HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #91: 2025 Trade Deadline edition

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
If a deal's there to be made around Dach+ for Cozens I'd do it, even if the plus is Calgary's first and a relatively decent prospect.

Both guys would likely benefit from a change of scenery, and not having Dach until next season probably wouldn't bother Buffalo since it'd just help them improve this years draft pick.

As far as his offensive upside goes, we know he almost hit 70 points in his 21 year old season. Even though he hasn't had a season that hot since, I'm sure he's going to be much more than a 40-50 point guy in his prime.

I feel like if we pass on him we're going to look back on it as a massive missed opportunity when the guy's in his prime. This season he's on pace for his best faceoff % yet at just over 50% and he's on pace for his most hits in a season by a significant margin(55 hits in 2022-23, 108 hits in 2023-24 and on pace for 200 hits this season), so he's doubled his hit totals for 2 consecutive seasons now. I don't think it's unrealistic to think he'll be a 60-70 point, big bodied, physical center in his prime that's reliable in the faceoff dot as well.
I would do it too. But it’s hard to believe Buffalo would do it. Cozens seems to get a lot of hate here but at least he’s heatlhy and had one real good season. Dach value right now is at a all time low. Just keep him and pray his carreer bounce back.
 
I always try to asked myself why the other team would accept an offer I want to make them. And I see no reason why a playoff team like LA and Flo would want Hage for their young proven talent.


Who sais that? Was pretty well know Laine was a cap dump, fine it worked for us. Guys like Robert Thomas/Quinton Byfield/etc are really not in the same position Laine was before we acquired him.
Was being sarcastic but go back in the rumor thread and you would see many stating that laine can’t be had cheap.if i have time tomorrow will pull a couple for comedy purposes :) ( then again not as some might feel I am singling them out) while I recognize we all , myself especially make statements that make us look silly ….
 
How much is Ristolainen Worth? Considering he make 5.1M$ for another season, might be a cheaper option for us since we could take the full cap hit.
The guy is big he hit hard, block shots, was a high pick he's still in is prime good skater with some skills and if he doesn't have to play 20min per night or playing with a better partner he might even be more effective, could be a upgrad on Savard or just a replacement next year...
Other player I look into would be Jordan Greenway he would definately be a upgrade on Pezzetta and could give us Flexibility if someone get hurt
 
He was on the Canucks in the benning era where the sedins were nearing the end.

The Islanders are a team that is neither here or there and refuses to rebuild.

In neither case would I pin the misfortunes on horvat.

Regardless, I doubt the Islanders are looking to deal him.
I agree it definately isn't Horvat fault but even if he is a great player, that isn't a contract I would touch with a 10 foot pole, 30yo sign for 6more seasons at 8.5M$ total messes our structure and flexibility...
 
It's pretty obvious Hughes won't trade away anyone. Now it's about a long term 2C solution and / or a cheap add (for a 4+ round pick). I also see him being a third part in a deal that would give us a decent role piece.


Who cares. He has no trade value now, and his only path is to adjust to reality and play real hockey, not "I slow down everything and lose the puck doing so" type of game. He needs to figure out the advantages to play with pace. He win / do this with us, or he's having a shitty next contract on a doomed team.

He won't trade anyone he wants to keep. I'm not sure Matheson is on that list.
 
If Laine can stay healthy and put up decent numbers, I wonder what his trade value would be at 50% retained.

He may not like his role and ask for a trade in the summer. We'll see how things shake out. If we make a close run for the playoffs, he may want to stay with the group.

I do no see a trade that is worth it unless Habs are selling again in 2026 or prospects push very hard.

From what I know, Laine has no issues regarding Montreal as of now.
 
Well if that’s the case, he is untouchable for me. There you have it.


Yeah I would definitely draft the best C available this next draft and try to sign a UFA for 2-3 years to make the bridge for Hage and the prospect drafted.
UFAs want more than 2 or 3 years, the ones that have to take this are probably not very good.
 
There is functionally no combination of reasonable assets in Montreal that I would not move for Byfield. Hage, Mailloux and our first after the lottery to avoid a freak occurrence? Done. Add in Florida's first? Done.

The picks are magic beans and Hage will, based solely on the odds, never amount to anything.
I would think that at this stage, Mailloux has limited market value. The time to trade him was at the end of last year. Any competent hockey person can readily see that Mailloux ‘s development has plateaued at a level of his being at best a fringe NHLer.

As in most things, it’s all about timing and, regrettably in Mailloux’s case, the proverbial ship has sailed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnapVirus
(Hage) there is very limited chances to see him as a NHL 2C.

Mister expert here with the crystal ball. Hage is having a terrific D+1 season, just as good as Caufield had at the same age. You talk of overrating prospects, while you do the exact opposite.

You can keep dreaming about miracle trades, but fact is Hughes has been quite outspoken about building for the long term, even this year he repeated it, hence it's very unlikely he'll trade a strong prospect like Hage. Hughes has plenty to work with to make trades outside of his best prospects like Demi, Hage, Reinbacher and Fowler.

Luckily, Hughes is not some armchair GM frotting at the mouth at the idea of selling the farm to get a 2C. Furthermore, a rebuilding team should trade prime assets when they're about to become a contender, not to bridge the gap to become a playoff team. Your way of doing things is how we end-up in the middle of the road, instead of eventually becoming contenders.

A year ago, you would probably have traded Hutson for Ghost.
 
Wouldn't say Hage is untouchable but if he was the main piece for a real top 6 center whos around 22-26 and gets 55+ points a season, you pull the trigger.

The only untouchable prospect or picks we have is Demidov. The rest can be and should be traded for a core piece was available. Waiting is good but we could wait 2-3 years to even see Hage in the NHL and perhaps in a top 6 role
 
I do no see a trade that is worth it unless Habs are selling again in 2026 or prospects push very hard.

From what I know, Laine has no issues regarding Montreal as of now.

You think he likes playing 10 to 13 minutes a night?

But yes, I don't think Laine has gotten his trade value back up yet.

I'm bringing up Laine, because if we want to get that quality 2c, we need quality trade chips
 
Wouldn't say Hage is untouchable but if he was the main piece for a real top 6 center whos around 22-26 and gets 55+ points a season, you pull the trigger.

The only untouchable prospect or picks we have is Demidov. The rest can be and should be traded for a core piece was available. Waiting is good but we could wait 2-3 years to even see Hage in the NHL and perhaps in a top 6 role
Habs will never be able to build a pipeline of upside C prospects by making them so easily available as some in here are advocating. Maybe allow Hughes more credit for being able to get the job done in ways that involve alternate options.
 
Mister expert here with the crystal ball. Hage is having a terrific D+1 season, just as good as Caufield had at the same age. You talk of overrating prospects, while you do the exact opposite.

You can keep dreaming about miracle trades, but fact is Hughes has been quite outspoken about building for the long term, even this year he repeated it, hence it's very unlikely he'll trade a strong prospect like Hage. Hughes has plenty to work with to make trades outside of his best prospects like Demi, Hage, Reinbacher and Fowler.

Luckily, Hughes is not some armchair GM frotting at the mouth at the idea of selling the farm to get a 2C. Furthermore, a rebuilding team should trade prime assets when they're about to become a contender, not to bridge the gap to become a playoff team. Your way of doing things is how we end-up in the middle of the road, instead of eventually becoming contenders.

A year ago, you would probably have traded Hutson for Ghost.
You misunderstood me, my bad. Hage have a real shot at being a productive top 6 forward, but many scouts / experts (I'm not) seems to think he may end up a winger, no a C.
 
Habs will never be able to build a pipeline of upside C prospects by making them so easily available as some in here are advocating. Maybe allow Hughes more credit for being able to get the job done in ways that involve alternate options.
Having prospects is good but starting next season with Dach Evans and Beck as our 2-3-4 center is not acceptable. We just flushed a year of Dach . We don't need 35year olds to patch. This team needs present. You can't enter next season with just Demidov added. It sends a terrible message to the core . We need to stabilize at least the top4 in def or a 2nd center this off-season . If Hage is the price for a future player we will have 5-10 years who's a big contributor you do it. If not you keep him and wait.

We flushed Romanov for nothing.
We traded Sergachev for a pseudo center
We refused a trade base with Poehling for RoR.

Do we really want to ice this for the first game next season ?

Caufield-Suzuki-Slaf
Laine-Dach-Demidov
Newhook-Evans-Anderson
Gallagher-Beck--???

That's brutal. Hutson Caufield and Suzuki can't do everything
 
  • Like
Reactions: Takeru and Be a Hab
Having prospects is good but starting next season with Dach Evans and Beck as our 2-3-4 center is not acceptable. We just flushed a year of Dach . We don't need 35year olds to patch. This team needs present. You can't enter next season with just Demidov added. It sends a terrible message to the core . We need to stabilize at least the top4 in def or a 2nd center this off-season . If Hage is the price for a future player we will have 5-10 years who's a big contributor you do it. If not you keep him and wait.

We flushed Romanov for nothing.
We traded Sergachev for a pseudo center
We refused a trade base with Poehling for RoR.

Do we really want to ice this for the first game next season ?

Caufield-Suzuki-Slaf
Laine-Dach-Demidov
Newhook-Evans-Anderson
Gallagher-Beck--???

That's brutal. Hutson Caufield and Suzuki can't do everything
That’s a highly extreme outcome that isn’t likely to materialize for the simple reason that Hughes has accumulated such a wide assortment and number of assets that Hage or any other center the Habs end up drafting, don’t have to be tendered.

An organization with a decades-long known inability to build quality centre depth does not have the luxury of sacrificing it.

Dach is not a centre so they didn’t lose one in him, they lost a winger who has now become a liability given two major operations to the same knee. I would argue that outcomes like Dach is exactly why you prioritize quality centre depth in your pipeline or risk more years seeking it out.
 
Having prospects is good but starting next season with Dach Evans and Beck as our 2-3-4 center is not acceptable. We just flushed a year of Dach . We don't need 35year olds to patch. This team needs present. You can't enter next season with just Demidov added. It sends a terrible message to the core . We need to stabilize at least the top4 in def or a 2nd center this off-season . If Hage is the price for a future player we will have 5-10 years who's a big contributor you do it. If not you keep him and wait.

We flushed Romanov for nothing.
We traded Sergachev for a pseudo center
We refused a trade base with Poehling for RoR.

Do we really want to ice this for the first game next season ?

Caufield-Suzuki-Slaf
Laine-Dach-Demidov
Newhook-Evans-Anderson
Gallagher-Beck--???

That's brutal. Hutson Caufield and Suzuki can't do everything

They still need to find a willing dance partner with an asset worthy of trading Hage + whatever other assets are required.

It’s not an easy task finding a young top-6 C that a team wants to move on from. Our best case scenario is that the Isles wake up and decide they want to rebuild and Horvat is on the table. He’s a bit older, but he should be serviceable for the next 5-6 seasons which should line up with our window. I don’t see a situation where guys like Byfield or Lundell or anyone of their ilk are made available for say Hage + 1st.
 
They still need to find a willing dance partner with an asset worthy of trading Hage + whatever other assets are required.

It’s not an easy task finding a young top-6 C that a team wants to move on from. Our best case scenario is that the Isles wake up and decide they want to rebuild and Horvat is on the table. He’s a bit older, but he should be serviceable for the next 5-6 seasons which should line up with our window. I don’t see a situation where guys like Byfield or Lundell or anyone of their ilk are made available for say Hage + 1st.
To find a good young C you don't needs a 1st and Hage. All you need is Fleischmann and Weise.
 
That’s a highly extreme outcome that isn’t likely to materialize for the simple reason that Hughes has accumulated such a wide assortment and number of assets that Hage or any other center the Habs end up drafting, don’t have to be tendered.

An organization with a decades-long known inability to build quality centre depth does not have the luxury of sacrificing it.

Dach is not a centre so they didn’t lose one in him, they lost a winger who has now become a liability given two major operations to the same knee. I would argue that outcomes like Dach is exactly why you prioritize quality centre depth in your pipeline or risk more years seeking it out.
Pipeline is good but Hage should not be impossible to trade for an important player. If our center depth consist of 1 guy , then it's not deep at all
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vachon23
If they hadn't blown equivalent-value picks on Dach and Newhook, Hage wouldn't be a must-retain.
 
The great thing about Evans' deal is that it sets up the market for our 4th line/defensive forwards. Similar to Suzuki for our top 6 (yes i know that Laine makes more but at his current play he doesn't deserve more than Nick). I would keep Armia but at a considerable discount. He should not be making more than Evans. I would not keep Dvo, that guy can GTFO. So realistically we need a 2nd and 3rd line center.

How i see our lineup for next year:

Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Laine - X (acquired via trade) - Demidov
Gallagher/heineman - X (acquired internally) - Anderson/newhook
Gallagher/heineman - Evans - Armia (only if he signs for cheap)

If heineman comes out strong next year, we need to promote him to the 3rd line. He clearly has that offensive instinct and the habs would be doing a disservice to themselves to not exploit that. Also, we need to gradually disengage from Gally. The great thing about him is that he gives his all in every shift, so giving him a less offensive assignment may be more suited to his current play and ability.

Other than Demidov, i think everything should be on the table to acquire that elusive 2C, especially the stockpile of picks the habs have.
 
Having prospects is good but starting next season with Dach Evans and Beck as our 2-3-4 center is not acceptable. We just flushed a year of Dach . We don't need 35year olds to patch. This team needs present. You can't enter next season with just Demidov added. It sends a terrible message to the core . We need to stabilize at least the top4 in def or a 2nd center this off-season . If Hage is the price for a future player we will have 5-10 years who's a big contributor you do it. If not you keep him and wait.

We flushed Romanov for nothing.
We traded Sergachev for a pseudo center
We refused a trade base with Poehling for RoR.

Do we really want to ice this for the first game next season ?

Caufield-Suzuki-Slaf
Laine-Dach-Demidov
Newhook-Evans-Anderson
Gallagher-Beck--???

That's brutal. Hutson Caufield and Suzuki can't do everything
Missing Heinemen
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsWhiteKnightLOL
You think he likes playing 10 to 13 minutes a night?

But yes, I don't think Laine has gotten his trade value back up yet.

I'm bringing up Laine, because if we want to get that quality 2c, we need quality trade chips
Would you trade Hutson straight up for a 2C - say, Byfield?
 
Wouldn't say Hage is untouchable but if he was the main piece for a real top 6 center whos around 22-26 and gets 55+ points a season, you pull the trigger.

The only untouchable prospect or picks we have is Demidov. The rest can be and should be traded for a core piece was available. Waiting is good but we could wait 2-3 years to even see Hage in the NHL and perhaps in a top 6 role
I agree but a real top 6 center between 22 and 26 yo aren't disponible. Like never. Unless there are reclamation projects or have other issues, just like Dach, Cozens, Zegras, etc. etc.

So that pretty much means Hage is untouchable.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad