sampollock
Registered User
then let's do it.Jiriceck is more talented than Mailloux
We3kings?
then let's do it.Jiriceck is more talented than Mailloux
Now, does that mean a deal is imminent? Not exactly but I do expect something to be done sooner than later...but hold your horses if you're expecting something done by this weekend...although it only takes one phone call and things can change quickly.
That's what I love about this board. You get your fix of hockey talks and laughter along the way. Thank you!Now, does that mean a deal is imminent? Not exactly but I do expect something to be done sooner than later...but hold your horses if you're expecting something done by this weekend...although it only takes one phone call and things can change quickly.
I think that's a good guess on Hutson but it's difficult to predict at this point what will happen with Dach.It won't. Dach will sign a contract similar to Guhle. Hutson will probably sign a contract around 7m.
Also Gally is one major injury from retiring to LTIR. Gally and Anderson contract won't be a problem.
Absolutely not.
I wouldn't take Nick Robertson on waivers.
Well, this settles that.
So Nick is trash...
Why? Why is Roy a bust? That's so weird. He's the same age as Slaf basically.I would venture to say that neither Newhook and Roy have a future with this team.
Mailloux has way more offensive skills. Pair him with Struble or an improved Xhekaj in the future.I'm not doing that. Mailloux has a decent chance at becoming a better player than Jiricek.
Roy is not a bust, but to be effective, he will need to play in a top 9 role and he may end up like Barron, redundant and without a "chair". He also not the typical 3rd line W so... given the over all construction of the team... the question need to be asked: can we leverage him in a trade to improve elsewhere?Why? Why is Roy a bust? That's so weird. He's the same age as Slaf basically.
This x 2000.Roy is not a bust, but to be effective, he will need to play in a top 9 role and he may end up like Barron, redundant and without a "chair". He also not the typical 3rd line W so... given the over all construction of the team... the question need to be asked: can we leverage him in a trade to improve elsewhere?
I would try to package him and Newhook for example for a 2C.
Roy is not a bust, but to be effective, he will need to play in a top 9 role and he may end up like Barron, redundant and without a "chair". He also not the typical 3rd line W so... given the over all construction of the team... the question need to be asked: can we leverage him in a trade to improve elsewhere?
I would try to package him and Newhook for example for a 2C.
Roy can do it all to get to the NHL. Look at what he did with Bedard in the WJC. It's crazy how people are ready to get rid of him, we have literally two top 9 wingers on the team?Roy is not a bust, but to be effective, he will need to play in a top 9 role and he may end up like Barron, redundant and without a "chair". He also not the typical 3rd line W so... given the over all construction of the team... the question need to be asked: can we leverage him in a trade to improve elsewhere?
I would try to package him and Newhook for example for a 2C.
How is his trade value low now?
Maybe I'm reading this wrong but you'd trade those 3 players and a 1st for a Monahan type player?I don't see Roy and Newhook getting a good 2c at this time. They would have to be really producing to get that return.
Best shot our second top 6 C are Hage, Dach, Demidov, and our 2025 1st. Monahan like ufa would be a nice stop gap.
Roy and Newhook might get us nice bottom six sandpaper if we can't get that in other ways.