HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #88: 2024-25 Season

Adriatic

Registered User
Feb 27, 2004
6,745
4,609
They can't unless they find a taker for the current vets we have. We do have vets contrary to popular belief. They are just bad. If we add vets it must be to replace current vets and not remove kids from the lineup.
I don't care what they do as long as the add solid veterans that can play in key positions. We're just too green at every position if the goal is to progress.
 

junyab

Registered User
Jan 22, 2013
1,984
1,150
The guy Id be after is Radko Gudas. Not sure if the Ducks need him right now but he'd fit in nicely.
 

sampollock

Registered User
Jun 7, 2008
42,495
22,813
in my home
According to Pagnotta, the general manager wants to acquire a top-four caliber right-shot defenseman to solidify the blue line, as well as a rugged, versatile forward who could be useful on the second or third line.

"Several reports surfaced last week that the Canadiens were in the market for a top-tier defenseman, while TFP's David Pagnotta first reported on SiriusXM NHL Network Radio that Hughes was also exploring the trade market for a gritty, wiry forward to add to the team's second or third line."
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,350
58,439
Citizen of the world
I
Something in place would refer to something already in the works. Bargainbin had no plan. If I'm rebuilding a car and keep the frame, its not a rebuild? It was a rebuild already in the process? No, a rebuild starts when the owner begins to strip down the parts need replacing and keeping what they can. An NHL rebuild doesn't need to move absolutely everyone in the organization. You assess you're roster and prospect pipeline and decide who does and who doesn't fit with the new direction of the club. Cole and Suzuki were still young enough to last through the rebuild window and would still be in their prime when the rebuild is over and transition to contending.

If you start with a 2010 Ferrari with 5000 miles it should take a lot less time to rebuild than a 1966 barn find.

Its a pretty simple concept, I'm not sure why people find this so hard to get.

The fact they kept key players tells us the rebuild should end faster than a true rebuild
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,165
36,410
According to Pagnotta, the general manager wants to acquire a top-four caliber right-shot defenseman to solidify the blue line, as well as a rugged, versatile forward who could be useful on the second or third line.

"Several reports surfaced last week that the Canadiens were in the market for a top-tier defenseman, while TFP's David Pagnotta first reported on SiriusXM NHL Network Radio that Hughes was also exploring the trade market for a gritty, wiry forward to add to the team's second or third line."
Frederic might be available and he's a tweener, likely more of a 3rd liner, but the Habs aren't a good team so he might work on the 2nd
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,385
106,494
Halifax
I

If you start with a 2010 Ferrari with 5000 miles it should take a lot less time to rebuild than a 1966 barn find.

Its a pretty simple concept, I'm not sure why people find this so hard to get.

The fact they kept key players tells us the rebuild should end faster than a true rebuild

Even if you accept that premise as true. The fastest rebuilds to regular playoff contention is 5 years. We are two seasons out from that.
 

Habs

Who needs Michkov when you've got Bustbacher
Feb 28, 2002
22,633
17,309
and weak. this team does not play hard on the puck
weak weak weak

teams see that and use that against them
we are very easy to contain at either end of the rink. I really think a line with Anderson-Laine-Dach would be very hard to manage for other teams
 
  • Like
Reactions: sampollock

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,490
10,522
Nova Scotia
Why claim Max Jones when you could just call up Davidson or Tuch if you’re looking for physicality?

Max Jones is about as intellectually challenged of a hockey player as I’ve ever seen play, and that in itself is impressive, in a non positive way.
You don't want Laval to continue on a roll?
 

HabsCode

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
3,129
3,660
I wouldn't be surprised. By next year, he's likely not a top 9 fit. We have Laine, Caufield, Slafkovsky & Demidov as top 6 wingers next season. That puts Newhook on 3rd line.

I can't see him staying at center. He's a winger.
So Newhook, Dvo and Armia gone?

Slaf - Suzuki - Caufield
Laine - Dach - Demidov
Gallagher - Evans - Roy
Eineman - Kapanen - Anderson

We desperately need bottom 6 size and sandpaper
 
  • Like
Reactions: rahad

Leto

Registered User
Feb 16, 2023
904
1,953
I wouldn't be surprised. By next year, he's likely not a top 9 fit. We have Laine, Caufield, Slafkovsky & Demidov as top 6 wingers next season. That puts Newhook on 3rd line.

I can't see him staying at center. He's a winger.

Plus we need more truculence on the bottom 6. He ain't it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs

Kosseca

Registered User
Feb 23, 2020
1,306
1,158
So Newhook, Dvo and Armia gone?

Slaf - Suzuki - Caufield
Laine - Dach - Demidov
Gallagher - Evans - Roy
Eineman - Kapanen - Anderson

We desperately need bottom 6 size and sandpaper

I think that you can only pencil-in these players for next season:

Slaf - Suzuki - CC
Laine - Dach - Demidov
XXX - Evans - XXX
XXX - XXX - XXX

I think that Evans will be re-sign. Obviously, Armia and Dvorak are gone.

Seeing how Gally is playing, I dont think KH would move him and it may be hard to move Anderson, but I dont think that any other guy are safe. So even with these two, you have room to improve the bottom 6.

Roy/Newhook/Heineman/Kapanen are all trade chips.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsCode

Habs

Who needs Michkov when you've got Bustbacher
Feb 28, 2002
22,633
17,309
I think that you can only pencil-in these players for next season:

Slaf - Suzuki - CC
Laine - Dach - Demidov
XXX - Evans - XXX
XXX - XXX - XXX

I think that Evans will be re-sign. Obviously, Armia and Dvorak are gone.

Seeing how Gally is playing, I dont think KH would move him and it may be hard to move Anderson, but I dont think that any other guy are safe. So even with these two, you have room to improve the bottom 6.

Roy/Newhook/Heineman/Kapanen are all trade chips.

Good way to look at it. I don't think Andy/Gally are moveable , Evans will probably get moved if anyone. Still room for 4 more newcomers either way up front.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

Kosseca

Registered User
Feb 23, 2020
1,306
1,158
Good way to look at it. I don't think Andy/Gally are moveable , Evans will probably get moved if anyone. Still room for 4 more newcomers either way up front.

I'm incline to re-sign Evans if the price is right. He's been the only guy that gives a **** every game, he's very good on the PK and ok on faceoffs. If we want to be more competitive, we need to keep these guys.

You are right that moving Gally and Anderson is mission impossible, but Gally is playing good enough.
 

Goalfield13

In Bilbo We Trust
Aug 31, 2021
1,990
2,678
Trading Evans would be so stupid. The guy shoulders so much responsibility that people take for granted. Ask Suzuki if he wants the team to trade Evans lol. Evans is way too important for our bottom 6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rahad

HabsCode

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
3,129
3,660
Trading Evans would be so stupid. The guy shoulders so much responsibility that people take for granted. Ask Suzuki if he wants the team to trade Evans lol. Evans is way too important for our bottom 6.
It would hurt us like losing Danault hurted us.
 

Adriatic

Registered User
Feb 27, 2004
6,745
4,609
Trading Evans would be so stupid. The guy shoulders so much responsibility that people take for granted. Ask Suzuki if he wants the team to trade Evans lol. Evans is way too important for our bottom 6.
Remember in July when some clowns wanted to get rid of him for no reason. Bro's our best player lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goalfield13

Habs

Who needs Michkov when you've got Bustbacher
Feb 28, 2002
22,633
17,309
I'm incline to re-sign Evans if the price is right. He's been the only guy that gives a **** every game, he's very good on the PK and ok on faceoffs. If we want to be more competitive, we need to keep these guys.

You are right that moving Gally and Anderson is mission impossible, but Gally is playing good enough.

I only suggested Evans being moved because that's the trade rumour out there, and who teams are calling about. I'd keep him too, quite like how he's been playing

Remember in July when some clowns wanted to get rid of him for no reason. Bro's our best player lol
He's been solid, probably why teams are calling.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad