HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #88: 2024 Off-Season Thread

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
7,932
11,879
Canada
Laine is still a long shot to be a permanent solution and Bennett is never going to be a Hab so the point is moot.
If however you had a sure thing with a healthy Laine you'd be looking at a very hard decision.
Laine is a first line player and a healthy Laine is definitely better than Cole Caufield.
So the question would be what do you do with Caufield.
Yeah....I'm not thinking we get Bennett....was merely responding to someone else.

Honestly....doesn't matter to me, if Laine hits peak and forces Caufield down to 2nd line, thats a good problem to have. I'm looking ahead to a top 6 that are all first line guys. Maybe they are lower end 1st line guys....but 1st liners none the less. Mix and match as you see fit.

I like,

Slaf - Nick- Cole --- 1a
Laine - Dach - Demidov --- 1b

Also, we have Newhook who can play up...and potentially Hage come 26-27. Not a ton of room for anyone at this point. Higher end third liner to pair with Newhook would be perfect.
 
Last edited:

calder candidate

Registered User
Feb 25, 2003
5,087
3,037
Montreal
Visit site
With Florida now putting big money (and years) into Verhaeghe, Tkachuk, Barkov, Lundell and Reinhart up front, I wonder if the Habs could grab Sam Bennett as a UFA in the summer?

Assuming that David Savard, Christian Dvorak and Joel Armia are all moved out on or before the trade deadline, and Bennett hasn’t re-signed in Florida, I’d be willing to offer him a significant deal to come north to play for the Habs.

I think he’d be the perfect 2nd line center behind Suzuki, and he’d add a much needed injection of nastiness with his ability to score.
I’d be willing to offer him close to the Suzuki deal, 8 years x 7.0 million. This would move Dach over to the wing, and give the Habs a legit cup contender lineup (in my opinion).

Laine - Suzuki - Slafkovsky
Caufield - Bennett - Dach
Demidov - Newhook - Anderson
Tuch - Kapanen - Gallagher

Matheson - Guhle
Hutson - ____
Xhekaj - Struble

Something along those lines anyway.
I agree that Benett could be a target and he a underrated piece but he will be 29yo no way would I give him 8years (probably could only give him 7 anyway) to that kind of money with he play style that won’t age well also he is a great complement to elite players not sure going the same in MTL.

Too much money, too many years for a completely player (even if he is a great competitor). There is a reason why FLA lock up everyone, even if Benett is an important piece they think he is a complement and the other guy are the one making a difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waitin425

Leto

Registered User
Feb 16, 2023
738
1,668
We need a stabilizing D back there, and one of quality and experience.

Unless you're looking to overpay an aging Ekblad (who I think would prefer to stay in Florida) in free agency, the only plausible option for the right side is Rasmus Andersson via trade.

Otherwise, I have Dobson and Erik Cernak on my delusional wish list :confused:.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,632
27,754
East Coast
Actually we have more chance of landing Sid than Bennett.

I actually think Pens will finish bottom 10 this season and Crosby will be open to be traded.

Pens are in for a rough ride! I agree. They are in rebuild denial and missing out on accelerating their rebuild buy trading assets that still have value.

Crosby won't retire as a Pens. I'm about 80% sure. haha

I agree that Benett could be a target and he a underrated piece but he will be 29yo no way would I give him 8years (probably could only give him 7 anyway) to that kind of money with he play style that won’t age well also he is a great complement to elite players not sure going the same in MTL.

Too much money, too many years for a completely player (even if he is a great competitor). There is a reason why FLA lock up everyone, even if Benett is an important piece they think he is a complement and the other guy are the one making a difference.

The Bennet type of trade is something to consider after most of our youth mature (especially the D). Timing is off by trying to fill holes now via trades/UFA signings. Sens made that mistake and so many others as well.

Let the kids grow together and only make circumstantial trades like the Laine one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benstheman

calder candidate

Registered User
Feb 25, 2003
5,087
3,037
Montreal
Visit site
The Bennet type of trade is something to consider after most of our youth mature (especially the D). Timing is off by trying to fill holes now via trades/UFA signings. Sens made that mistake and so many others as well.

Let the kids grow together and only make circumstantial trades like the Laine one.
Going in to next season with Laine, Demidov, Young Guy improving. I have no issue going to get a UFA to plug and play to address a need and fill specific role I rather sign someone than trading away assets in some cases. But if you are signing and complementary or role player you can’t give him 1st line money on a long term contract.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,632
27,754
East Coast
Going in to next season with Laine, Demidov, Young Guy improving. I have no issue going to get a UFA to plug and play to address a need and fill specific role I rather sign someone than trading away assets in some cases. But if you are signing and complementary or role player you can’t give him 1st line money on a long term contract.

I think we are going to find out a lot about our team this season. Not going to get all the answers but we will know our holes better.

I just think we need to be careful with the salary cap management. It can creep up on us if we are not careful. Imagine signing a UFA (spending our available cap) and then in 3 years, we are in cap trouble because guys like Hutson, Newhook, Dach, Xhekaj need raises and we don't have enough space to sign? Cap should rise yes and we will have expiring contracts (deadweight per say) but I'm sure Gorton/Hughes will do cap future calculations over and over again before they dig deep in free agency.
 

Benstheman

Registered User
Nov 20, 2014
7,134
3,342
Unless you're looking to overpay an aging Ekblad (who I think would prefer to stay in Florida) in free agency, the only plausible option for the right side is Rasmus Andersson via trade.

Otherwise, I have Dobson and Erik Cernak on my delusional wish list :confused:.
Switch Dobson for Andersson and your not THAT delusional.
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
32,145
35,402
Buffalo 0-3 maybe they look to make a splash early to get the team going.

They have some nice pieces from top 6 forwards to bottom 6 forwards for the Habs to add as they're a team with a lot of size and not much heart, though
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,149
25,535
Buffalo 0-3 maybe they look to make a splash early to get the team going.

They have some nice pieces from top 6 forwards to bottom 6 forwards for the Habs to add as they're a team with a lot of size and not much heart, though
Who would they want from us? Brendan Gallagher, lol.
 

Deus ex machina

Registered User
Sep 12, 2023
609
515
Barron for Levi - Buf’s looking for a puck moving RDman
Yes, please.
Habs will throw in Primeau too.

Seriously, Levi looked really solid in his game against New Jersey. If they trade him, it'll be for something more significant than Barron.

Habs waited too long to trade Barron. I don't think he has much value anymore.
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
14,915
16,512
No need, Dobes is better.. We can find better deals with Barron. He would probably need to be in a package for Rasmus Andersson for example.
Based on what exactly, he isn’t even dominant at AHL level.

Levi has actually proven it w Team Canada & NCAA - this is the buy low moment if Buf even decided to trade him
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
94,874
104,891
Halifax
Based on what exactly, he isn’t even dominant at AHL level.

Levi has actually proven it w Team Canada & NCAA - this is the buy low moment if Buf even decided to trade him

Levi proved it on the same team that made Primeau looked amazing in the NCAA.

Dobes was dominant and played the most starts after the first dip as he transitioned to the level.

I am not ready to say one is better than the other, but it's not a stretch that Dobes will be better as he also was dominant on a much worse program in the NCAA and he's got tools that Levi will never have.
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
14,915
16,512
Levi proved it on the same team that made Primeau looked amazing in the NCAA.

Dobes was dominant and played the most starts after the first dip as he transitioned to the level.

I am not ready to say one is better than the other, but it's not a stretch that Dobes will be better as he also was dominant on a much worse program in the NCAA and he's got tools that Levi will never have.
Dobes also needs more AHL seasoning, whereas Levi can help “NOW” which is the issue needing to be addressed (backup capable of 25-30 solid starts)
 

vokiel

#MolsonIsntWine
Jan 31, 2007
18,180
3,903
Montréal
Dobes also needs more AHL seasoning, whereas Levi can help “NOW” which is the issue needing to be addressed (backup capable of 25-30 solid starts)
Help in nets now doesn't really look that pressing. We could draft a highly touted goalie and in 3-4 years, he's with Fowler and Dobes in the depth chart, that works. Levi won't turn this team on its head, so it's not really that great of a return for a RD.

Imho working with Dobes is better.
 

Kosseca

Registered User
Feb 23, 2020
1,223
1,070
Dobes also needs more AHL seasoning, whereas Levi can help “NOW” which is the issue needing to be addressed (backup capable of 25-30 solid starts)
why now? because Primeau play very poorly in 1 game? Dont get me wrong, we lost the game because of him, but we have yet to establish a pattern this season for him.

Asset would be better use to upgrade other position then a backup G.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad