HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #85 - Offseason Editon

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I too am wondering how Huberdeau would handle playing for the Habs as a local.

Yes, he’s a pro but what’s with the lack of intensity under two coaches now?

Huberdeau is a party boy that was very happy in FLA with his Ferrari and didn’t want the spotlight of a Canadian market.

Him in MTL (being a Franco & al) is a recipe for disaster.
 
We could argue though that some of those decision are being made because the owner actually put pressure on the GM to win
That’s very possible but doesn’t change the fact that they shouldn’t be allowed. But certainly, owners egos can be an issue. Bottom line is desperate moves rarely work out, so if you’re in that position, owner or not, GM should be replaced by the owner rather than make a desperate move(s).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vachon23
It only goes three years beyond Gally and Anderson's contracts. We're going to use that cap space on these two non-factors during the entire time our cap is actually tight anyways, I'd rather gamble on the guy who set the all-time record in assists for LW in a season.

So you have the blue chip prospect, 19 years old Slafkovsky as a 3M player after his ELC.

But you would "gamble" on 32 years old Huberdeau who just had massive decline in his performance because, with the worst contract league wide because of a record he set two seasons ago?

You are looking in the wrong direction my friend. The one we should "gamble" on is the former, not the latter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh
I'd be tempted if CAL held back 4M on Huberdeau's contract and took Gallagher off our hands.

Huberdeau - Suzuki - Caufield
Slafkovsky - Dach - Roy
Newhook - Monahan - Anderson
RHP - Beck - Heineman
ok but then they'd be paying 10.5M for Gallagher? :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh
Not interested in a long retention. Edmonton probably neither.

Gallagher 6.500M until 2027
+ Allen 3.850M until 2025
+ Harris 1.400M until 2025 RFA
vs
Campbell 5.000M until 2027
+ 2024 1st
+ Foegele 2.750M expiring
+ Holloway ELC expiring
This is a pretty good proposal mate. Gally needs to go and we can bury Campbell down the minors. Both are equally bad and its pretty close salary wise adding for Foegele.

First and Holloway for Harris (maybe Kovac?) and Allen is kinda far fetch, I wouldnt be too greedy but its close...

The whole point is solving 3 goalie issues and getting rid of Gallagher contract / roster spot for our soon to be ready prospects.

Time to call Kent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh
So you have the blue chip prospect, 19 years old Slafkovsky as a 3M player after his ELC.

But you would "gamble" on 32 years old Huberdeau who just had massive decline in his performance because, with the worst contract league wide because of a record he set two seasons ago?

You are looking in the wrong direction my friend. The one we should "gamble" on is the former, not the latter.
Which level of hockey except no-NHLer COVID olympics where even many European stars sat out did Slaf show he was an impact player at? Sean Farrell played three less games than him and was only a point behind at the same olympics.

Even pre-seasons, practices, scrimmages, etc, Slaf has never shown any elite skill. Huberdeau was a guy who rose from 2nd round to 3rd overall in a couple of months because we was undeniably talented. I guarantee Slaf would have never sniffed the top 5 if there hadn't been so many league shutdowns during COVID.

Anyway, Slaf's play means he's not even close to getting a raise in the near future. There's no team in the league that would even give him the Kotkaniemi contract right now out of his ELC. He is absolutely going to be bridged at this point.
 
Huberdeau is a party boy that was very happy in FLA with his Ferrari and didn’t want the spotlight of a Canadian market.

Him in MTL (being a Franco & al) is a recipe for disaster.
If Huberdeau did not want to play in Canada then why did he sign an extension just test the free agent market.
 
LOL not one person on this forum has come up with a Calgary or Edmonton proposal that would make sense.

Here's a "brain teaser" problem: Construct a three-way trade proposal for Edmonton, Calgary, and Montreal that helps each team.

Can you do it?
Canadiens trade Allen for Campbell and unprotected first in '24. Montreal three years away from competitive team. Oilers need the 5 million in caproom next three years.

Allen a vet give Oilers depth. Primeau gets his chance in Montreal
 
Last edited:
TBH I would take Huberdeau and a few sweeteners for several cap dumps. Like Huberdeau, Wolf and a first for Gally and Anderson and maybe a goalie. We have 40 mil or something in cap space in two years and every core guy who would command big money basically is locked up already. There's no big money forward coming up in our system, sad to say Slaf will be a 3 mil player. Huberdeau's 115 point season is clearly an outlier in his career, but he's still a good 60-80 point guy who would be our best option to run a PP. Gally and Anderson fit the type of ten-year old system Calgary is trying to play. We literally have zero internal competition to take a spot with Cole and Nick.
That's quite a gamble to me. Maybe Gallagher and Armia for Huberdeau? Doubt they add sweetener. Try to get them take Price contract maybe?
 
This is a pretty good proposal mate. Gally needs to go and we can bury Campbell down the minors. Both are equally bad and its pretty close salary wise adding for Foegele.

First and Holloway for Harris (maybe Kovac?) and Allen is kinda far fetch, I wouldnt be too greedy but its close...

The whole point is solving 3 goalie issues and getting rid of Gallagher contract / roster spot for our soon to be ready prospects.

Time to call Kent.
The first and Holloway for Allen and a young cost-controlled roster D may be in our faovur, but the Gallagher for Campbell straight swap is in Edmonton's favour. Foegele is not worth his contract and won't be extended.

Gallagher will play hockey for them and provide leadership and a kick in the pants to some of the floaters.

Campbell is being buried in the minors by us, he is still better than Strauss Mann and can play as 3rd G if we get an injury to either Monty or Primeau. Longer term, we find another option with the tons of cash we have or Fowler arrives. And we gain Holloway and a 1st
 
  • Like
Reactions: Destopcorner
If Huberdeau did not want to play in Canada then why did he sign an extension just test the free agent market.
He got offered an incredible contract and contract structure, there was nothing in the NHL that would beat risking turning that extension down and waiting to hit UFA.

Gallagher will play hockey for them and provide leadership and a kick in the pants to some of the floaters.
Gallagher is not capable of playing hockey consistently and his leadership is irrelevant/worthless. We should know that by now. Intangibles are intangible.
 
I'd be tempted if CAL held back 4M on Huberdeau's contract and took Gallagher off our hands.

Huberdeau - Suzuki - Caufield
Slafkovsky - Dach - Roy
Newhook - Monahan - Anderson
RHP - Beck - Heineman

I have the feeling it would take Anderson as well.

He got offered an incredible contract and contract structure, there was nothing in the NHL that would beat risking turning that extension down and waiting to hit UFA.


Gallagher is not capable of playing hockey consistently and his leadership is irrelevant/worthless. We should know that by now. Intangibles are intangible.

Well Gally has shown leadership by example of alway giving his all. It's just that his body has fallen. Even recently he has shown more drive than most in the team, especially in his productivity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh
I kinda remember reading that Huberdeau doesn't want to play in Montréal around the time he signed his contract in Calgary. Probably wants to go back in Florida or somewhere in California...
Huber is the type of player who will perform splendidly when surrounded by players who do all the heavy lifting for him. The panthers knew this, sold his stock at the highest possible value, and got Tkachuk.. incredible work by Zito..
 
Well Gally has shown leadership by example of alway giving his all. It's just that his body has fallen. Even recently he has shown more drive than most in the team, especially in his productivity.
Gallagher's mere presence will not change any NHL roster's fate. I don't mean to come across as callous but it's a bit silly to suggest that Edmonton will get over the hump by having Gallagher around, giving it his all.

With Gallagher in the lineup the Habs have had some catastrophic collapses and dud showings, even the game against Tampa the other night. Intangible intangibles.
 
He got offered an incredible contract and contract structure, there was nothing in the NHL that would beat risking turning that extension down and waiting to hit UFA.


Gallagher is not capable of playing hockey consistently and his leadership is irrelevant/worthless. We should know that by now. Intangibles are intangible.
He is playing better than Campbell and Edmonton seems to lack his kind of player in the locker room. They may appreciate the hometown boy.
 
I'd be tempted if CAL held back 4M on Huberdeau's contract and took Gallagher off our hands.

Huberdeau - Suzuki - Caufield
Slafkovsky - Dach - Roy
Newhook - Monahan - Anderson
RHP - Beck - Heineman
Huberdeau seems to be declining at age 29 onward and there are EIGHT YEARS left on his contract. Caufield will be 30 and Huberdeau 38 when the deals finish. Even at $6.5M per year it is highly risky to take that on. Too much risk, not enough reward, and it's not close.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad