stickty111
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2017
- 27,241
- 34,181
Pretty much. I guess if you look at both trades, than I guess you prefer Talbot but you are getting what a decent back up in Talbot which is fine but not what we need. With Murray you get upside as a good starter. It doesn't excuse the bad trade Dubas made obviously. You can do better than Talbot in say Reimer. Samsanov is good but my concern with him is you're banking on potential and you are already doing that with Murray. I rather target someone who has already a known performer and Reimer is that. If Reimer trade is too pricy, than Samsanov or Comrie makes sense.Talbot has three advantages over Murray.
1. Shorter contract
2. Cheaper contract
3. He's been more durable.
As @SprDaVE has suggested, he's regressing, and likely won't look very good this year. I don't think this was ever our answer.