RealGudbranson
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2008
- 848
- 230
Yes we do.If Lindholm starts to click, we dont need another top 6 F
If Lindholm starts to click, we dont need another top 6 F
He’s technically correct on that last point.
They probably didn’t get a 1st so no not correct.
They got a big pile of quantity with no quality.
The prospect TB got back for Duclair is better than anyone Pittsburgh got here.
They probably didn’t get a 1st so no not correct.
They got a big pile of quantity with no quality.
The prospect TB got back for Duclair is better than anyone Pittsburgh got here.
Every team has a skeleton like this in there closet no need to lament over it.He was waived by Carolina and bounced around. He had a coach who believed in him and went out of his way to give him these opportunities to flourish. As opposed to going through our hellscape of a development system playing for Cull or Green or whoever. It wouldn't have happened here for him.
What I do get mad about though is that Clendening is who they targeted. Awful move
Am I missing something.
Reminds me of the Hossa (which included Dupuis) trade where Atlanta got completely bent over.They probably didn’t get a 1st so no not correct.
They got a big pile of quantity with no quality.
The prospect TB got back for Duclair is better than anyone Pittsburgh got here.
Drance is correct, it is the largest package for a rental, just probably not the best.
This generation of Pens’ fans just got their Beech, Sivek and Lupashuk trade.
Yea but Jagr >>> Guentzel.Those guys were at least good prospects at the time of the trade.
Drance is correct, it is the largest package for a rental, just probably not the best.
This generation of Pens’ fans just got their Beech, Sivek and Lupashuk trade.
The more I think about this the more likely it seems, in addition to, or especially as a backup plan if Toffoli is too expensive.Zucker and Dumba with retention for Mikheyev, Raty, and a pick
Going through the tweets, Drance's equivalent for us would be:
Garland, Pettersson, Raty, 1st 2025 and a 5th. Thinks we'd still have to add another prospect.
Drance is overrating Bunting and underrating Garland here.Going through the tweets, Drance's equivalent for us would be:
Garland, Pettersson, Raty, 1st 2025 and a 5th. Thinks we'd still have to add another prospect.
Now we’re talkin!...Theoretically, who would you put on the table for Crosby?
Dubas went for the Jim Benning approach
Older prospect over younger prospect and picks
I mean considering what Guentzel went for......Theoretically, who would you put on the table for Crosby?
Going through the tweets, Drance's equivalent for us would be:
Garland, Pettersson, Raty, 1st 2025 and a 5th. Thinks we'd still have to add another prospect.
Drance is overrating Bunting and underrating Garland here.