Halakitlikethat
Registered User
Calgary’s first and either Reinbacher or Mailloux and maybe another piece depending on which one of them is in the trade. I really doubt that the team would do this though.What do you offer?
Calgary’s first and either Reinbacher or Mailloux and maybe another piece depending on which one of them is in the trade. I really doubt that the team would do this though.What do you offer?
Travel on private charters , grade A poon chasing you , retire by 35 … oh noes what if I’m traded during the holidaysWith grumpy teenagers and a stay-at-home wife with a shopping addiction I’m actually paying for my life to be a shitshow so I have zero sympathy
Isn't Carrier on IR? You can trade for players on IR?
But I guess that means Savard won't be extended.
Vancouver GM wants help for his D corp now, not next season. But Matheson might be too old for what Alvin is aiming for anyhow.
Guess you should haveI don't believe Dreger
Newhook does not play complacently.I always felt Both Dach and Newhook were wingers who can play center. Dach with his size/strength stands a better shot at being an effective center but it's not playing out like we would prefer.
If there was a trade to make, I'd consider one or both of Dach/Newhook. Don't hate the players but I just don't think they are the pieces we need. And my fear is they have very good seasons in the last year of their bridge deals and then get greedy and ask for a stupid contract based on one season because they worked harder. Then after the contract, they get complacent again. It's tracking that way anyway and you see this very often with many players. Not many are highly self motivated where their low points are not far off from their high points... regardless of contract status.
Carrier is a better player then DesharnaisI thought Habs would be interested in Desharnais instead of Carrier. Maybe the price was too stiff for Desharnais or Habs did not had what Canucks wanted.
Doug Harvey, Serge Savard, Chris Chelios, Guy Carbonneau, Kirk Muller, Mike Keane, Pierre Turgeon, Vincent Damphousse, Max PaciorettyI don't know if Montreal has ever traded a current captain.
Carrier is a better player then Desharnais
A Desharnais-Xhekaj combo would had been interesting to watch.It’s true. I’d have been happy picking up Desharnais for the physical side of things but he’s definitively a bottom pairing or extra defenceman. Carrier can play top-4 if we need him to.
for fans of the other teamA Desharnais-Xhekaj combo would had been interesting to watch.
Nothing... let he train in Laval... he doesn't have to play games.And do what with Primeau? No place for hm if he passes through waivers. Need Dobes to return and they can waive Primeau and call up Hughes.
The difference is Desharnais plays roughly 15 minutes average TOI, Carrier is at 20.I thought Habs would be interested in Desharnais instead of Carrier. Maybe the price was too stiff for Desharnais or Habs did not had what Canucks wanted.
That makes 0 sense for the Canucks. They're not moving their star center for an undersized winger that brings significantly less production.Futa yesterday purposed a trade built around Caufield and other pieces for Pettersson? He suggested a 2nd and Savard as other pieces.
I thought Habs would be interested in Desharnais instead of Carrier. Maybe the price was too stiff for Desharnais or Habs did not had what Canucks wanted.
Don't think so.Trade Freeze kicks in tonight at midnight. So anyone think Habs will make another move today right before the freeze?
Matheson for Vancouver 1st and Desharnais.Personally and selfishly, I'd want Habs to get Desharnais, as well, for the third pair.
A monster sized RD (listed 6'7" and 226 lbs). Just imagine the kind of havoc him and Xhekaj can create on a pairing together.
Not to mention, Desharnais is also a Philippe Lecavalier client with Quartexx.