I mean, I'm not going to actively complain after a win, but it doesn't mean my mind has been changed. LolBoy one victory over a really bad team and the lynch party seems to have temporarily disbanded.
You made the claim that we are now under an internal salary cap.
The "internal cap" is a proven falsehood.
Teams are less likely to get rid of coaches this year because they are losing money. Montreal made a change because the roster was suppose to be performing better and it looks like Julien had lost the team. Even last year there were really bad stretches. His younger players actually performed worse after being around him vs. better. Also expectations there of winning the cup with the current roster.
They made a change because they could promote an internal guy instead of having to pay 2 head coaching salaries. Actually a great way to test out an internal person with potential before signing to a long-term contract.
They went from an old school coach to a new more player friendly coach.
I keep thinking that to attract fee agent talent to Columbus you need a coach players want to play for. It is not like You can sell lifestyle like FL, NYC, LA, etc.
Big ticket UFAs will not come here because of a coach because that coach will likely be gone before their contract is up. To date, the Jackets have never signed a UFA of any significance and likely won't any time soon because as you say, to the rest of the world we live in Boringville USA. The only thing that will attract a difference-making UFA here is a chance at the Cup, which they've only had one decent run at. The team will likely have to win a Cup through drafting and trades and still have a window to repeat before any big name UFAs would even give us the time of day.
Not true, unless you're arguing that some years don't even have free agents of any significance. Guess who was considered the top free agent of 2013? I don't care for the generalization of Boringville either. Some people like Columbus, some don't.
I didn't say that we live in Boringville; I said that to the rest of the world we live in Boringville.
If Nathan Horton is the big free agent signing over the past 20 years that refutes my argument, then the bar that you set for impact free agent signings is pretty low. As it turned out, he was a booby prize as he was damaged goods who was never healthy enough to have a significant impact here.
Nyquist is not big ticket enough? What is your definition of big ticket?Big ticket UFAs will not come here because of a coach because that coach will likely be gone before their contract is up. To date, the Jackets have never signed a UFA of any significance and likely won't any time soon because as you say, to the rest of the world we live in Boringville USA. The only thing that will attract a difference-making UFA here is a chance at the Cup, which they've only had one decent run at. The team will likely have to win a Cup through drafting and trades and still have a window to repeat before any big name UFAs would even give us the time of day.
I'll give you the news. The big free agent signing is very often a booby prize.
Nyquist is not big ticket enough? What is your definition of big ticket?
No shit, Sherlock. Handing out big bucks over a long term to a guy who may be heading into the downside of his career is a big risk. You're preaching to the choir here. That said, 2013 must have been a good year to not be in the UFA market if a 50ish point player like Horton was the big prize.
The warning signs were there with Horton, who barely got in a half season in the two years prior to his signing here. The team was trying to establish an identity back then and Horton was viewed as the prototype Jacket. It was a nice try on Jarmo's part but it bit him in the ass, especially when he didn't insure the contract.
Again, no shit. Some people like to live in the big city and some people don't. Athletes who make the biggest bucks tend to want to live in the biggest cities and be in the limelight vs. living a very nice, relatively low profile town like Columbus. The UFAs that we have signed have liked it here and often stick around after their careers are over which is a compliment to our town but frankly they haven't been the caliber of player that would put our team over the top.
UFAs sign where they sign for one or more of these reasons: 1) $$$$$, 2) Location (warm and/or glamorous, or 3) a chance at winning a Cup. While Jarmo has shown with Panarin that he's willing to spend big for the right player, Columbus doesn't have enough bright lights, warm weather, or success on the ice to lure a truly difference-making UFA here. It doesn't make Columbus a bad place to live, but it's not the type of place that the best UFAs seek out. Maybe that's a good thing as I'd rather the team be built through the draft and trades vs. UFAs anyways.
I think this team would kill for a 50 point players this year. let's be honest.No shit, Sherlock. Handing out big bucks over a long term to a guy who may be heading into the downside of his career is a big risk. You're preaching to the choir here. That said, 2013 must have been a good year to not be in the UFA market if a 50ish point player like Horton was the big prize.
The warning signs were there with Horton, who barely got in a half season in the two years prior to his signing here. The team was trying to establish an identity back then and Horton was viewed as the prototype Jacket. It was a nice try on Jarmo's part but it bit him in the ass, especially when he didn't insure the contract.
My point about "some folks like Columbus, some don't" wasn't just about residents vs outsiders. Some outsiders like Columbus, some don't.
Again, no shit. Some people like to live in the big city and some people don't. Athletes who make the biggest bucks tend to want to live in the biggest cities and be in the limelight vs. living a very nice, relatively low profile life in a town like Columbus. The UFAs that we have signed have liked it here and often stick around after their careers are over which is a compliment to our town but frankly they haven't been the caliber of player that would put our team over the top.
UFAs sign where they sign for one or more of these reasons: 1) $$$$$, 2) Location (warm and/or glamorous, or 3) a chance at winning a Cup. While Jarmo has shown with Panarin that he's willing to spend big for the right player, Columbus doesn't have enough bright lights, warm weather, or success on the ice to lure a truly difference-making UFA here. It doesn't make Columbus a bad place to live, but it's not the type of place that the best UFAs seek out. Maybe that's a good thing as I'd rather the team be built through the draft and trades vs. UFAs anyways.
Okay, so you mean "big ticket" but only in the better years of the UFA market, and none of the regrettable UFA signings included? Isn't this what Viqsi calls "No True Scotsman"?
Rick Nash, Gus Nyquist, Nathan Horton, etc... etc... evidently aren't going to count as counterexamples here, are they? I think you've terribly exaggerated the issues Columbus has.
I think this team would kill for a 50 point players this year. let's be honest.
This: Your logical fallacy is no true scotsmanFinally, I have no f***ing idea you are talking about re: "No True Scotsman". I don't live on this message board like you seem to do so you'll have to clue me in as to WTF you are talking about.
One has to then wonder just how many "big ticket UFAs" have actually come on the market, like, at all in the last 10 years. (Not many.)Thanks. After reading this, it just confirms to me that the point that mm was trying to make by bringing up your comment is truly bullshit. Whether Nathan Horton was a big ticket UFA signing or not is a subjective argument while putting sugar on porridge is an objective one. One is an undeniable fact while the other is subject to debate. Tavares, Pavelski, and Panarin IMO are UFAs that I would consider significant ones that would have had a difference-making impact here vs. Horton who was a good player when he was healthy but not in the same echelon as the previously mentioned guys. I guess you could say that Horton was a relatively big UFA signing for us along with Adam Foote but if that's the best we can do in the span of 20 years then it can be argued that the Jackets are not an attractive place for impact UFAs. If they win more, maybe that will change but for the time being it's our reality, like it or not.
One has to then wonder just how many "big ticket UFAs" have actually come on the market, like, at all in the last 10 years. (Not many.)
Also, the Pavelski signing was originally not so great for Dallas; he was below half a point per game in the first year. He's having a ludicrously productive career year right now; he literally hasn't scored like this since his NCAA and AHL days. I would therefore question describing him as a "significant" one in the same breath as Tavares and Panarin.