NeptunesTrident
Registered User
- Feb 22, 2007
- 1,599
- 1,127
100% agree.Dach is certainly the wildcard. He really needs to play the whole season
100% agree.Dach is certainly the wildcard. He really needs to play the whole season
At worst for the habs it is 11th ova, they can always put conditions on it to protect it.There is no way to know where Calgary's pick will be. And there is no way to know if Laine will be anything. Does he care more about Fortnite than hockey? Who knows? Will he take a year to get over his injury? I am doubtful HuGo trades a 1st for magic beans. Maybe for a Necas or Zegras.
At worst for the habs it is 11th ova, they can always put conditions on it to protect it.
Magic beans, hardly.
Yeah, me too, that’s why I’d be willing to move it for Laine.think we get Florida's pick no matter what at this point
There is no way to know where Calgary's pick will be. And there is no way to know if Laine will be anything. Does he care more about Fortnite than hockey? Who knows? Will he take a year to get over his injury? I am doubtful HuGo trades a 1st for magic beans. Maybe for a Necas or Zegras.
No way to know if Laine will be able to contribute next year. Since we aren't even sure of the terms of the Florida pick no way to know if it will even be a 2025 pick.At worst for the habs it is 11th ova, they can always put conditions on it to protect it.
Magic beans, hardly.
I'd probably do that in a second , but I want McGroarty tooYeah, me too, that’s why I’d be willing to move it for Laine.
Not necessarily. Carolina could still trade Necas. Their owner might not be happy they couldn't move him and keep trying.Necas signed today, so the list of NHL players he could have added dropped to Laine or Zegras at this point
That’s why teams do their due diligence.No way to know if Laine will be able to contribute next year. Since we aren't even sure of the terms of the Florida pick no way to know if it will even be a 2025 pick.
I think PL is going to turn it around. Imagine getting both, that would be going for it.I'd probably do that in a second , but I want McGroarty too
It's not so much the line sucks LG. It's more that none of those 3 players have really proven anything. Sure I can sit here and say that the 3 combined will get 140+ points. Hell I could say that they could become our real 1st line.Right. And it's how you defend it that matters.
Hey, if you think our 2nd line sucks and we need to fix it... cool. But say why. Give a ballpark as to how you think the line will produce. If you can't do that then how the hell is there a conversation?
Either the poster thinks they'll do 80 points each and doesn't understand what a second line looks like or they think they'll all do 25 in which case I'm going to ask them to back up why. There's no answer though. Only "THAT LINE SUCKS! If we have that we'll be bottom five!" Okay...
No way to know if it makes sense since we know nothing about his recovery from injury and from his other problems. I leave it up to HuGo to determine if he is worth going after and at what cost.I'd probably do that in a second , but I want McGroarty too
Apparently the Florida pick is protected but who knows what lottery protected is. Florida played well over their head, has had 2 long seasons and lost a lot of their defense. And they have had NO injuries. Anything could happen.That’s why teams do their due diligence, lol. Haha, he had shoulder surgery, he’s not in a wheelchair. Habs have Drs too.
And yes, we know the conditions, if Calgary is top 10 they get Florida’s, and since they are cup champs I’m sure it will be a low one. Once again, they can put conditions on it to protect it.
I think PL is going to turn it around. Imagine getting both, that would be going for it.
I agree, anything could happen but I’m more than confident they are not dropping like a rock.No way to know if it makes sense since we know nothing about his recovery from injury and from his other problems. I leave it up to HuGo to determine if he is worth going after and at what cost.
Apparently the Florida pick is protected but who knows what lottery protected is. Florida played well over their head, has had 2 long seasons and lost a lot of their defense. And they have had NO injuries. Anything could happen.
I'll give you that argument for Roy. He's a rookie and there's less to go on with him.It's not so much the line sucks LG. It's more that none of those 3 players have really proven anything. Sure I can sit here and say that the 3 combined will get 140+ points. Hell I could say that they could become our real 1st line.
I see no reason why it won't work if they played together. Dach's a strong two way player. Newhook is a speedster and Roy's high IQ.The reason why our 1st line has done so well is they've developed chemistry. With the 2nd line you'd like to try. It's like you've chosen our next 3 best offensive forwards, and put them together on a line.
No reason we can't do both.With our first line. You have Suzuki who is a solid two way player. Caufield is the goal scorer. Who has also improved his defensive game. Slafkovsky is a freaking bull, who is also becoming more confident with his creative skills.
So instead of asking how many points we feel those three will obtain. I think it would be wiser to look at how well they compliment each other.
I agree with you, and maybe I didn’t articulate it as well as you did but unproven is exactly what I said. I also think the second line needs physicality and size. Neither Roy or Newhook bring that. Moreover, I said many times a player is more than just points, it’s his complete game.It's not so much the line sucks LG. It's more that none of those 3 players have really proven anything. Sure I can sit here and say that the 3 combined will get 140+ points. Hell I could say that they could become our real 1st line.
The reason why our 1st line has done so well is they've developed chemistry. With the 2nd line you'd like to try. It's like you've chosen our next 3 best offensive forwards, and put them together on a line.
With our first line. You have Suzuki who is a solid two way player. Caufield is the goal scorer. Who has also improved his defensive game. Slafkovsky is a freaking bull, who is also becoming more confident with his creative skills.
So instead of asking how many points we feel those three will obtain. I think it would be wiser to look at how well they compliment each other.
Yes we've seen what they can do over a short period of time, individually. You're putting a lot of faith that they'll be able to do it as a unit.I'll give you that argument for Roy. He's a rookie and there's less to go on with him.
The other two, we've seen what they can do. Yes, they've been limited by injury but I have little doubt that they can handle secondary scoring duties. Especially Dach.
It's all going to come down to health.
Yes Newhook is a speedster and Roy provides high IQ. Until Dach improves his face off ability. He isn't what I would call a strong two way player. Also who is going to provide the goals on this line? This is why I'd like to add Laine.I see no reason why it won't work if they played together. Dach's a strong two way player. Newhook is a speedster and Roy's high IQ.
Honestly though, It could very well be that CC goes with Dach and they move Newhook up. Hugo's whole plan is to create a team where you don't know which line is the first or second or third... he's said that in interviews before.
Down the road you may see things like Beck with Slaf, CC with Dach and Nick with Demidov...
Yes, but you're question was pretty much asking how many points they would score as a unit. When there are many other factors to consider when putting together a line.No reason we can't do both.
If someone says "they suck"... they should tell us what they expect then no? What exactly is the catastrophe in answering that question? That you might be wrong? I'm sorry but if you say "that line sucks" then you should tell us how you think they'll do and why you think they'll fail. That's not a big ask man.
You probably did, but I'm old and have a short attention span lolI agree with you, and maybe I didn’t articulate it as well as you did but unproven is exactly what I said. I also think the second line needs physicality and size. Neither Roy or Newhook bring that. Newhook being a third liner, that’s just my opinion.
“There second line is all band-aids, not a legit top 6. Newhook is a third liner, and Roy has played 20+ games & is unproven, and no one knows if Dach can stay healthy. They have no real 2nd line.”
Anyway, I’m convinced KH will add a top 6 forward this summer which will help solidify the problem.
100%, very logical rationale post, thanks.You probably did, but I'm old and have a short attention span lol
LG himself has brought that up. He's okay with adding a top 6 player. He's against adding Laine, since he wouldn't contribute that.
I like Newhook. Personally I see him more as a tweener. He realistically should be a 3rd line player. But he won't hurt you if he has to fill in on the 2nd line, due to injury.
I'm not willing to go out on a limb and say that they could never be a solid 2nd line. I just don't see the chemistry between the 3 of them. As I mentioned earlier, since it's been noted that HuGo is looking to add a top 6 player. I don't think they see it either.
I think so too. I'd be quite surprised if we didn't add another top 6 player.
If they don't we'll just scramble the lines.Yes we've seen what they can do over a short period of time, individually. You're putting a lot of faith that they'll be able to do it as a unit.
They don't have to be equal ability. They'll never be equal ability. They weren't equal ability when we had Richer on one line and Smith on another. But with the talent we have we can probably put three duos together on each line to go with a support player. That's down the road though. At that point in time you'll have Demidov, Hage, Beck... depth is coming but it's going to take some time. We're a team in transition, not a contender. Hughes is looking at the long game and that's where he wants to get to.Yes Newhook is a speedster and Roy provides high IQ. Until Dach improves his face off ability. He isn't what I would call a strong two way player. Also who is going to provide the goals on this line? This is why I'd like to add Laine.
Ok, but I find that highly unlikely, since Caufield/Suzuki/Slafkovsky did so well together. Yes he did say that. But the reality is, it would be extremely difficult to have 3 balanced lines, with equal ability.
Yep. Already agreed with you on this. Hugo has said this and I expect he'll do something. But I also wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't. I don't think it's a concern. We are a team in transition, not a contender. Our top six is fine. Beyond it, we lack depth. And there will be injuries. That's why I think he'll add somebody, not because he doesn't have faith in those players. It's that he doesn't have faith that Armia, Gallagher and Anderson won't fill that role well if somebody gets hurt for an extended period of time.We're not talking about down the road. We're talking about this upcoming season. HuGo has also said they want to try to add a top 6 player. That right there shows me they don't have quite the confidence in our top 6, that you do.
Shit or get off the pot bud.Yes, but you're question was pretty much asking how many points they would score as a unit. When there are many other factors to consider when putting together a line.
Again yes, reading posters say they'll suck. Or that's a weak line without giving reasons burns my ass too. lol
If they don't we'll just scramble the lines.
Like I said, I won't be surprised to see CC with Dach. That first line is not locked in stone. I think Dach and CC might actualy be a better fit.
They don't have to be equal ability. They'll never be equal ability. They weren't equal ability when we had Richer on one line and Smith on another. But with the talent we have we can probably put three duos together on each line to go with a support player. That's down the road though. At that point in time you'll have Demidov, Hage, Beck... depth is coming but it's going to take some time. We're a team in transition, not a contender. Hughes is looking at the long game and that's where he wants to get to.
For now, I'd say our top six is fine. Not awesome. Not cup worthy but certainly not terrible.
Yep. Already agreed with you on this. Hugo has said this and I expect he'll do something. But I also wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't. I don't think it's a concern. We are a team in transition, not a contender. Our top six is fine. Beyond it, we lack depth. And there will be injuries. That's why I think he'll add somebody, not because he doesn't have faith in those players. It's that he doesn't have faith that Armia, Gallagher and Anderson won't fill that role well if somebody gets hurt for an extended period of time.
But I also think Hughes realizes that whether we get somebody or not, we'll still miss. I don't think he sees this as something urgent that must be rectified now. We're still very likely going to be out of the playoffs.
Shit or get off the pot bud.
"They suck! We'll finish bottom five with that top six! Bunch a band-aids!" Okay... then what the f*** do you think they'll do? "Well, ah er ah gee..." I mean...
"I can't possibly guess at what they'll do. But I KNOW they suck and we'll finish bottom five with that crappy group of players."Ain’t Carnac, can’t predict points. I gave the very same reasons many times, uproven, health, etc, you just didn’t want to hear it!
A dog and his bone, lol.
Thank you, I have my moments100%, very logical rationale post, thanks.
They have to add something up front if not to just show the core guys they are supporting them.
I told you my reasons. Unproven, health, size etc. Many Times. For some reason you are taking that personally. You think they will be ok, I think that line is weak, calm down, it’s just an opinion, they don’t have to be the same."I can't possibly guess at what they'll do. But I KNOW they suck and we'll finish bottom five with that crappy group of players."
Got it.
That’s one of my biggest reasons, not to mention I also think Laine has huge upside and a lot to prove. Don’t blame him for wanting out of cbj.Thank you, I have my moments
That's another point that needs to be addressed. We have young veteran players, who are chomping at the bit to get this party started. It's all fine and dandy to say, "Screw it, we'll wait another year". Realistically, it's a good idea, like you've mentioned, to support them.
Thank you! Now we can have a conversation based on expectations.I just told you my reasons, lol. Unproven, health, size etc. Many Times. For some reason you are taking that personally.
Points:
Dach - 50
Roy - 35
Newhook - 45
Again, that's easier said then done. Suzuki's line was one of the best in the last half of the season. Unless their play drops off. I can't see them making any changes. Regardless of how well or how poorly the 2nd line might play.If they don't we'll just scramble the lines.
Like I said, I won't be surprised to see CC with Dach. That first line is not locked in stone. I think Dach and CC might actualy be a better fit.
Sorry, I misunderstood.They don't have to be equal ability. They'll never be equal ability. They weren't equal ability when we had Richer on one line and Smith on another. But with the talent we have we can probably put three duos together on each line to go with a support player. That's down the road though. At that point in time you'll have Demidov, Hage, Beck... depth is coming but it's going to take some time. We're a team in transition, not a contender. Hughes is looking at the long game and that's where he wants to get to.
For now, I'd say our top six is fine. Not awesome. Not cup worthy but certainly not terrible.
If by "fine" you mean average. Then yes, but I don't think they would provide us with the step forward that HuGo is looking for. Agreed, we're one or two injuries from having Gally and Anderson or Armia in our top 6. Unless Roy has a strong camp (he's far from guaranteed a spot). If we don't add anyone, it wouldn't surprise me if we did see one of them there.Yep. Already agreed with you on this. Hugo has said this and I expect he'll do something. But I also wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't. I don't think it's a concern. We are a team in transition, not a contender. Our top six is fine. Beyond it, we lack depth. And there will be injuries. That's why I think he'll add somebody, not because he doesn't have faith in those players. It's that he doesn't have faith that Armia, Gallagher and Anderson won't fill that role well if somebody gets hurt for an extended period of time.
But I also think Hughes realizes that whether we get somebody or not, we'll still miss. I don't think he sees this as something urgent that must be rectified now. We're still very likely going to be out of the playoffs.