- Feb 23, 2014
- 27,944
- 87,621
I'm sorry but anyone saying "extend [player]" brings me the mental image of a medieval device operated by the Spanish Inquisition.
I did see this article...but isn't that data to support Dundon being the issue, not the agent?I'll try to find the link but basically a not insignificant number of agents they interviewed for the piece had Dundon listed as the most difficult front office/owner to work with in the league.
![]()
NHL agent poll: Best and worst owners, Connor McDavid’s contract, future GMs
Who is the toughest team to deal with? Should the NHL have a play-in round? We polled 19 agents, who represent hundreds of players.www.nytimes.com
For me, a lot of this comes down to whether Stankoven can fill that 2C slot. His FO% last year was great in limited numbers, this year not as good.Yep.
By laundering Rantanen the way we did (turning him into an "extended" Rantanen) we probably ended up getting more for Necas than we ever would've trading him directly.
Everyone mad about this needs to get themselves out of "but I wanted to extend Rantanen" mode. Yeah, we all did. It clearly wasn't happening. We've improved our asset position by this overall experiment. It's fine.
I did see this article...but isn't that data to support Dundon being the issue, not the agent?
Crazy thing to me is I thought Rants and Aho were besties? Apparently that didnt matter even though I thought that would make a difference.
Maybe Aho wouldn’t let him use his sauna?
I get where you're coming from but I'll still disagree.Yep.
By laundering Rantanen the way we did (turning him into an "extended" Rantanen) we probably ended up getting more for Necas than we ever would've trading him directly.
Everyone mad about this needs to get themselves out of "but I wanted to extend Rantanen" mode. Yeah, we all did. It clearly wasn't happening. We've improved our asset position by this overall experiment. It's fine.
There are lots of Finns in the NHL.....I'm not putting Aho in the besties category...he wasn't even at this wedding this summer.How? They weren't given permission to talk to Rantanen before the trade, so they traded for him hoping that the team performing well and being besties with Aho would convince him to sign. Obviously, neither happened. Wasn't much homework to be done outside of that.
Only the bestest of friends will miss out your wedding because they knew the she-devil will ruin your mojo.There are lots of Finns in the NHL.....I'm not putting Aho in the besties category...he wasn't even at this wedding this summer.
Not necessarily. Agents want to work with people that give them what they want without having to do a ton of give and take. The Guentzel situation was all Dundon IMO, and it's also why we lost Pesce since we were f***ing around on that one for so longI did see this article...but isn't that data to support Dundon being the issue, not the agent?
well, train left the station already when they gave up Necas and Drury.The whiplash I’m getting reading these comments is wild. 90% of this board thinks this team isn’t a cup contender this year. They trade Rantanen for a 22 year old right handed center and two 1st round picks and everyone doesn’t like it because it doesn’t make them a better team now? Which is it? What do you want them to do?
I get where you're coming from but I'll still disagree.
For a team that's not trying to punt things 3 years down the road it's a bad return for Necas with another year on his deal and Drury.
There's still an hour for them to salvage SOMETHING here but Necas should have been the piece that we add to for a premium long term asset. Stankoven is a good player but we just traded a guy with 100 point upside and a #3 center for a guy that won't approach that for another 3 years if he ever does and a veteran middle 6 winger that's slowing down
I get where you're coming from but I'll still disagree.
For a team that's not trying to punt things 3 years down the road it's a bad return for Necas with another year on his deal and Drury.
There's still an hour for them to salvage SOMETHING here but Necas should have been the piece that we add to for a premium long term asset. Stankoven is a good player but we just traded a guy with 100 point upside and a #3 center for a guy that won't approach that for another 3 years if he ever does and a veteran middle 6 winger that's slowing down
i'm telling youI'd love to hear some dirt come out after this.
I get where you're coming from but I'll still disagree.
For a team that's not trying to punt things 3 years down the road it's a bad return for Necas with another year on his deal and Drury.
There's still an hour for them to salvage SOMETHING here but Necas should have been the piece that we add to for a premium long term asset. Stankoven is a good player but we just traded a guy with 100 point upside and a #3 center for a guy that won't approach that for another 3 years if he ever does and a veteran middle 6 winger that's slowing down