HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #91: 2025 Trade Deadline edition

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expecting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Disagree - Lindgren is very effective when matched with an offensive Dman (Makar?), De Haan is the classic definition of a depth Dman
1740854760275.png


No he’s really not. He’s awful. He was paired with Adam Fox who should make anyone look good, but not Lindgren because he’s so bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsWhiteKnightLOL
I'm not inclined to take the backs of these hockey cards seriously.
Okay then take the words of Rangers fans the last two years. They were unanimous in disliking him and saying he’s awful. I mean I don’t know how much proof people need. Statistically awful. Awful by the eye test.

But I guess he was decent 3 years ago so that’s what people who watch him play 3 times a year have in their heads.
 
Thoughts on these:

1. We trade for Seth Jones and he is our no.1 RHD. Plays with Hutson on top pair. Matheson is traded. Other pairings stay the same. Reinbacher has all the time he needs to develop, likely an issue in a couple years.

2. We trade for Nemec and he plays bottom pair with Savard getting traded. We have Nemec and Reinbacher as possible top RHD of the future.

However, I think the 2C is the most important need since Dach obviously isnt winning that spot this year.
 
Thoughts on these:

1. We trade for Seth Jones and he is our no.1 RHD. Plays with Hutson on top pair. Matheson is traded. Other pairings stay the same. Reinbacher has all the time he needs to develop, likely an issue in a couple years.

2. We trade for Nemec and he plays bottom pair with Savard getting traded. We have Nemec and Reinbacher as possible top RHD of the future.

However, I think the 2C is the most important need since Dach obviously isnt winning that spot this year.
What could Hughes give to get a real 2c? All the first picks of this year?
 
He's on LTIR.
He is coming back before the end of the season?

They can't move him now because they need his LTIR. Maybe an off-season move. Only 2 years left. Would be a good short term pickup.
Yes I meant as an offseason move. I think he'd be a lot cheaper than most alternatives and his contract is pretty much exactly what we want for the time being.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
Thoughts on these:

1. We trade for Seth Jones and he is our no.1 RHD. Plays with Hutson on top pair. Matheson is traded. Other pairings stay the same. Reinbacher has all the time he needs to develop, likely an issue in a couple years.

2. We trade for Nemec and he plays bottom pair with Savard getting traded. We have Nemec and Reinbacher as possible top RHD of the future.

However, I think the 2C is the most important need since Dach obviously isnt winning that spot this year.
1 . Keep that twat as far as humanly possible from Montreal
2 . I don't dislike the idea, but what are you trading for Nemec? The Devils won't give him away for Savard and Evans, unless it's a signed Evans at a very team-friendly deal, and that's probably not even enough.
 
What could Hughes give to get a real 2c? All the first picks of this year?

If we were picking say top 5-6 and 15th Im thinking it could be pretty close. But then we want an in prime productive 2 way C , and why would a team trade such a guy away ? Just because the value is there doesnt make a deal. Top Cs for top Ds maybe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catanddogguitarrr

Man, says something about the added value an ironman player brings to a club.

Of course, some may be freak injuries and bad luck but when a player suffers so many significant ones, a GM’s managerial IQ is also measured by how well he does his due diligence and knowing when to cut bait or not committing long term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Takeru
If we were picking say top 5-6 and 15th Im thinking it could be pretty close. But then we want an in prime productive 2 way C , and why would a team trade such a guy away ? Just because the value is there doesnt make a deal. Top Cs for top Ds maybe.
If Habs are picking 5-6, there is bound to be a top 6C worth selecting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catanddogguitarrr

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad