sign another contract.
 
It depends his risk aversion. He might be washed up by then from all the mileage on his body. Hypothetically scenario:
7 years at 8M = 56M
4 years at 9M + 4 years at 6M = 60M

Is the 4M more truly worth it? He could need to LTIR for all we know
at 8M$ for 7 years, off course not. The risk is too big.

But if he can only get 7M$ for 7 years and is disappointed with the long terms offers, it would be worth it to take a bigger salary for the short term.

What I like about the situation is Hughes will have a good inside track at Bennett's situation and expectations, him being a Quartexx client. He then can make an educated offer based on the situation.

The only thing I don't want is overpaying him to come here on a 7 years contract. Best case would be 3 or 4 years.
 
I don’t think getting guys like Beniers or Johnston are realistic tbh. I feel like they’ll go for someone older like an O’Reilly or Schenn, hopefully I’m wrong.
I dont know if that's a bad thing though, because they'll be stop gaps until Hage is ready imo
 
Drafting, contract management and development are strengths of this new regime.
Inexperienced coaching, Identifying the right player and player evaluation need some improvement for sure (Dach, Newhook, Barron, Kovacevic, ...)

Just say "no" to retroactive clairvoyance.

Dach was an excellent acquisition.

It didn't work out due to injuries and bad luck. Sometimes that happens.
 
Just say "no" to retroactive clairvoyance.

Dach was an excellent acquisition.

It didn't work out due to injuries and bad luck. Sometimes that happens.
I am not questioning injuries at all and I think he can still be valuable 3W, but we paid trade value for top6 C. Specifically, I am dissapointed by his inability to improve aspects of his game that would make him a better center.
Faceoff- how come he could not work on his blatant weakness. You can be injured and still work on your faceoffs.
Defensive play- they said he spent last year in coaching meetings and video room, but his defense was pathetic whole year.
 

Ad

Ad