aufheben
#Norris4Fox
My concern isn't whether not a less aggressive d-zone system would improve the defense. I'm wondering what would happen to the offense. There's no reason playing less aggressive defense would not help the Rangers' slot coverage. Overloading the strong side leaves only 2 players left to defend the slot. If there is any sort of miscue by either of those players, then the remaining player now has to defend against 1-3 Leafs with a large amount of open ice.
The first thing here is neither of those 2 Rangers in the slot are defensemen. McDonagh and Holden each have a man in the corner trying to win a puck battle, Vesey's position blocks a pass back to Gardiner's point, Hayes has the passing lane to Matthews mostly blocked, and Grabner is in the slot near Matthews, but he has to also account for the Leaf's RD out of the frame. Still, the coverage doesn't look too bad.
All it takes is Hayes to skate few strides away from Matthews to support McDonagh and Holden, now all of the sudden Matthews is completely unimpeded, and the Leafs RD is starting to pinch into all the open space. Regardless of what Hayes did or didn't do wrong, only having 2 players defending the most dangerous part of the ice allows for almost no error.
The first thing here is neither of those 2 Rangers in the slot are defensemen. McDonagh and Holden each have a man in the corner trying to win a puck battle, Vesey's position blocks a pass back to Gardiner's point, Hayes has the passing lane to Matthews mostly blocked, and Grabner is in the slot near Matthews, but he has to also account for the Leaf's RD out of the frame. Still, the coverage doesn't look too bad.

All it takes is Hayes to skate few strides away from Matthews to support McDonagh and Holden, now all of the sudden Matthews is completely unimpeded, and the Leafs RD is starting to pinch into all the open space. Regardless of what Hayes did or didn't do wrong, only having 2 players defending the most dangerous part of the ice allows for almost no error.
