conFABulator
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2021
- 1,934
- 1,714
Team leader in GF/60 just happens to be our friend Kerfoot.
3.1 GF/60 and a nice 1.6 GA/60 too.
Team leader in shooting % τοο.
His stats will look better when he is filling in in the top 6 for sure. However, do they? His CF% ranks 8th on the team, 5th among forwards, and 3rd best on his line so I am not sure this is him driving any results...which again are only 5th best forward. His FF% is 10th on the team, 7th among forwards and again 3rd best on his line.
Yes, he is leading in shooting percentage...In fact, he is leading the history of the NHL in shooting percentage because he is shooting 100%. He has ONE shot on goal this year and it went in. Did you really use shooting percentage for a guy who has ONE shot on goal in support of said player?
He has also won 12 face-offs, why not include that stat if we are sharing cherry-picked data points? No need to mention he has lost 14 FO and has a 46% in the do
Keefe made a point after game 2 of saying he needs more out of Kerfoot and Kerfoot agreed, but hey he got a goal and an assist against Ottawa so all is well.
[EDIT] Checking Fogelhund's stats. I was surprised Kerfoot could possibly be our team leader in GF/60. Am I missing something here, or do you have an error? He has 1 goal so far this year and so do Bunting, Spezza, Engvall and Simmonds. He has more time on ice than Spezza, Engvall and Simmonds...wouldn't that mean they all have a higher GF/60 than he does? Nylander would be ahead of all of them by the way.
At first, it seemed as though you had picked one stat Kerfoot was best in (GF/60) and made that the sole supporting data him being one of our best. I would have thought Corsi or Fenwick might have been better indicators of impact, or at least other indicators of impact...especially with such a small sample size...but you chose GF/60 for some reason? But I think you got it wrong also...again, unless I am missing something.
Last edited: