Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 81,997
- 60,082
Yeah I think we need to hold onto Timmins longer to understand what he is.
we're paying klingberg 4 million when timmins was right there the whole time
Am I allowed to ask whether you are still upset about the Curtis Douglas trade?I don't like Lilly running the PP. I think it should be Timmins running it
Am I allowed to ask whether you are still upset about the Curtis Douglas trade?
With the emergence of Cowan, holmberg, Minten, knies. Steeves seems like such an after thought now
lol i've been saying this since we signed klingberg, it's not based on his play in the first game. it's just my hill to die on this season.Timmins is productive but still raw. Whereas Klingberg has the high end skills package but people are pre-emptively whipping him for no reason.
I agree, just remember a few years ago he, and abruzesse were seen as our future bottom six depth optionsDon’t think Steeves was ever meant to be more than a darkhorse candidate.
Cowan is cheeky like a young Marner.
yea hes gone than lolFor us to sign Gregor he needs to go through waivers 1st
Maybe there is room for both Timmins and Klingberg. If they really wanted more offense from our D, then we would have Rielly, Klingberg, and Timmins on different pairings. They can all make plays and get the puck to the net or into the hands of our forwards in dangerous areas.