Trade Deadline Thread (March 3)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expecting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
lol

1677472962730.png
 
I'm inspired by the Meier trade.

Olofsson
Asplund
Clague
Comrie

for

Labanc
Sturm (Grier will try to make it Bonino)
Benning
Reimer
 
That's way too much, I really like Jeannot too but his 22 goal year is likely an anomaly and he's more likely a 15 goal guy. I'd like to see what Granato could do with him for sure. I'd rather package some of our 2nds.
I guess Tampa in all their infinite wisdom disagrees.
 
I mean, if these are the going rates for players this trade deadline, then I'm fully supportive of GMKA not getting involved.

These trades are BONKERS !

:huh:
Yeah, the East turned into an arms race. Someone has to beat Boston and/or Carolina and GMs are panicking.
 
Meier just went for FIVE solid pieces. Tanner Jeannot just went for a 3rd pairing Dman PLUS a 1st PLUS a 2nd PLUS 3 more picks.

You're complaining that we're not in on these prices?
No idea what Sharks would've wanted from us but both high picks have conditions and the prospects involved aren't anything special. Looks like Meier got traded for a lot of spare parts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daz28 and Beerz
Yes, NJD kept their top prospects. Thing is, we wouldn't have been able to. While we have a very good prospect system........it's entirely top heavy. There's Savoie, Kulich, Ostlund, Rosen, Levi.............then Johnson.........then it falls off of an absolute cliff. We don't have any of these "middle" pieces that NJD just traded. We don't have the defensemen in our system that NJD just traded away. I don't think we were ever in on Meier for that reason.

So we would have had to pony up our 2023 1st, a conditional 2024 1st/2nd.....and then probably two of Savoie/Kulich/Ostlund/Rosen on top just to beat NJD's offer. No way I do that.
Take it back
 
I don't mind moving a big package of picks / prospects like some here who want to hoard them all. But I think I'd rather just do it in the off-season and not have the deadline force you to panic and bid against other desperate teams. Use the 2nds we have for some deadline additions.

I think the narrative that some posters want to only hoard picks is a false one.

Those of us that are against some of these trades are mostly against some of these trades because the players that these proposals are targeting are usually able to go UFA in a year or two, or the cost is a huge overpay, and acquiring them would be a fleecing (not to mention some of them are poorly thought out with cap or are ignoring team needs and fit).

We all dreamed of adding Meier, but the reality is he would more than likely have signed his 10M QO in Buffalo and then bolted via UFA in 2024.

That is poor asset management for a team that is not yet at the level where one piece puts them over the top.

As for the Lawson Crouse idea, if the cost wasn't way out of line with his actual value, that is a move I think would be a wise move to overpay for (within reason). Fills a huge hole and would be around for several years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad